Bug#568317: Processed: cloning 568317, reassign -1 to kernel-package

2010-02-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:24 +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: [...] > Please note: I never refused, never declined. Please retract. > > Maybe I "failed to deliver", but only because I was wilfully misled into > thinking that such was not wanted. Will never again listen to Maks. :-) Fair enou

Bug#568317: Processed: cloning 568317, reassign -1 to kernel-package

2010-02-16 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben, >>> I know the scripts suck but I am not in a position to rewrite them. ... >>> I fixed this in the svn branch ... >> >> You seem to be contradicting yourself. > > Not at all. ... I have made a localised fix ... I have removed ... > I would like to go much further ... OK, you seem to ma

Bug#568317: Processed: cloning 568317, reassign -1 to kernel-package

2010-02-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 09:12 +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > Dear Ben, > > > ... Sorry for the mistake. > > OK, you are only human and forgiven. > > > I know the scripts suck but I am not in a position to rewrite them. ... > > I fixed this in the svn branch ... > > You seem to be contra

Bug#568317: Processed: cloning 568317, reassign -1 to kernel-package

2010-02-16 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben, > ... Sorry for the mistake. OK, you are only human and forgiven. > I know the scripts suck but I am not in a position to rewrite them. ... > I fixed this in the svn branch ... You seem to be contradicting yourself. > I asked you to send patches for linux-2.6, and you refused. Huh?

Bug#568317: Processed: cloning 568317, reassign -1 to kernel-package

2010-02-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:27 +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > Dear Ben, > > You wrote: > > > The OP asked us to report the bug, so I assumed he didn't. > > Seems you did not pay attention to > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568317#86 > written a week before your cloning: