On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:24 +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: [...] > Please note: I never refused, never declined. Please retract. > > Maybe I "failed to deliver", but only because I was wilfully misled into > thinking that such was not wanted. Will never again listen to Maks. :-)
Fair enough, I retract that. > >>> I fixed this in the svn branch for lenny and it should be in the next > >>> stable update. > >> > >> Thanks. Pity you did not let Bug#568317 (and thus the world) know. > > > > Normal practice is simply to tag a bug pending when the fix is > > committed, and that has been done (automatically). > > Wow, I was not aware of that. But then... Bug#568823 had been "pending" > (I think is now "done"): does that mean that I can expect to see > kernel-package_12.033 in lenny, in the near future? (Surely not, surely > "commit" has meanings unrelated to "to be in next stable update".) This is true; 'pending' only tells you that the maintainer is preparing to fix the bug in some new package version, but not which distributions will be fixed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Make three consecutive correct guesses and you will be considered an expert.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
