Bug#548630: #548630

2009-10-18 Thread Hans IJ
Hi Ben, I run some more tests with linux-image-2.6.30-2-686. My system has 2x2GB memory in *dual* channel configuration. - When I removed one of the 2GB memory sticks, all went fine. I have tested both sticks. Both are ok. - When I put 2x2GB in *single* channel configuration, all went fine - I tes

Bug#548630: #548630

2009-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 22:04 +0200, Hans IJ wrote: > Hi Ben > > I tested with linux-image-2.6.30-2-686. It did not solve the problem. > > I did do another test. I was using luks/dm-crypt on both drives. I > also tested now on a drive w/o encryption. It still crashed, but > *only* after 100GB, w

Bug#548630: #548630

2009-10-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:03 +0200, Hans IJ wrote: > Additional testing information: > - Setting BIOS IDE mode to "IDE" does not solve the problem. It does > reproduce a bit more random, but it does happen if the transferred > data is large enough. > - Re-tested with Ubuntu 9.04, with latest updates

Bug#548630: #548630

2009-09-29 Thread Hans IJ
Additional testing information: - Setting BIOS IDE mode to "IDE" does not solve the problem. It does reproduce a bit more random, but it does happen if the transferred data is large enough. - Re-tested with Ubuntu 9.04, with latest updates: Same Problem happens. - To rule out memory issues: memtest