Hi,
I just tested the status of the support for this card using the Debian
kernel packages. Here are the updated results:
-> Squeeze's kernel (2.6.32-5-686 / 2.6.32-21):
It still does not work, either with network-manager or without it.
-> Kernel at experimental (2.6.35-trunk-686 / 2.6.35-1~expe
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 14:04 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 15:07 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > This patch seems to have fixed it. Here are the results of my testing:
> [...]
>> Right. So I'll need t
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 14:04 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 15:07 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
> > Hi
> > This patch seems to have fixed it. Here are the results of my testing:
[...]
> Right. So I'll need to do something a bit smarter to cover all devices.
Can you tes
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 15:07 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
> Hi
> This patch seems to have fixed it. Here are the results of my testing:
>
>
> kernel.org's 2.6.34:
> => with the usbnet-Set-parent-device-early-for-netdev_printk patch:
> Seems to work without any problems
OK, that should be
Hi
This patch seems to have fixed it. Here are the results of my testing:
kernel.org's 2.6.34:
=> with the usbnet-Set-parent-device-early-for-netdev_printk patch:
Seems to work without any problems
Debian's 2.6.34 from experimental:
=> with both patches:
usbnet-Set-parent-device-early-for-net
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 02:51 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Please can you confirm or correct the following summary of your results
> > so far:
> >
> > Debian 2.6.32-15: fails to pass traffic
>
> Correct.
>
> > Debian 2.6.32-15 wi
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Please can you confirm or correct the following summary of your results
> so far:
>
> Debian 2.6.32-15: fails to pass traffic
Correct.
> Debian 2.6.32-15 with patch reverted: good
I had no crashes since Monday (June 21st). So, apparently ye
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 02:09 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in
> > release candidates for 2.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
>
> Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in
> release candidates for 2.6.35 and will need to be reverted there as well
> if it caused this regressi
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
> Possibily you are right. :)
> It seems to be working for 2.6.32. I'll compile 2.6.34 today or
> tomorrow without the patch and see if it also works.
Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in
release cand
It doesn't seem to work on 2.6.34. See attachment.
I had no problems on 2.6.32-5 yet.
Regards,
Pitxyoki
rndis_wlan - 2.6.34-1 (without rndis_host patch)
Description: Binary data
Possibily you are right. :)
It seems to be working for 2.6.32. I'll compile 2.6.34 today or
tomorrow without the patch and see if it also works.
Thanks,
Pitxyoki
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
(...)
>
> Or possibly this bug fix is bad for that device:
>
> debian/patches/
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 00:55 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
> As I told you I would, I tested WUSB54GS support on the kernels
> shipped by Debian: 2.6.32 (2.6.32-15) from Squeeze and 2.6.34
> (2.6.34-1~experimental.2) from sid. Unfortunately, none of them
> worked. :(
>
> I'm attaching the o
As I told you I would, I tested WUSB54GS support on the kernels
shipped by Debian: 2.6.32 (2.6.32-15) from Squeeze and 2.6.34
(2.6.34-1~experimental.2) from sid. Unfortunately, none of them
worked. :(
I'm attaching the output at syslog with network-manager and with an
/etc/network/interfaces file
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:21:36PM +, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
>
> The relevant patches were the ones resulting from bug #12794 at the
> kernel.org buzilla [1]. This resulted in three commits to the mainline
> kernel: [2,3,4].
>
> Regards,
> Pitxyoki
>
> [1] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:43 AM, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> please be specific which commits (sha1sums) are needed, the more info you give
> us the quicker we can backport those or feed upstream stable.
>
> thanks for giving feedback.
>
The relevant patches were the ones resulting from
hello
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:28:55AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 17:00 + schrieb Luís Picciochi Oliveira:
> >
> > However, I have been using linux kernel 2.6.33-rc1 because this card
> > is now supported and works well on it. So, I don't need ndiswrappe
reassign 520468 linux-2.6
severity 520468 normal
retitle 520468 Incorporate fixes for WUSB54GS support from 2.6.33
thanks
Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 17:00 + schrieb Luís Picciochi Oliveira:
> Hello,
> I just tested ndiswrapper 1.55. It is still giving the same output as
> before.
>
> Howeve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 520468 linux-2.6
Bug #520468 [ndiswrapper-source] ndiswrapper-source: ndiswrapper does not show
device with kernel > 2.6.26
Bug reassigned from package 'ndiswrapper-source' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions ndiswr
19 matches
Mail list logo
