On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:31 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote: > Possibily you are right. :) > It seems to be working for 2.6.32. I'll compile 2.6.34 today or > tomorrow without the patch and see if it also works.
Please do test that as soon as possible. This change is included in release candidates for 2.6.35 and will need to be reverted there as well if it caused this regression. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
