All,
On 10/10/06, Dmitry Semyonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/9/06, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 21:16 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > > I didn't know Compaq used two different 53[cC]510 parts.
> > > Patch below adds the same tweak to the 0x0010 device
Hi Dann,
On 10/9/06, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 21:16 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > I didn't know Compaq used two different 53[cC]510 parts.
> > Patch below adds the same tweak to the 0x0010 device ID.
[...]
Are you able to test this fix?
Of course!
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 10:24:59PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 21:16 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > I didn't know Compaq used two different 53[cC]510 parts.
> > Patch below adds the same tweak to the 0x0010 device ID.
> >
> > James or willy, this look good to you?
>
>
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 04:16:58PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> No I mean the message from Yanko Kaneti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which says,
...
Yanko-san didn't have his facts quite right though I agree his
conclusion is correct:
linux-2.6.18/include/linux/pci_ids.h says:
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_LSI_53
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 21:16 -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> I didn't know Compaq used two different 53[cC]510 parts.
> Patch below adds the same tweak to the 0x0010 device ID.
>
> James or willy, this look good to you?
It seems reasonable.
Can we get confirmation from the bug submitter that it ac
James Bottomley writes...
> Er ... you mean the email that I sent pointing to a fix in the
> scsi-rc-fixes tree? Then yes, I think it's a correct fix. It's already
> in 2.6.18
No I mean the message from Yanko Kaneti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which says,
"Correct me if I am wrong but the fix mentio
dann frazier writes...
> hey Grant/James,
> It looks like we're still having cpqarray/sym2 conflicts under
> 2.6.18 - any idea what this problem may be?
This is for dl380. At the very bottom (after the close of the bug) of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380272
someone sug
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 14:40 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> dann frazier writes...
>
> > hey Grant/James,
> > It looks like we're still having cpqarray/sym2 conflicts under
> > 2.6.18 - any idea what this problem may be?
>
> This is for dl380. At the very bottom (after the close of the bug) of
>
hey Grant/James,
It looks like we're still having cpqarray/sym2 conflicts under
2.6.18 - any idea what this problem may be?
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:07:34PM +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
> Version: 2.6.18-2
> Severity: important
>
> This is very similar to
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: important
This is very similar to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380272
The same workaround could be used to overcome the problem:
cat cpqarray >> /etc/initramfs-tools/modules
update-initramfs -u
lspci -v output fr
10 matches
Mail list logo
