also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1658 +0100]:
> anyway the initramfs-tools implementation targets 1.9.0-4sarge1,
> so i'm happy on your input for the sarge specific version.
difficult to say. creating mdadm.conf (see /usr/share/mdadm/mkconf)
and running `mdadm -Asayes
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 03:13:32PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1439 +0100]:
> > mdrun was avoided due too getting random md devices.
> > although according to fjp older mdadm seems to have it's share
> > of problems:
> > http://lists
also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1439 +0100]:
> mdrun was avoided due too getting random md devices.
> although according to fjp older mdadm seems to have it's share
> of problems:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/07/msg00244.html
These problems should be sol
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 07:25:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 05:53:27PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Anyway, I disagree with the way 0.73 fixes the bug: it replicates
> > the functionality provided by mdadm >=2.5-1 into a hack within the
> > package. Granted, the h
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 05:53:27PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Anyway, I disagree with the way 0.73 fixes the bug: it replicates
> the functionality provided by mdadm >=2.5-1 into a hack within the
> package. Granted, the hack is only used when mdadm >=2.5-1 is not
> installed, but still, it's
I won't comment on the silliness of the severity tennis played by
the maintainer. The bug is critical even according to the release
team.
Anyway, I disagree with the way 0.73 fixes the bug: it replicates
the functionality provided by mdadm >=2.5-1 into a hack within the
package. Granted, the hack
6 matches
Mail list logo
