On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:19 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:08:18AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:55:27AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrot
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:08:18AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:55:27AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > > > > It is much more user-friendly, and it readly provi
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> No, the packages would still be kernel-*-2.6.11, but the version number would
> be 2.6.11.6-, yiedling stuff like :
>
> kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.6-1_all.deb
>
> Which is ok, and doesn't trigger NEW. I vote for that.
Which is what I thought would ha
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:08:18AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:55:27AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > > > It is much more user-friendly, and it readly provides information on the
> > > > most up-to-date tree it was synced wit
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:55:57PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > > > with 2.6.11.X, including the numbering (i.e. next upload should be
> > > > kernel-source-2.6.11, package version 2.6.11.6-1).
> > >
> > > I agree it wou
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:55:27AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > > It is much more user-friendly, and it readly provides information on the
> > > most up-to-date tree it was synced with, in aptitude/dselect/synaptic...
> >
> > Yes, but the proble
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > It is much more user-friendly, and it readly provides information on the
> > most up-to-date tree it was synced with, in aptitude/dselect/synaptic...
>
> Yes, but the problem is that each time it changes backages
> have to go through a NEW cycle.
I assume you
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:27:19AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > > with 2.6.11.X, including the numbering (i.e. next upload should be
> > > kernel-source-2.6.11, package version 2.6.11.6-1).
> >
> > I agree it would be good to sync up the patches
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > > with 2.6.11.X, including the numbering (i.e. next upload should be
> > > kernel-source-2.6.11, package version 2.6.11.6-1).
> >
> > I agree it would be good to sync up the patches,
> > but I don't think there is any need
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > with 2.6.11.X, including the numbering (i.e. next upload should be
> > kernel-source-2.6.11, package version 2.6.11.6-1).
>
> I agree it would be good to sync up the patches,
> but I don't think there is any need to include the
> .6 in the debian version as we
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:17:18AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > With the exception of the load_elf_library problem,
> > which I will check on now, I believe I have patches for
> > the rest in SVN as neccessary for:
>
> I have checked 2.6.11 (loo
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> With the exception of the load_elf_library problem,
> which I will check on now, I believe I have patches for
> the rest in SVN as neccessary for:
I have checked 2.6.11 (looked it over, I am not running 2.6.11 here yet),
and it looks OK. It would be a very good
tag 301799 +pending
thanks
Hi,
I have now applied the fix for the load_elf_library DOS to
2.6.11, 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 in SVN and will run some builds.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 301799 +pending
Bug#301799: kernel-tree-2.6.11: new upstream source available: 2.6.11.6
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:10:20AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Package: kernel-tree-2.6.11
> Version: 2.6.11-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> As usual. I feel weird filling what used to be a wishlist-level report as
> grave, but...
>
>
Package: kernel-tree-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
As usual. I feel weird filling what used to be a wishlist-level report as
grave, but...
Summary of changes from v2.6.11.5 to v2.6.11.6
==
Ch
16 matches
Mail list logo
