On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:55:27AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote: > > > It is much more user-friendly, and it readly provides information on the > > > most up-to-date tree it was synced with, in aptitude/dselect/synaptic... > > > > Yes, but the problem is that each time it changes backages > > have to go through a NEW cycle. > > I assume you mean for the binary packages? I was only paying attention to > the kernel-source, kernel-patch and kernel-tree packages...
To follow the current naming convention, I believe that they all would have to go through new, and also would not be an upgrade path, but a fresh install for users. > > -- > "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring > them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond > where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot > Henrique Holschuh -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
