On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:47:17PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> afaik the strong point is that initramfs uses klibc and non glibc,
> it should be smaller compared to current initrd image, plus it
> doesn't need shell script magic as it's an cpio archive.
Yep, my own experiments show a factor
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the closing message for this bug, you note:
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:33:16AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > anyway postsarge it will be replaced by an initramfs implementation,
> > so you won't have to rant on
Hi,
In the closing message for this bug, you note:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:33:16AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> anyway postsarge it will be replaced by an initramfs implementation,
> so you won't have to rant on initrd-tools anymore.
I didn't see that mentioned before on debian
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 17:22:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291375: initrd-tools for Debian are one big mess
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
4 matches
Mail list logo
