Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 17:22:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291375: initrd-tools for Debian are one big mess
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2005 11:34:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 03:34:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oohaa.net (carredas.oohaa.net) [212.91.164.90]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CraaJ-0007HP-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 03:34:44 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by carredas.oohaa.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB5AAFB3B;
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:54:02 +0200 (EET)
Received: from carredas.oohaa.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (carredas [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 03689-04; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:54:02 +0200 (EET)
Received: by carredas.oohaa.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 791E0AFB42; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:54:02 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bozhan Boiadzhiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: initrd-tools for Debian are one big mess
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:54:02 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at carredas.oohaa.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.76
Severity: wishlist
If someone ever tried initrd tools for debian and red hat
you'l find a "little" difference .
With red hat tools you can do whatever you want and to customize
initrd image the way you want very easy.
IN other way the dabian mkinitrd is very bad documented, can't do
most of the things for more complex operation or isn't documented how to
do this operations.
So my suggestion is ... get red hat initrd-tools and make them work in
debian and drop current initrd-tools OR make this thing works as it works
in Red Hat .
This my opinion is based on my battle for crating initrd image for
booting strange raid controler ITE8212f and complains from my friend
that he can't make initrd image to boot from USB Ffash memory with
debian but there isn't ANY problems with redhat.
And wow there are so many bug about initrd-tools.
I think debian kernel development team have to take this things very
seriosly.
Sorry for bad english and this is only my opinion.
It is possible that i am wrong:)
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages initrd-tools depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities
ii cpio 2.5-1.1 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii cramfsprogs 1.1-6 Tools for CramFs (Compressed ROM F
ii dash 0.5.1-3 The Debian Almquist Shell
ii fileutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU file management utilities
ii util-linux 2.12-10 Miscellaneous system utilities
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291375-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 15:23:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 08:23:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DY3uS-0004EP-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 08:23:05 -0700
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A095C010
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 May 2005 17:22:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DY3tw-0001GV-Ob
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 May 2005 17:22:32 +0200
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 17:22:32 +0200
From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#291375: initrd-tools for Debian are one big mess
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Bozhan Boiadzhiev wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.76
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> If someone ever tried initrd tools for debian and red hat
> you'l find a "little" difference .
> With red hat tools you can do whatever you want and to customize
> initrd image the way you want very easy.
> IN other way the dabian mkinitrd is very bad documented, can't do
> most of the things for more complex operation or isn't documented how to
> do this operations.
> So my suggestion is ... get red hat initrd-tools and make them work in
> debian and drop current initrd-tools OR make this thing works as it works
> in Red Hat .
well this shell script seems easier to read indeed,
but has lots of rh specific stuff hardcoded like kudzu.
so it's not appropriate at this stage.
> This my opinion is based on my battle for crating initrd image for
> booting strange raid controler ITE8212f and complains from my friend
> that he can't make initrd image to boot from USB Ffash memory with
> debian but there isn't ANY problems with redhat.
please file separte bugs for them,
i can't help from the tiny bits reported.
> And wow there are so many bug about initrd-tools.
> I think debian kernel development team have to take this things very
> seriosly.
we are sorting things out for the sarge release,
and fixing the release critical bugs inside of it.
latest sarge has already seen nice fixes for them.
anyway postsarge it will be replaced by an initramfs implementation,
so you won't have to rant on initrd-tools anymore.
> Sorry for bad english and this is only my opinion.
> It is possible that i am wrong:)
no problem.
>
> Thanks
>
have a nice day,
closing your bug report to get the rant out of sight,
when overlooking bug reports :-)
thanks
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
