Re: About package linux-image-rt-amd64

2016-09-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 21:43 +0200, José Agustín Terol Sanchis wrote: > That totally makes sense! > > I supose that removing the meta-package is better than leave it there, > since it could remain outdated or cause any kind of conflicts, right? This is how it works: - The 'linux-latest' source pa

Re: About package linux-image-rt-amd64

2016-09-06 Thread José Agustín Terol Sanchis
That totally makes sense! I supose that removing the meta-package is better than leave it there, since it could remain outdated or cause any kind of conflicts, right? Thank you again, Agus Terol 2016-09-06 21:31 GMT+02:00 Uwe Kleine-König : > Hello, > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:00:36PM +020

Re: About package linux-image-rt-amd64

2016-09-06 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello, On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:00:36PM +0200, José Agustín Terol Sanchis wrote: > A few days ago, I saw that meta-package linux-image-rt-amd64 was available > on sid. However, it is no more there. Also, I would say this is not the > first time I have seen realtime kernal related packages appear

About package linux-image-rt-amd64

2016-09-06 Thread José Agustín Terol Sanchis
Hi, A few days ago, I saw that meta-package linux-image-rt-amd64 was available on sid. However, it is no more there. Also, I would say this is not the first time I have seen realtime kernal related packages appear and disapper on Debian sid (even in testing). So, I am a bit confused about kernel