On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 21:43 +0200, José Agustín Terol Sanchis wrote: > That totally makes sense! > > I supose that removing the meta-package is better than leave it there, > since it could remain outdated or cause any kind of conflicts, right?
This is how it works:
- The 'linux-latest' source package is built for a specific Linux ABI
version (currently, 4.7.0-1)
- It builds a meta-package for each of the kernel configurations
enabled for that version, which no longer includes the 'rt-amd64'
configuration
- The FTP team periodically removes binary packages that are not built
by the latest version of a source package ('decrufting')
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
