On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 12:55 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
> > However, the same applies to several other package names that change
> > with the upstream version number: linux-source-,
> > linux-doc-, linux-manual- and
> > linux-patch-debian-. I think perhaps we should
Ben Hutchings writes:
> However, the same applies to several other package names that change
> with the upstream version number: linux-source-,
> linux-doc-, linux-manual- and
> linux-patch-debian-. I think perhaps we should remove those
> with wildcards as well.
Sure, should I send a new patch
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 09:54 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems that if I debuild the linux-2.6 package multiple times in a
> row and increment the version number it does not remove the old
> debian/linux-support-* directories.
>
> Is there some reason why it is not removed on c
Hi,
it seems that if I debuild the linux-2.6 package multiple times in a
row and increment the version number it does not remove the old
debian/linux-support-* directories.
Is there some reason why it is not removed on clean? If not, would the
attached patch be ok?
Index: linux-2.6/debian/rules
4 matches
Mail list logo
