Re: [Debian] Re: lenny updates

2009-03-20 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > Yet one more important fix while we're at it. > > This fixes udev in a container, OpenVZ bug #1195. Not a security fix but > quite important functionality issue since many distros rely on udev by > default nowdays. Thanks Kir. I've

Re: [Debian] Re: lenny updates

2009-03-16 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi Kir Do it need to be in the changelog? In the file debian/patches/series/14-extra all the files are listed explicitly. Would that be enough? Best regards, // Ola On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:30:57PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > I hope that changelog will include something to uniquely identif

Re: [Debian] Re: lenny updates

2009-03-16 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
I hope that changelog will include something to uniquely identify the patches that were included. The best thing would be to have git commit IDs, but anything else that can be used to find out git commit id is fine, too. Note that commit ID can be shortened to say first 8 chars without a high

Re: [Debian] Re: lenny updates

2009-03-16 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Ok added as well. I'll make a new proposed patch soon. Best regards, // Ola On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > Yet one more important fix while we're at it. > > This fixes udev in a container, OpenVZ bug #1195. Not a security fix but > quite important functionalit

Re: [Debian] Re: lenny updates

2009-03-16 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
Yet one more important fix while we're at it. This fixes udev in a container, OpenVZ bug #1195. Not a security fix but quite important functionality issue since many distros rely on udev by default nowdays. >From 5dcfcf5defb9a1037de717f56a54f8cbb461e96d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Konstantin