On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > Yet one more important fix while we're at it. > > This fixes udev in a container, OpenVZ bug #1195. Not a security fix but > quite important functionality issue since many distros rely on udev by > default nowdays.
Thanks Kir. I've filed a report to track this issue. (In general, we try to have a bug report for each issue we fix in a stable update). Can you elaborate on the impact of this bug? Does it break all virtual servers that require udev, Gentoo being an example? I take it that Debian virtual servers aren't affected (or we'd hear a lot more screaming) - is that because they are typically configuerd to run without udev? -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
