should not be a hard dependency on iw, this might need a separate check
or a warning...
Best regards,
Georg
But for other configurations it is worse:
config NO_HZ_FULL
bool "Full dynticks system (tickless)"
...
This is implemented at the expense of some overhead in user <-> kernel
transitions: syscalls, exceptions and interrupts. Even when it's
dynamically off.
far as I can tell.
It's always six lines of "gdk_monitor_get_scale_factor: assertion
'GDK_IS_MONITOR (monitor)' failed" followed by one single line with
"[drm] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun"
Best regards
Georg
Package: linux-image-4.19.0-5-rt-arm64
Version: 4.19.37-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Install linux-image-4.19.0-5-rt-arm64
I installed the unofficial image from debian arm64
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.18.6-1
Severity: wishlist
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 4.18.0-1-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version
7.3.0 (Debian 7.3.0-29)) #1 SMP Debian 4.18.6-1 (2018-09-06)
** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.18.0-1-amd64
root=U
n while the CONFIG_STUB_POULSBO is not set, backlight brightness can
be set by with e.g. the brightness keys on the keyboard when using this
kernel, so at the moment I'm not really seeing what CONFIG_STUB_POULSBO
is good for...
Georg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@list
Quoting myself:
Georg Sassen wrote:
> It seems CONFIG_DRM_GMA500 (and maybe CONFIG_STUB_POULSBO) is not set
> in the kernel config, so the gma500_gfx is not built at all, maybe
> because of the name change from psb_gfx which was loaded with the
> 3.2.35 kernel.
>
> I enabled
ne is compiling a new
kernel, which might take some time though...
I will tell if it works.
Georg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130321133358.ga30...@sassen.de
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.39-2
Severity: important
While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version
3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution in X11 and the
initial framebuffer now on my Nokia Booklet 3G since the update.
-- Package-specific info
it happened, 'cause the pc was not useable anymore.
> reportbug --template linux-image-$(uname -r)
> reportbug --template xserver-xorg-video-i915
Attached.
Include network configuration and status from this computer? Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Jonathan,
> Please file a separate bug.
Sorry. I've filed #669313.
Greetings,
Georg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http:
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 3.2+44~bpo60+1
Severity: important
[ 577.996012] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed...
GPU hung
[ 577.996019] [drm] capturing error event; look for more information in
/debug/dri/0/i915_error_state
[ 580.484021] [drm:i915_hangche
Hi all,
I've installed yesterday a Dell Dimension 2400 with Debian Squeeze.
Experienced the same problem, upgraded to
- linux-image-686-pae 3.2+44~bpo60+1
- libdrm-intel1 2.4.26-1~bpo60+1.
However, the problem still occurs.
Any advice someone?
Thanks,
Georg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
or me, at least until we understand a
> little more about the sandbox, is to simply avoid using Google
> Chrome.
I totally have to agree with both statements above!
/Georg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&
On 18 Mar 2010, b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +0100, Georg Borgström wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to disable the "sandbox" mentioned in
>> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440 by adding the
>> s
arting chrome and no ugly "crash" when leaving chrome!
Probably no kernel bug after all.
Can you Berni try the switch and see if it helps?
/Georg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
m
ns"
At 16:16:39 I closed chrome and got the rest.
Please let me know if I can supply any other useful information.
/Georg
Mar 17 16:16:33 big kernel: [ 245.473073] Not cloning cgroup for unused
subsystem ns
Mar 17 16:16:39 big kernel: [ 254.029728] [ cut here ]
Same problem here. Wonder why chrome manage to do this. Rock solid
otherwise!
Debian Lenny/stable fully uppdated.
Linux big 2.6.26-2-686-bigmem #1 SMP Wed Nov 4 21:12:12 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
Virtualbox 3.0.12-54655_Debian_lenny from Sun repos and
nvidia-kernel-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem 173.14.09+3+
The bug was introduced on the transition from linux-image-2.6.18-3-686
to linux-image-2.6.18-4-686. I tried linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 where also
no duplication of packets occurs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
In the changelog of kernel v2.6.18-rc4 there is a bug fix described,
where recvfrom delivered only copies of previously received data instead
of the newly arrived data for a UDP socket (search for recvfrom in the
changelog). I experienced
it is in the kernel --
the firewall rules are correct and the packages are not recognized as a
part of the existing connection.
Thanks,
Georg
Here the system information about the client:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing&
ng different .config files alltogether?
If you could point me to the correct source files of the driver (maybe in
drivers/ide/), I wouldn't mind trying a less brute-force approach.
Thanks!
Georg
--
Georg Wittenburg
http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~wittenbu/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Oleg
Sorry for taking so long to reply.
On Thursday 05 October 2006 06:55, you wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:30:13PM +0200, Georg Wittenburg wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 16:24, you wrote:
> > > On 2006-10-02, Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hi Oleg!
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 16:24, you wrote:
> On 2006-10-02, Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Doesn't seem like it was fixed in 2.6.18 (from
> > linux-image-2.6.18-1-686),=20 unfortunately.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ egrep "
Hi Oleg!
On Sunday 01 October 2006 23:36, you wrote:
> On 2006-10-01, Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
> > Version: 2.6.17-9
> > Severity: normal
>
> [-0-]
>
> > Kernel 2.6.17 (from linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
7;d be happy to provide more information, if required.
Thanks for looking into this!
Regards,
Georg
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: i3
Hi David!
On Monday 02 January 2006 21:24, David Schmitt wrote:
> Dear Georg!
>
> Could you please retest with a current kernel (testing:2.6.12,
> unstable:2.6.14) and a current udev (>= 0.076).
>
> Using initramfs-tools for creating the initrd is probably a good idea too.
U
Nevermind, I just noticed that I had /proc/sys/vm/swappiness set to 0 which
apparently was OK in 2.6.10, but triggers the OOM killer in 2.6.11. Leaving
the swappiness value at the default 60 gives you a perfectly usable system.
Please close this bug.
Sorry for the trouble,
Georg
--
Georg
:657736 kB
Committed_AS: 432420 kB
PageTables: 3196 kB
VmallocTotal: 770040 kB
VmallocUsed: 8592 kB
VmallocChunk: 761368 kB
This problem was definately introduced in 2.6.11. Never happen with 2.6.10.
Thanks for looking into this. Regards,
Georg
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: important
Hi,
I'm seeing the "Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to BAP" bug as
described in FAQ at http://ozlabs.org/people/dgibson/dldwd/ about once
every other day. orinoco.c prints to the syslog at such a rate, that the
system becomes c
Hello!
Just a quick note that this bug is still present in 2.6.10, and hence this
report should be moved over to that package.
Thanks again.
Georg
--
Georg Wittenburg
http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~wittenbu/
pgpjsRSX6UUwZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
as my BIOS doesn't support these values.
This problem is similar to bug #289810, but I doubt that is directly
related as vesafb doesn't figure into this particular configuration.
Thanks for looking into this.
Georg
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT p
"disk sleep."
Thanks for looking into this. Regards,
Georg
--
Georg Wittenburg
http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~wittenbu/
pgp03DItwRSvY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
This is my correct e-mail address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist.
--
Joosep-Georg Järvemaa
Package: kernel
Version: 20040801
Severity: normal
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.18-1-686-smp (2.4.18-13.1) ...
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: /dev/vg0/lv1: Unknown root device
Please refer to the manual page.
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.4.18-1-686-s
35 matches
Mail list logo
