Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> > ok, do you have a chance to test something newer preferred git-current ?
> >>
> >> If you have a kernel I can try, sure. Building one is another story,
> >> this machine
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bogendoerfer) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > ok, do you have a chance to test something newer preferred git-current ?
>
> If you have a kernel I can try, sure. Building one is another story,
> this machine isn't exactly fast nor quiet, as you probably know.
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: normal
>
>
> In case you're not aware, the linux-libre project grew out of
> gNewSense's efforts to publish 100% Free Software extracts from the
> kernel distributed by kernel.org, later on picked up by BLAG and, more
> recently, by FSF Lati
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-03 15:18]:
> > > > The appended patch works around the problem. I don't tag it as patch
> > > > because its implications are not fully analyzed upstream. It works
> > > > well o
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:54:15AM +0100, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Denís Fernández Cabrera wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I dist-upgraded, last weekend, to the lastest version of Sid on the
> > > repositories for my iBook G4 (summer 2005). Ge
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I'd like to enable some debug options for all images:
> - PRINTK_TIME
Is this one useful for non-esoteric cases?
> - DEBUG_KERNEL
> - SCHED_DEBUG, not sure yet, its one by default
> - TIMER_STATS, needed for powertop, gives some usefull data even on
> non-x8
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-03 12:51]:
> > > running on a Broadcom SB1 *little endian* the kernel hangs trying to run
> > > init. The old 2.6.17 works (linux-image-2.6.17-1-sb1 version 2.6.17-5):
> >
> > The app
DE for systems without dcache aliases (which lacked
the necessary cache flush so far)
b) improves performance a bit, since some pages may never need a
cache flush
c) obsoletes local_flush_data_cache_page
Signed-off-by: Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Changed to avoid some compiler w
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:18:23PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > - Drop ext2 built-in exception for arm and mips.
> > Could we have a waver for the versatile flavour on armel until support
> > is added to d-i?
>
> There are almost 2 months left.
>
> > About mips/mipse
Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-sb1-bcm91250a
> Version: 2.6.24-4
> Arch: mipsel
>
> Hi,
> running on a Broadcom SB1 *little endian* the kernel hangs trying to run
> init. The old 2.6.17 works (linux-image-2.6.17-1-sb1 version 2.6.17-5):
Same for big endian.
[...]
> kjou
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-21 15:00]:
> > > linux-2.6 version linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.2~snapshot.10147
> > > FTBFS on mips:
> > > CC [M] drivers/net/niu.o
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-21 15:00]:
> > linux-2.6 version linux-2.6_2.6.24~rc8-1~experimental.2~snapshot.10147
> > FTBFS on mips:
> > CC [M] drivers/net/niu.o
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:293: Error: Branch out of r
Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:21:49PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > With proper support in the installer, different images, and even further
> > increased buildd time: Quite a lot.
>
> The point is that there are probably a lot ore IP22 old-r4k users t
Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:04:17PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Unless we use the compiler options mentioned before, which is probably
> > not sensible given the performance impcat for other machines.
> >
> > However, keeping the kerne
Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 05:54:52PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > That's a decision Thiemo would have to make. Thiemo, why is our IP22
> > > kernel 64 bit again?
> >
> > The idea is to provide 64-bit kernels where possible,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-23 17:59]:
> > SGI IP22 Indy r4k 100Mhz will not be able to boot unmodified 64bit
> > kernels. There are 64bit erratas for R4000SC Revision 3.0 which
> > prohibit running 64bit code without kernel and gcc modifications.
> > The
Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:11:53PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-18 19:02]:
> > > Version: 2.6.22-6
> > > the kernel linux-image-2.6.22-3-r4k-ip22_2.6.22-6_mips.deb dies
> > > early on an SGI IP22 (mips) with
> >
> > That's
Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 12:14:09PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >
> > Can you build a kernel from linux-mips git and see if that works?
>
> After trying to produce a new toolchain:
>
> net/sched/em_meta.c: In function 'meta_int_loadavg_0':
> net/sched/em_meta.c:127: e
Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 07:11:53PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-18 19:02]:
> > > Version: 2.6.22-6
> > > the kernel linux-image-2.6.22-3-r4k-ip22_2.6.22-6_mips.deb dies
> > > early on an SGI IP22 (mips) with
> >
> > That's
Federico Giacomini wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to build the kernel-image and headers .deb packages for a embedded
> system equipped with Debian etch.
> As the embedded processor is not much powerful (P III) and is too busy with
> several other tasks, I have to compile the kernel source (vanilla 2.6.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: -
Tags: patch
Hector Oron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build a gcc cross compiler package for i386->m68k but
> i get this error:
> ../../../src/libffi/src/m68k/ffi.c:13:26: error: asm/cachectl.h: No
> such file or directory
>
> Do you know where should be
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-11 14:33]:
> > I intend to fork 2.6.22 today. The last 2.6.21 upload should go into
> > lenny after all builds are available. So we should be able to
> > release 2.6.22 at the end of the week.
>
> mipsel fails to build the malt
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-28 14:32]:
> > Please find attached a patch to add a malta flavour to the linux-2.6
> > package on mips and mipsel. As the names says, it support the Malta
> > board, which is a development board produced by MIPS, and which ca
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-28 19:21]:
> > IOW, both flavours for now, and when the Malta Qemu emulation
> > stabilizes we can drop the Qemu-specific one.
>
> OK. What name do you want to use for this flavour? Just malta or
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-28 14:32]:
> > Please find attached a patch to add a malta flavour to the linux-2.6
> > package on mips and mipsel. As the names says, it support the Malta
> > board, which is a development board produced by MIPS, and which ca
maximilian attems wrote:
> hello,
>
> the vserver guys have fixes for sparc and s390.
> i expect them to be applied soonest.
> so the schedule for 2.6.18-5 upload would be tomorrow.
>
> nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies.
> the ia64 build fix is acked by dannf.
I plan to sne
Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
> > Come to think of it, this bug might have just appeared on alpha too:
>
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=387498
>
> No, it's not the same bug; the test case for system() works fine on my alpha
> when compiling with -pg.
My current guess about 3
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > If it is the consensus of the project that sourceless firmware doesn't
> > belong in main, this is a conscious regression in DFSG-compliance relative
> > to sarge. I don't think that's acceptable. We obviously do have the
> > means to remove
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am clueless with kernel programming. Still, I have came up with the
> following - hopefully straight forward - patch. Any comments?
The patch looks good to me, please send it to the upstream driver
maintainer.
I figure you want to have a look a http://www.kernelnewb
Bailey, Scott wrote:
> Just tuning in briefly to report:
>
> 1. I have been running my 3-processor Alphaserver 4100 with Ian's patch
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6275 for a little over a
> month now, first with 2.6.16 and now with 2.6.17, and it continues to
> work like a champ. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:06:44PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > enough time is lost with any of those dfsg firmware wankers,
> > that do _zero_ work upstream or on the licensing front.
>
> I repeat my offer to patch any (well, almost any) of these
> drivers to use
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[snip]
> http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing is grossly out-of-date, but I
> will integrate the relevant information from that in the process.
KernelFirmwareLicensing is supposed to track information about
mis-licensed firmware. IIRC you mentioned to have found a
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 04:53:51PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > No, because those are not linked together with the GPLed code, but are
> > > > a mere
> > > > aggregation of works inside the same media, i
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have several changes pending which require an ABI bump, or at least
> would cause the next upload to go through NEW:
>
> - xen images
> - merge of amd64 k8 and p4 flavours into one generic
> - smp-alternatives for amd64, dropping the UP flavours
> - change
tags +patch
thanks
This patch fixes sys_personality for the o32 emulation by
a) killing the sign extension bits
b) tighten the bitmask match for current->personality (like it is done
for x86_64)
Already submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thiemo
Signed-off-by: Thiemo Seufer <
maximilian attems wrote:
[snip]
> > No, it is not. As you may have noticed, we had a release update a few
> > days ago, telling people that we're currently planning to release with
> > 2.6.17. Though we're aware that it might be needed to update the kernel
> > in October, the current upstream relea
martin f krafft wrote:
> severity 380089 critical
> thanks
>
> 23:32:34 < vorlon> well, then that's a grave/critical bug on initramfs-tools
>for creating an unbootable system; it's not the package
>relationships themselves that make it RC
> 23:32:52 < madd
Jason Self wrote:
[snip]
> Please see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/07/msg00188.html
>
> And, as Brian Durant pointed out, this isn't just about the iMac G5
> but also the Power Mac G5 (PowerMac 9.1) as well. In fact, Debian
> chokes on most of Apple's newer PowerPC machines. I and
Bailey, Scott wrote:
> Funny this should come up now, just after my last note. I found a patch
> that looks better than mine in the report filed at
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6275 by Ian Dall. Alas, it
> was posted in March and hasn't seen any activity (including a response)
> sin
Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> >Jurij Smakov wrote:
> >[snip]
> >>There are a couple of patches for 2.6.16 which I would love to see
> >>included. There is a D-cache memory corruption fix included in 2.6.17
> >>(att
Jurij Smakov wrote:
[snip]
> There are a couple of patches for 2.6.16 which I would love to see
> included. There is a D-cache memory corruption fix included in 2.6.17
> (attached as sparc64-dcache.patch), which did not appear in a 2.6.16
> point release as I hoped. As it also affect the mips arc
Sven Luther wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know why i was banned from #debian-kernel and by whom,
By waldi, because your client disconnected/connected continuously for
several hours.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Frans Pop wrote:
[snip]
> IMO the question whether 2.4 should be removed now and if so for which
> architectures is something to be decided between the kernel team and
> porters.
> If a porter needs more time to switch to 2.6 for the installer, he should
> probably come up with a migration plan
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-16 17:04]:
> > > I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
> > > object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch?
> >
> >
dann frazier wrote:
> I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
> object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch?
Mips/mipsel d-i hasn't fully switched to 2.6 yet. Is there a urgent
need to remove 2.4 from etch?
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> hi Jack,
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:58:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm interested in installing Debian on a reiser4 root partition
> >
> > Are you aware of any work on a partman-reiser4 udeb?
>
> no, sorry.
>
> debian linux kernel guys vetoed reiser4
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:04:53PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > waldi why not add your patch to update-grub to the next stable release?
>
> Please keep in mind that you can't rely on a current sarge installation
> when it is upgraded to etc
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben:
> >
> > > > >what about that?
> > > > >
> > > > >debian-devel-kernel@
> >
> > > > I w
Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cord Beerman wrote:
>
> >what about that?
> >
> >debian-devel-kernel@
> >
> >Cord
>
> I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day
> it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer
> debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-de
maximilian attems wrote:
[snip]
> > - HZ_250 instead of HZ_1000: If I remember correctly, we kept HZ_1000
> > because it was the prior default. IMHO, we should follow upstream and
> > change the default to HZ_250 too.
> >
> > A short pro/cons is here: http://kerneltrap.org/node/5411
> >
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 13 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:28:56AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> That is stretching it. The third component of a version is
> >> hardly a "major" revision.
> >
> > Why?
>
> Component in a version are major.minor.su
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:18:41PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> >Package: mips-tools
> >Version: 2.4.27-11.040815-2
> >Severity: serious
> >
> >mips-tools doesn't build on powerpc and hppa; probably a bug in
> >kernel-package or something -- needs more investigation.
Horms wrote:
> 2.4.27-12 has been released into sid, this is a call to rebuild for all
> the different architectures. So far it is only available for i386 (which
> I built). I'll get powerpc rolling, I had mistakenly thought it was
> removed from Sid. Perhaps it should be, we can address that anoth
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
> > The upside is that the initramfs created should be more or less
> > identical for every system and is resilient against people moving the
> > drive from one machine to the other, doing perfect copies (using ghost,
> > dd, or whatnot), or using an already generated init
Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:38:36AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:35:09AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Hello,
>
> [snip]
>
> > > I'm pretty sure 2.4 currently FTBFS in sid. Looks like a tool
Erich Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
> > I'm not entirely sure which kernel config option this refers to, could
> > you dig that up? That not withstanding, your suggestion seems fine to
> > me, though I would appreciate some feedback from others. I've CCed
> > Manoj in case he has some oppinions.
>
> CONFI
reassign 333220 kernel-package 9.008
severity 333220 important
tags 333220 patch
thanks
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-xxs1500
> Version: 2.4.27-11.040815-2
> Severity: grave
>
> kernel-image-2.4.27-xxs1500 doesn't install. It seems kernel-package
> is confused as to the
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:46:01PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
> >
> > Accepted:
> > kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.13-1_i386.deb
> > to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.13-1_i386.deb
> > kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.13-1_i386.deb
> > to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ke
maximilian attems wrote:
> severity 330191 serious
> thanks
>
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
>
> > klibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
> > pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds.
>
> thanks for your report and duplicating, will look into it.
>
>
Horms wrote:
[snip]
> > > > As for if it is ready for upload? I am not sure. You are
> > > > the one propmoting uploading 2.6.12-7. I certainly think
> > > > that the addition of the 2.6.13.1 and 2.6.13.2 patches that
> > > > I added makes it more ready for upload. So if you though
> > > > it was r
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:37:02AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > > I have m
Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > I have made an i386 build of what is currently in SVN,
> > > its version is 2.6.12-6.hls.2005092100, but the
> > > version is the only thing I changed, just
A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
[snip]
> I think I'll just try building out of the linux-2.6 Debian source package.
>
> Where is the svn for Debian's linux-2.6 kernel tree?
http://svn.debian.org/ , Project "kernel".
> I'd like to run
> svn blame to see where the changelog line came from:
>
>- re
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
> > (Herbert did the same in woody-p-u with 2.4 backports, they had to be
> > removed before sarge at the price of some user confusion who had t-p-u
> > in their sources.list.)
>
> Well. The packages have smaller version than the sid ones, so there should be
> no such con
Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:14AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > > > http://packages.vergen
David Madore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
>
> Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
> I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the
> ot
tags +sarge
thanks
This bug only remains present in kernel revision -8 as used by
sarge's debian-installer.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi !
>
> dann frazier a écrit :
> >On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:22 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> >>We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
> >> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
> >>
> >>I can try to do hppa this afternoon; any word on m68k
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 25, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There are some architectures where 2.4 is required, its
> > because of these that it seems that we are stuck with 2.4 for Etch.
> > alpha (installer), m68k (2.6 only works on amiga), s390 (installer),
> > mips, mipsel
> Wh
dann frazier wrote:
> We're getting closer. Please check this for accuracy:
> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
>
> I can try to do hppa this afternoon; any word on m68k, mips & s390?
Big endian mips at http://people.debian.org/~ths/mips-kernels/sarge-security/
Thiemo
-
George B. wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-10
> Severity: important
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> Hello,
>
> Submitting as promised in #31763.
>
> The package depends on non-specific gcc. This is now gcc 4.0 by default.
> As discussed in #317637
Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:02:40PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:31:22PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > >
> > > On the topic of Sid, I think we need to keep 2.4.27 there for now.
> > > I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed
> >
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:40:12AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+securit
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >Calling it linux-headers-2.6.12-1-i386
> > doesn't work too well for all archs, since we end up w/
> > linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc, which conflicts w/ the name of a flavour.
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:32:33AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Right, but it still fails:
> > hattusa:~$ uname -r
> > 2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn
> > is also the same for both endiannesses.
>
> And the headers package is available fo
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 07:43:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r)
> > Fun, yet another thing in the common package which doesn't work for
> > mips (mipsel machines have "mips" as uname).
>
Jurij Smakov wrote:
[snip]
> I don't have any objections to this naming scheme (generally, I don't care
> about naming so much :-). The only thing which in my opinion _must_ be
> guaranteed, is that running
>
> apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r)
>
> will install the full set of packages
Andres Salomon wrote:
[snip]
> >> - Dependencies with arch spec for one-arch packages.
> >
> > Right, the control file is full of the packages with control fields like
> > this:
> >
> > Architecture: powerpc
> > Depends: initrd-tools (>= 0.1.78), coreutils | fileutils (>= 4.0),
> > module-init-
Andres Salomon wrote:
[snip]
> > It is IMHO not realistic to expect the rest of the world to wait for
> > some obscure subarchitecture.
>
> Who said we're going to wait for some obscure subarchitecture? We're
> going to keep working on kernels until we freeze for etch, at which point
> the su
Andres Salomon wrote:
> Alright folks, I think the packaging is ready to be beaten on by people.
> So, unless anyone has any concerns/problems/etc, I'm going to assume
> everything's a go for uploading 2.6.12.
>
> The current changes and state of the packaging:
> - source package is called linu
Ricky Chan wrote:
> I built debian 3.1 on mips raq2 cobalt with the well known buggy network
> card yesterday using the new installer rather then then old telnet
> method. However I got some unexpected results.
>
> The pings times to this box was less than 0.5ms which was fine, however
> as soon
Andres Salomon wrote:
[snip]
> >> >> * Older kernels get removed; no need to ask for manual removal of
> >> >> linux-kernel-2.6.12 after 2.6.13 becomes available for all archs.
> >> >> However, we lose the ability to have multiple 2.6's in a release,
> >> >> which sounds like a win t
Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:11:49 +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > Andres Salomon wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm going to suggest renaming our 2.6.12 source package from
> >> linux-kernel-2.6.12 to linux-kernel-2.6. Thou
Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to suggest renaming our 2.6.12 source package from
> linux-kernel-2.6.12 to linux-kernel-2.6. Thoughts? Dann Frazier and I
> have discussed this on IRC a little bit, and come up w/ the following
> points..
>
> * Source: linux-kernel-2.6, Version: 2.6.
Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
&g
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:12:21AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Most kernel hackers don't care that much about 2.4 any more.
>
> This is of course one of the reasons why users feel left alone by the
> kernel developers.
The gcc version recommended by
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > This week, we will change the GCC default versions from 3.3 to 4.0
> >>
> >> Would it break kernel 2.4 builds som
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This week, we will change the GCC default versions from 3.3 to 4.0
>
> Would it break kernel 2.4 builds somehow ?
> I've not been quite following; but the thread almost a month ago
> seems to indicate thus:
> http://www.kerneltraffic.org/kernel-traffic/kt20050701
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
> > > It would make little sense to do separate uploads for them.
> >
> > It is nevertheless necessary, according to the security team's historical
> > policy on security uploads. You can upload whatever you want to
> > testing-proposed-updates, *right now*, but it doesn
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > mips/mipsel has four additional changes which should go in sarge:
> > > > - Fix broken ptrace
> > > > - Fix Cob
Horms wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:07:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> > > the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel sou
Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
> > mips/mipsel has four additional changes which should go in sarge:
> > - Fix broken ptrace
> > - Fix Cobalt PCI bridge initialisation
> > - Work around crashes on Cobalt under I/O load
> > - Fix crash on startup on serial-less Cobalts
>
> All of which seem to be out
Horms wrote:
[snip]
> For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> they are using in Sarge:
>
> Base kernel source version of package in Sarge
> 2.4.27: alpha kernel-tree-2.4.27-9 (seems to be out
Jurij Smakov wrote:
[snip]
> >The thing is, that not all telnet-connections fail:
> >
> >- telnet to Linux-Host (try 'telnet mailgw1 25'): works
> >- telnet to Solaris-Host (try 'telnet esslingen'): works
> >- telnet to Ascend MAX4000 Access-Server (m-nas1): fails
> >- telnet to Cisco 7200 VXR (try
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
[snip]
> > Only for some m68k and sparc subarchitectures, and the m68k ones
> > have still no newer 2.4 version available. (Status as shown by
> > http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html)
>
> I beg your pardon?
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi.
>
> There are still many packages for 2.4.25 and 2.4.26 in unstable.
> Is there any reason not to file a bug against ftp.debian.org to
> remove these? I could take care of that if nobody from the kernel team
> has time to do it.
Only for some m68k and sparc subarchi
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Horms wrote:
> > > with 2.6.11.X, including the numbering (i.e. next upload should be
> > > kernel-source-2.6.11, package version 2.6.11.6-1).
> >
> > I agree it would be good to sync up the patches,
> > but I don't think there is any need
Horms wrote:
> I have finally finished wading through the bug reports and
> put togther kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 and
> kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 2.4.27-9.
>
> This update does _NOT_ contain ABI breakage,
> although one symbol has been added to the ABI.
> That is, the fix for CAN-2005-0449 has
Andres Salomon wrote:
[snip]
> Steve expressed concern about doing something like that (for
> obvious reasons); however, something to consider is using tcc for building
> modules. I have not tried it yet, but one of its touted features is its
> ability to compile a kernel in 10 seconds on a 2.4ghz
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
> a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
> (or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the
> available information to provide the needed file
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
