Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:04:17PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Unless we use the compiler options mentioned before, which is probably
> > not sensible given the performance impcat for other machines.
> > 
> > However, keeping the kernel for IP22 at 64 bit sounds valuable to me,
> > as most machines can make use of it.
> 
> Do you mean as a default ip22 image or as the only one?

I mean as the only one.

> How much work 
> would it be to also provive ip22-32 images? The config is basically the
> same except a single CONFIG item...

With proper support in the installer, different images, and even further
increased buildd time: Quite a lot.

Could you try if adding the compiler options I mentioned to the kernel
Makefile works for your machine?


Thiemo



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to