Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:04:17PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Unless we use the compiler options mentioned before, which is probably > > not sensible given the performance impcat for other machines. > > > > However, keeping the kernel for IP22 at 64 bit sounds valuable to me, > > as most machines can make use of it. > > Do you mean as a default ip22 image or as the only one?
I mean as the only one. > How much work > would it be to also provive ip22-32 images? The config is basically the > same except a single CONFIG item... With proper support in the installer, different images, and even further increased buildd time: Quite a lot. Could you try if adding the compiler options I mentioned to the kernel Makefile works for your machine? Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]