Control: reassign -1 src:linux/6.1.76-1
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 12:39:39 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad
> address) on most mips64el buildds
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 12:40:07 +0100, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
&g
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 15:31:55 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Do those GUI frontends that work via packagekit or other frameworks
> count as "using apt"?
Managing apt/dpkg packages via packagekit uses libapt-pkg6.0 (via
/usr/lib/*/packagekit-backend/libpk_backend_apt.so). I don't know whether
that's
Control: found -1 6.4.13-1
Control: found -1 6.5.1-1~exp1
On Fri, 08 Sep 2023 at 20:58:26 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Friday, 23 June 2023 16:36:37 CEST Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Source: linux
> > Version: 6.3.7-1
>
> Can you test whether the bug is still present
, LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages linux-image-amd64 depends on:
ii linux-image-6.3.0-1-amd64 6.3.7-1
linux-image-amd64 recommends no packages.
linux-image-amd64 suggests no packages.
-- no de
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 13:55:40 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I have uploaed this morning 5.15.5-1 to unstable and cherry-picked the
> mentioned commit as well.
This appears to work correctly as far as I can tell, and is included in
5.16-rc3, 5.15.6, 5.10.83, 5.4.163 and 4.19.219 upstream.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 20:55:06 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> And looks there is now a fix for it:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAOssrKez1mnF4rWRvWgk4LJ2iDfX8xkpMKvgprFt+-ARs83=n...@mail.gmail.com/
According to a Fedora kernel maintainer on that thread, that proposed
patch seems to w
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.15.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Control: affects -1 xdg-desktop-portal flatpak
Linux 5.15.3, 5.14.20 and other stable kernels are reported to have a
regression that causes Flatpak apps to freeze when using a FUSE filesystem
to load files from the host system. I
:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 10:21:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Recommend user.max_user_namespaces over
kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone
If I understand correctly, user.max_user_namespaces is an upstream kernel
feature, but kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone comes from
On Mon, 01 Feb 2021 at 11:49:25 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Simon" == Simon McVittie writes:
> I'm assuming that the proposal is to change this for bookworm.
I'm sorry, I don't have a concrete proposal, and I don't understand which
pack
On Mon, 01 Feb 2021 at 13:58:57 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Rationale: on sysvinit or runit systems, pid 1 is very simple and is
> unlikely to need to elevate any limits, but sysadmins are expected
> to restart system services in an unpredictable execution environment
> (certai
A recent regression in gnome-keyring (perhaps only on systems that
use dbus-x11, it isn't completely clear to me yet) has prompted me to
look at how rlimits work in Debian. It isn't clear to me which package
is or should be responsible for choosing what arbitrary limits we use
in practice.
The ker
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 at 19:43:22 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Am Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:55:36PM + schrieb Simon McVittie:
> > The simplest and most robust thing would be for bubblewrap to depend on
> > procps, and ship a file /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-bubblewrap.
Package: bubblewrap
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org
bubblewrap can operate in two modes:
- User namespace (Ubuntu, Fedora, RHEL >= 8): /usr/bin/bwrap is not setuid,
and relies on having a kernel that allo
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 03:09:25 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I don't think we should keep patching in
> kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone forever, so the documented way to
> disable user namespaces should be setting user.max_user_namespaces to
> 0. But then there's no good way to have a drop-in fi
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.137
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
The initramfs-tools autopkgtests now fail on arm64 (and would fail
on other non-amd64 architectures, if we had test runners for them)
because the test-dependencies are not installable. By default,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 02:52:11 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I think you've made a good case that user namespaces are likely to be a
> net positive for security on Debian desktop systems.
>
> This might not be true yet for servers that aren't container hosts.
Perhaps Debian's kernel should conti
Control: retitle 951697 GDM crashes with non-default i915 parameters on
dual-GPU system, NVIDIA proprietary + i915 + bumblebee
Control: reassign 951697 src:linux 4.19.98-1
On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 15:39:09 +0100, hardko...@gmail.com wrote:
> It works well on before upgrade kernel: 4.19.0-6-amd64
>
On Fri, 11 May 2018 at 20:44:50 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Firefox (and probably other applications) are using user namespaces these
> days to enhance the security.
>
> Debian is disabling these since 2013, the original patch states it's a
> short term solution, but we are here 5 years lat
isible again.
...
> Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 20:01:04 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Could this be <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1165>,
> possibl
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 09:07:02 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Feb 2019 at 18:16:41 +0100, Jean-Dominique Frattini wrote:
> > since the latest update of xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu and
> > firmware-amd-graphics [in buster], most GL appl
Control: reassign 921004 firmware-amd-graphics 20190114-1
Control: reassign 921145 firmware-amd-graphics 20190114-1
Control: forcemerge 921114 921004 921145
Control: retitle 921114 AMD Radeon RX 580: no GL display, "amdgpu: The CS has
been cancelled because the context is lost"
Control: tags 92111
Control: reassign -1 pinentry-gnome3 1.1.0-1
Control: affects -1 nfs-kernel-server gcr
I think this should be considered to be a pinentry-gnome3 bug rather than
nfs-kernel-server. I think the plausible routes forward are to either
escalate dbus-user-session from Recommends to Depends, downgrade th
Control: retitle 909770 i915: Does not show gdm greeter on eDP: Link Training
failed at link rate = 27, lane count = 2
Control: severity 909770 important
Control: reassign 909770 src:linux
Control: affects 909770 gdm3
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 13:22:37 +0200, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
> Note th
Control: severity -1 important
Control: retitle -1 Keyboard layout set in GNOME or with localectl does not
apply to initramfs LUKS prompt immediately
Control: reassign -1 gnome-control-center,systemd,cryptsetup-initramfs
On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 at 20:26:51 +0100, i...@laiho.me wrote:
> 1) The per-use
On Sat, 12 May 2018 at 18:26:11 -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> After upgrading my laptop from stretch to buster, I'm not able to mount NFS
> via
> mdns. I have the following entry in /etc/fstab:
>
> vanvanmojo.local:/mnt/storage /mnt/storage nfs4
> noauto,nofail,x-systemd.aut
Source: babeltrace
Version: 1.5.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
libbabeltrace1 (= 1.5.3-2) merges the contents of libbabletrace-ctf1 into
the libbabeltrace1 package. This makes packages like gdb uninstallable.
Similarly, libb
ckages initramfs-tools suggests:
ii bash-completion 1:2.1-4.3
-- no debconf information
>From b16674a06d27c1a8109424a0262c32320b7ab5c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:11:33 +
Subject: [PATCH] hook-functions: Ignore attempts to install the same firm
Control: clone 622394 -2 -3
Control: retitle -2 NFS mounts from /etc/fstab do not work
Control: submitter -2 m...@mattgrant.net.nz
Control: retitle -3 NFS exports fail due to rpcbind not starting before
nfs-common and nfs-kernel-server
Control: submitter -3 m...@mattgrant.net.nz
Control: tags -3 m
Control: reassign 767589 cryptsetup
Control: forcemerge 767832 767589
On 18/12/14 00:48, Arnaud Installe wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:53:35 +
> Simon McVittie wrote:
>> I think this may be the same thing as
>> <https://bugs.debian.org/767832>
...
>> It w
Riesebieter wrote:
> * Simon McVittie [2014-11-27 11:51 +]:
> > I think this bug report is actually describing more than one bug in more
> > than one package that have similar symptoms.
...
> > Elimar Riesebieter's "System 2" has a bunch of mdadm (RAID) partitio
On 27/11/14 20:09, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Right, adding root and usr raid partitions to INITRDSTART like
> "INITRDSTART='/dev/md3 /dev/md5'" or just 'all' does the job. There
> is no need to involve initramfs to mount /usr before init.
If your init is systemd, initramfs-tools >= 0.117 *does*
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 at 22:18:53 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I suspect this is essentially the same bug as #616689 and #678696,
> except that now it may affect mounting /usr as well as /.
I think this bug report is actually describing more than one bug in more
than one package that have similar s
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 at 11:50:40 +0100, Arnaud Installe wrote:
> After successfully unlocking and mounting root and swap devices, the system
> hangs a while, then drops to a rescue shell, with /usr, /var and /home not
> unlocked by cryptsetup. After manually running cryptsetup for the underlying
> d
ian/initramfs/cryptroot-script: decrypt /usr as well as / so that
+split-/usr will work with initramfs-tools (>= 0.118). (closes: #767832)
+
+ -- Simon McVittie Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:12:15 +
+
cryptsetup (2:1.6.6-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/initramfs/cryptroot-script: fix envir
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 at 10:02:34 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 at 22:21:16 +0100, zer0 divide wrote:
> > My system does not start automatically after I enter the password for
> > unlocking the root partition. I have to unlock manually /usr (from initramfs
>
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 at 22:21:16 +0100, zer0 divide wrote:
> I chose during installation luks partitioning (not lvm), and separated /boot
> (on an usb pendrive) partition from /root partition (on another drive with
> the other one).
That isn't a full description of what you did; I can tell because
On Sat, 08 Nov 2014 at 01:16:27 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 00:37 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > The symptom that *I* get on some boots is these messages in the NFS
> > client's Journal/syslog (my test-case for NFS is mounting one machine'
ut I also think it might be a red herring in terms of solving
this bug.)
On 07/11/14 20:23, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Bug M1, reported by Matthew Grant, present in 1:1.2.8-6: "NFS mounts
> from /etc/fstab do not work". (What symptoms? What error messages?) This
> one might be re
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.8-6
Severity: wishlist
Control: submitter -1 m...@mattgrant.net.nz
Control: block -1 by 756900
On Wed, 14 May 2014 at 11:15:19 +1200, Matthew Grant wrote:
> All the NFS RPC daemons have port activation in latest nfs-utils upstream, and
> service files. Please co
On 07/11/14 19:42, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 07/11/14 14:57, Chris Butler wrote:
>> Not sure that's the case. The systems where I was seeing the problem
>> are running:
>>
>> ii nfs-common 1:1.2.8-9
>> ii systemd 215-5+b1
>
> Your fstab sa
(Please keep the bug in Cc when replying to a bug, so it goes into the
bug record for other developers to refer to.)
On 07/11/14 14:57, Chris Butler wrote:
> > I think both of these might have been fixed by some combination
> > of fixing #510528, and changes in systemd v214 improving support
> > f
Control: tags 622394 + unreproducible
On Wed, 14 May 2014 at 11:15:19 +1200, Matthew Grant wrote:
> When running under systemd:
>
> o NFS mounts from /etc/fstab do not work.
>
> o NFS exports also fail due to rpcbind not starting before nfs-common and nfs-
> kernel-server
I think both of these
Source: linux
Version: 3.16.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
linux/3.16.7-1 has this change:
* [i386] Rename 486 flavour to 586, as it has not worked on 486 processors
since we enabled CC_STACKPROTECTOR (Closes: #766105)
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 at 09:42:16 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I was curious how systemd solved this. It's very simple: its equivalent
> of checkfs.sh (systemd-fsck@.service) runs something like
> "/lib/systemd/systemd-fsck /usr", which runs "fsck -M /usr", whic
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 at 08:20:17 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 at 10:02:59 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I didn't realise this patch [hadn't] been applied yet. It's the
> > first bit of the mounting /usr in the initramfs work.
I was curious how
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 at 21:45:56 -0400, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote:
> A clarification question: I see just the initramfs-tools package there. Past
> discussion on this ticket indicated that updates to sysvinit and util-linux
> were necessary too. A quick look suggests that's still the case. Are the
block 652459 by 697002
thanks
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 at 10:02:59 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 08:46:46PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > Wait... /usr I can see, but you can't have /etc on its own partition,
> > otherwise you would not be able to find /etc/fstab in order to find
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 at 13:30:54 +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> When will there be a non pea 3.x kernel like with the 2.6 kernel
> available in Debian?
>From the kernel changelog:
* [i386] Rename '686-bigmem' flavour to '686-pae'; remove '686' flavour.
For 686-class systems without PAE, the
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 at 00:53:26 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Via netconsole, I can bring you the attached logs (three separate bug/panic
> sequences).
>From the crash dump, I think this may be to do with IGMP. It started
around the time I added a Playstation 3 (which I believe uses
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.1.6-1
Severity: normal
When left idle, my laptop sometimes (a couple of times a day?) goes into a
"stuck" state with a crash dump printed to the framebuffer console and the
caps lock LED flashing. Sometimes the speaker plays a continuous tone.
I believe this is a kern
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 at 19:37:52 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Does this still occur with 2.6.32? If so, we should report it upstream.
I'll dig out my old 6233 and get back to you... there may be some delay while
I find it :-)
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.
submitter 430941 s...@debian.org
found 430941 2.6.26-12
thanks
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 at 23:19:18 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 06:16:40PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 at 16:28:15 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Thu,
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-4
Severity: normal
When using a 3G phone over USB for PPP connectivity, the kernel oopses if
the phone is accidentally unplugged (or, as in the attached log, its battery
runs out) before pppd has been terminated. After this happens, ppp does not
wo
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 at 16:28:15 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I have a cheap USB stick (an Integral 512M USB2.0 stick, specifically)
> > which appears with "unknown partition table" when inserted. If the
> >
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686
Version: 2.6.21-5
Severity: normal
I have a cheap USB stick (an Integral 512M USB2.0 stick, specifically)
which appears with "unknown partition table" when inserted. If the
BLKRRPART ioctl is issued, the partition table is re-read correctly,
/dev/sdx1 appears, HAL
+
From: Simon McVittie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux-2.6: snd-powermac should depend on i2c-powermac
Package: linux-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #356933
I also experienced the modprobe segfault and kernel Oops reported in bug
56 matches
Mail list logo
