Debian kernel-config file for Linux 6.3

2023-05-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 07:48 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Ben and Debian kernel team, > > Today, I have seen on salsa.d.o there is some progress/update in > master Git branch to use Linux 6.3 > > Can you give help and/or instructions on how to generate a Debian &g

Re: Debian kernel-config file for Linux 6.3

2023-05-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 4:18 PM Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 07:48 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi Ben and Debian kernel team, > > > > Today, I have seen on salsa.d.o there is some progress/update in > > master Git branch to use Linux 6.3 &g

Re: Debian kernel-config file for Linux 6.3

2023-05-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 4:18 PM Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 07:48 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi Ben and Debian kernel team, > > > > Today, I have seen on salsa.d.o there is some progress/update in > > master Git branch to use Linux 6.3 &g

Debian kernel-config file for Linux 6.3

2023-05-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Ben and Debian kernel team, Today, I have seen on salsa.d.o there is some progress/update in master Git branch to use Linux 6.3 Can you give help and/or instructions on how to generate a Debian kernel-config file? Alternatively point to a URL or provide such a kernel-config file? Thanks in ad

Re: [builddeb] dpkg: error processing package linux-image-6.2.0-rc4-1-amd64-clang15-kcfi (--configure)

2023-01-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
This solved the issue: # mv /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms.orig # LC_ALL=C dpkg -i /home/dileks/src/linux/linux-image-6.2.0-rc4-1-amd64-clang15-kcfi_6.2.0~rc4-1~unstable+dileks1_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 426963 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing t

Re: Upgrade of single Linux v6.1.0 (unsigned) package from Debian/experimental fails

2022-12-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
Sorry, here the relevant part of ERROR quote: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms: dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.1.0-0-amd64:Sign command: /lib/modules/6.1.0-0-amd64/build/scripts/sign-file Binary /lib/modules/6.1.0-0-amd64/build/scripts/sign-file not found, modules won't be signed

Upgrade of single Linux v6.1.0 (unsigned) package from Debian/experimental fails

2022-12-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, this was possible with linux-image-6.1.0-0-amd64-unsigned (6.1~rc8-1~exp1) but fails now with linux-image-6.1.0-0-amd64-unsigned (6.1.1-1~exp2): root# LC_ALL=C apt-get install -o APT::Get::Upgrade-By-Source-Package=0 -t experimental linux-image-6.1.0-0-amd64-unsigned -y ... Use 'apt autoremov

Bug#1014319: depmod: WARNING: could not open modules.builtin.modinfo at /var/tmp/mkinitramfs_vBlw4a/lib/modules/5.18.0-2-amd64: No such file or directory

2022-07-10 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, with the fix from Sven Joachim applied to mkinitramfs I do not see the warning of kmod-30. Feel free to add my: Tested-by: Sedat Dilek # Debian/unstable AMD64 Thanks. Regards, -Sedat-

Bug#982304: linux-headers-5.10.0-3-amd64: File include/generated/autoconf.h missed to compile virtualbox-dkms

2021-03-02 Thread Sedat Dilek
If you like you can close this bug-report. linux-headers-5.10.0-4-amd64 version 5.10.19-1 ships the necessary files and I was able to build virtualbox-dkms kernel-modules: root# LC_ALL=C ll /lib/modules/5.10.0-4-amd64/updates/dkms/ total 852K drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Mar 3 04:00 . drwxr-xr-x

Bug#982304: linux-headers-5.10.0-3-amd64: File include/generated/autoconf.h missed to compile virtualbox-dkms

2021-02-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
I checked the filelist from [1]: # echo $files /usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.0-3-amd64/include/generated/asm-offsets.h /usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.0-3-amd64/include/generated/autoconf.h /usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.0- 3-amd64/include/generated/bounds.h /usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.0-3-amd64/include/ge

Bug#982304: linux-headers-5.10.0-3-amd64: File include/generated/autoconf.h missed to compile virtualbox-dkms

2021-02-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
Package: linux-headers-5.10.0-3-amd64 Version: 5.10.13-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: sedat.di...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Today, I tried to build virtual-dkms from Debian/unstable against linux-headers-5.10.0-3-amd64. This breaks here, thus I filed Debian Bug #982301: "virtualbox-dkms: Err

Re: [linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64] Requirement of pahole binary with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y

2021-01-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:05 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:33 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:29 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021

Re: [linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64] Requirement of pahole binary with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y

2021-01-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:33 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:29 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:57:43AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > yesterday, I installed

Re: [linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64] Requirement of pahole binary with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y

2021-01-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:29 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:57:43AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > yesterday, I installed linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64 version 5.10.5-1 > > from Debian/unstable. > > > > I am

[linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64] Requirement of pahole binary with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y

2021-01-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, yesterday, I installed linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64 version 5.10.5-1 from Debian/unstable. I am building custom Linux-kernels mostly to test with LLVM/Clang and use Debian's kernel-config file as a base for my work. With CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y there is a requirement for pahole binary from dwa

Bug#955469: initramfs-tools-core: Enable zstandard support

2020-08-04 Thread Sedat Dilek
Now in Linus Git tree. [1] says: Merge tag 'x86-boot-2020-08-03' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 boot updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main change in this cycle was to add support for ZSTD-compressed kernel and initrd images. ZSTD has a very fast decompressor, yet

Bug#955469: initramfs-tools-core: Enable zstandard support

2020-08-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 12:27 AM Norbert Lange wrote: > > Am Fr., 31. Juli 2020 um 16:48 Uhr schrieb Sedat Dilek > : > > > > Just FYI: > > > > Version 10 was now accepted in . > > > > Let's hope this will get into upcoming Linux v5.9. > &g

Bug#955469: initramfs-tools-core: Enable zstandard support

2020-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
Just FYI: Version 10 was now accepted in . Let's hope this will get into upcoming Linux v5.9. - Sedat - [1] https://github.com/terrelln/linux/commits/zstd-v10 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=x86/boot

linux-image-5.6.0-trunk-amd64-unsigned: Please enable CONFIG_VBOXSF_FS as module

2020-04-18 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, can you please enable CONFIG_VBOXSF_FS as module? $ grep VBOX /boot/config-5.6.0-trunk-amd64 CONFIG_DRM_VBOXVIDEO=m CONFIG_VBOXGUEST=m # CONFIG_VBOXSF_FS is not set Not sure if virtualbox-guest-* like virtualbox-guest-dkms Debian packages are then co-installable and co-usable. Thanks. Rega

diffconfig: config-5.5.0-2-amd64 VS. config-5.6.0-trunk-amd64

2020-04-18 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to this ML ] Hi, I installed linux-image-5.6.0-trunk-amd64-unsigned (5.6.4-1~exp1). When I compare the Kconfig changes between linux-image-5.5.0-2-amd64 (5.5.17-1) with above I see this diff: $ cd /path/to/linux $ scripts/diffconfig /boot/config-5.5.0-2-amd64

Bug#955469: initramfs-tools-core: Enable zstandard support

2020-04-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, thanks Norbert for taking care. I had a similar approach for Debian's userland tools when testing version 3 of "Add support for ZSTD-compressed kernel and initramfs" against Linux v5.6. Norbert's patch seems to include what I have in [1] (includes my README_zstd-v3.txt). I am running both Z

Bug#947356: realtek-firmware: missing rtl8125a-3.fw

2020-03-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, with linux-image-5.4.0-4-amd64 version 5.4.19-1 from Debian/testing AMD64 I can confirm this. I did this to fix it: root# cd /lib/firmware/rtl_nic root# wget https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/plain/rtl_nic/rtl8125a-3.fw NOTE: Might need to do `upda

Bug#902966: pstore: crypto_comp_decompress failed

2018-07-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I can confirm to see this on Debian/buster AMD64 with... linux-image-4.17.0-1-amd64 (4.17.8-1) ...and removing all dmesg-efi-*.enc.z files in /sys/fs/pstore/... ...and rebooting made the failures in dmesg go away. Not sure what 'gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file' means exactly in th

Re: dkms: Build with an alternative like compiler rather than gcc

2018-07-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:43 PM, wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Sedat Dilek [mailto:sedat.di...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 9:41 AM >> To: Limonciello, Mario >> Cc: p...@hungry.com; da...@debian.org; a...@debian.org; >&

Re: dkms: Build with an alternative like compiler rather than gcc

2018-07-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
culano >> Cc: Dynamic Kernel Modules Support Team; debian-kernel@lists.debian.org >> Subject: Re: dkms: Build with an alternative like compiler rather than gcc >> >> >> [Sedat Dilek] >> > As a workaround I have symlinked my mycompiler wrapper-script to >> > /

Re: dkms: Build with an alternative like compiler rather than gcc

2018-07-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Sedat Dilek] >> As a workaround I have symlinked my mycompiler wrapper-script to >> /usr/bin/gcc. That works. >> >> What is the recommended way to do this correctly? > > Perhaps you should use dpk

dkms: Build with an alternative like compiler rather than gcc

2018-07-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am experimenting with clang to compile an upstream Linux kernel v4.14.y (here: y=54). For this I use bindeb-pkg make-target from Linus upstream. After installing the generated linux-headers and linux-image amd64 packages, the dkms kernel-modules were built with gcc-7 which defaults to gcc.

[linux-stable-3.16.y] tun: allow positive return values on dev_get_valid_name() call

2018-05-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Ben, some Debian/jessie systems were caught by the bug-report in [1]. This issue was recently fixed in an updated Debian kernel for v3.16.y. Will you include the patch "tun: allow positive return values on dev_get_valid_name() call" [2] in linux-stable-3.16.y upstream? This was a fix for "tun

Bug#897685: linux-image-3.16.0-6-amd64: Unable to start multiple KVM instances with libvirt

2018-05-08 Thread Sedat Dilek
-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1602078.html [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/log/?h=v3.16.56 -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen, Sedat Dilek Telefon: +49 2166 9901-153 E-Mail: sedat.di...@credativ.de Internet: https://www.credativ.de/ GPG

[Best practice] Testing custom patchset

2018-01-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I wanted to build a Debian-kernel by applying Linux v4.14.13-rc1 patchset against linux (4.14.12-2) from Debian/unstable. My system is a Debian/stretch AMD64. I consulted the Debian-kernel handbook [1] to do this the "Debian way". The patchset was extraxted as a series from linux-stable-rc.g

Re: [debian/stretch64] lxc-copy: Snapshot with OverlayFS backingstorage fails with Linux-4.9.y

2017-11-03 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:45:52AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ Please CC me - I am not subscribed to lxc-users and debian-kernel MLs ] >> >> Hi, >> >> I am playing with LXC and OverlayFS. >> >

[debian/stretch64] lxc-copy: Snapshot with OverlayFS backingstorage fails with Linux-4.9.y

2017-10-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ Please CC me - I am not subscribed to lxc-users and debian-kernel MLs ] Hi, I am playing with LXC and OverlayFS. The Debian-kernel shipped with stretch64 fails when using lxc-copy for a snapshot. Later I tried the latest Debian-kernel from stretch-backports APT-repository [0] and the issue doe

Re: linux-image-3.18.0-trunk-amd64 (3.18.5-1~exp1)

2015-02-06 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am comparing my own kernel-config with the ones from Ubuntu and Debian. Just curious for what "0" stands in "3.18.0-trunk"? ABIVER? It's reflecting v3.18.y where y=5 and it should be "3.18.5-trunk-amd64"? Thanks for clarification. Regards, - Sedat - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-k

Bug#759809: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: USB 3 devices fail, logging "xHCI xhci_drop_endpoint called with disabled ep ffff8802165db0c0"

2014-11-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Henrik Størner wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01-11-2014 kl. 19:07 Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 14:56 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Sedat Dilek &g

Bug#759809: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: USB 3 devices fail, logging "xHCI xhci_drop_endpoint called with disabled ep ffff8802165db0c0"

2014-11-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [...] >> The problem was solved by updating to linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 >> (3.2.63-2+deb7u1). >> > > Just for the sake of completeness (and for Jari)... >

Bug#759809: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: USB 3 devices fail, logging "xHCI xhci_drop_endpoint called with disabled ep ffff8802165db0c0"

2014-11-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: [...] > The problem was solved by updating to linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 > (3.2.63-2+deb7u1). > Just for the sake of completeness (and for Jari)... Here I have an ASM1042 chipset... [ lshw -sanitize ] ...

Bug#759809: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: USB 3 devices fail, logging "xHCI xhci_drop_endpoint called with disabled ep ffff8802165db0c0"

2014-11-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > this looks like what I reported in "[wheezy][linux-3.2.60] Booting > from a Debian system on an external USB-3.0 hdd hangs" (see [1]). > > Unfortunately, there is no newer 3.2.y kernel for wheezy available [2

Re: [wheezy][linux-3.2.60] Booting from a Debian system on an external USB-3.0 hdd hangs

2014-11-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ Please CC me - I am not subscribed to this ML ] > > Hi, > > I cannot boot with my current linux-3.2.y Debian/wheezy kernel as my > system hangs and reports xhci problems. > ( Unfortunately, nothing in the logs and no p

Bug#759809: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: USB 3 devices fail, logging "xHCI xhci_drop_endpoint called with disabled ep ffff8802165db0c0"

2014-09-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, this looks like what I reported in "[wheezy][linux-3.2.60] Booting from a Debian system on an external USB-3.0 hdd hangs" (see [1]). Unfortunately, there is no newer 3.2.y kernel for wheezy available [2]. Henrik, did you try a Linux-kernel >= 3.2.61 (self-compiled)? Thanks. Regards, - Seda

[wheezy][linux-3.2.60] Booting from a Debian system on an external USB-3.0 hdd hangs

2014-08-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ Please CC me - I am not subscribed to this ML ] Hi, I cannot boot with my current linux-3.2.y Debian/wheezy kernel as my system hangs and reports xhci problems. ( Unfortunately, nothing in the logs and no picture from my screen for you ). FYI: My system and bootloader etc. is on an external US

Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: Build linux-tools package with 'make deb-pkg'

2013-04-10 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ CCing some involved maintainers and MLs ] Hi Joerg, what is the status of your proposal patch? Is this [1] the last version you posted? What's with the integration into linux-kbuild? Background of my asking is that I need to build cpufreq-info shipped with the kernel-sources in tools-dir to t

Bug#695182: [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps

2013-01-16 Thread Sedat Dilek
2013 >> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:25:41 +0100 >> Subject: Re: [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps >> From: Sedat Dilek >> To: paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au, Paul Szabo >> Cc: LKML , linux-mm , >> Ben Hutchings >> >> Hi Paul, >> &

[PATCH] linux-tools: Add xz support

2012-08-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
path/to/linux-3.5.tar.xz $ fakeroot debian/rules orig $ debuild Tested against linux-tools SVN trunk revision 19348. Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- debian/bin/genorig.py | 18 -- debian/rules |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH] Support to extract upstream xz-compressed tarballs

2012-08-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- debian/bin/genorig.py |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/bin/genorig.py b/debian/bin/genorig.py index 30a2e75..856d5eb 100755 --- a/debian/bin/genorig.py +++ b/debian/bin/genorig.py @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ class Main(object

Re: Mini-Howto: Build linux-kbuild-3.5

2012-08-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 23:22 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> today, I was discussing with Michael and at some point he was >> complaining about the missing linux-kbuild-3.5 package in the Debian >> soft

Re: Mini-Howto: Build linux-kbuild-3.5

2012-08-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to debian-kernel ML ] > > [ QUOTE ] [...] > Thanks for writing this up. Maybe you would want to put this up on wiki. > http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPac

Re: Mini-Howto: Build linux-kbuild-3.5

2012-08-18 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to debian-kernel ML ] [ QUOTE ] On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:52 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > today, I was discussing with Michael and at some point he was > complaining about the missing linux-kbuild-3.5 package in the > Debian software a

Mini-Howto: Build linux-kbuild-3.5

2012-08-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
. Regards, - Sedat - #!/bin/sh # Filename: Mini-Howto_Build_linux-kbuild-3-5.txt # Author: Sedat Dilek # Created: 17-Aug-2012 # Last Changed: 17-Aug-2012 # NOTE-1: Source for linux-kbuild-3.5 Debian binaries is linux-tools! # NOTE-2: linux-headers-3.5

Re: [linux-2.6] 3.1.0-1: Cosmetic fix: [SCSI] Silencing 'killing requests for dead queue'

2011-12-07 Thread Sedat Dilek
UPDATE: Fix will be in linux-3.1.5 as scsi-silencing-killing-requests-for-dead-queue.patch [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=blob;f=queue-3.1/series#l52 On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I had these "scsi: killin

[linux-2.6] 3.1.0-1: Cosmetic fix: [SCSI] Silencing 'killing requests for dead queue'

2011-11-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I had these "scsi: killing requests for dead queue" in linux-next for a while. It's fixed there and in mainline, now. Unfortunately, I saw these message when booting into linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae. The upstream fix is commit 745718132c ([SCSI] Silencing 'killing requests for dead queue').

Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix flavours in [686-pae_xen] define

2011-07-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 16:35 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek >> --- >>  debian/config/i386/defines |    3 +-- >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --gi

Re: [debian-kernel] RT patchset v3.0-rt3 for i386 against vanilla Linux-3.0

2011-07-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
As an addendum: ARCH="i386" FEATURESET="rt" # Generate missing linux-headers-*-common package fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_${ARCH}_${FEATURESET}_real - Sedat - 2011/7/24 Sedat Dilek : > Hi, > > I played a bit with the new Real-Time (RT) featureset

[PATCH] i386: Fix flavours in [686-pae_xen] define

2011-07-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- debian/config/i386/defines |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/config/i386/defines b/debian/config/i386/defines index 466949b..a2da916 100644 --- a/debian/config/i386/defines +++ b/debian/config/i386/defines @@ -43,8

Bug#624372: linux-source-2.6.39: Fix warnings for invalid symbol values (now boolean)

2011-04-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Package: linux-source-2.6.39 Version: 2.6.39~rc4-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, attached patch against debian-dir from linux-2.6/trunk (r17251) fixes these warnings: .config:555:warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for LEDS_CLASS .config:917:warning: symbol value 'm' invalid for

Re: build-system: Interaction changelog <-> abiname?

2011-03-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ Please CC me I am not subscribed to the list ] > > [QUOTE] > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> linux-2.6 (2.6.39~rc1-1~next20110331.dileks1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > This version spli

Re: build-system: Interaction changelog <-> abiname?

2011-03-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to the list ] [QUOTE] On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > linux-2.6 (2.6.39~rc1-1~next20110331.dileks1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low This version splits into "2.6.39~rc1" and "1~next20110331.dileks1". > $ hea

build-system: Interaction changelog <-> abiname?

2011-03-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am using a slightly modified version of the kernel-buildsystem from trunk which you offer to build my linux-next kernels. Unfortunately, even I use UNRELEASED as Distribution my $ABINAME is not accepted, I have these setttings: $ head -1 debian/changelog linux-2.6 (2.6.39~rc1-1~next2011033

[linux-2.6] trunk-r16272: Fix up some configs and speakup patch broken for 2.6.36-rc4

2010-09-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
gards, - Sedat (aka dile{ks,X} on IRC) - P.S.: Yes, I know 2.6.36-rc4 support is WIP (UNRELEASED). From 244692cc6f6fad05d1058bf9ca123535d8014368 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sedat Dilek Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 05:46:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Replace CONFIG_INOTIFY by CONFIG_FANOTIFY --- debian/c

Re: Single kernel variant: Missing linux-headers-*-common package

2010-08-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I have uploaded my linux-2.6 and linux-kbuild-2.6 Debian packages for i386 to [1]. As single-kernel-variant I used i386_none_686. My linux-image contains 2.6.35.1 patch from upstream and stable-queue-2.6.35 patch-series from [2],[3]. I have tested with compat-wireless [4] against linux-heade

Re: Single kernel variant: Missing linux-headers-*-common package

2010-08-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
d, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:16:20AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> +# Single kernel variant: Create missing linux-headers-*-common package. >> +install-headers_$(ARCH)_$(FEATURESET)_$(FLAVOUR): >> install-headers_$(ARCH)_$(FEATUR

Re: Single kernel variant: Missing linux-headers-*-common package

2010-08-10 Thread Sedat Dilek
v2: - Set "install-headers_$(ARCH)_$(FEATURESET)_$(FLAVOUR): install-headers_$(ARCH)_$(FEATURESET)" *before* not after the install-headers_$(ARCH)_$(FEATURESET)_$(FLAVOUR) block - Replace removes via "forced-symlinks" - Sedat - On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Sedat Dilek wr

Single kernel variant: Missing linux-headers-*-common package

2010-08-10 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, while studying the kernel-buildsystem from the Debian Kernel Team and their Wiki pages, I came accross of a known issue. [0] says: "Problem: In this case, linux-headers-2.6.24-1+foo.1-common will be missing. One needs to invoke the binary-arch_i386 target, which will yield all feature sets (X

Bug#582906: 2.6.32-5-686: iwl3945_request_scan( ) - kernel NULL pointer dereference

2010-05-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-13 Severity: normal Tags: sid Additional informations: Hi, I encountered a kernel NULL pointer dereference in iwl3945_request_scan() in linux-image-2.6.32-5-686. This is a known issue [1] and was reported in Intel Linux-Wireless BTS #2208 [2]. [3] gives a

Bug#574526: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message not needed

2010-03-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
t; , "John W. Linville" , "sta...@kernel.org" , Wey-Yi Guy On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22:14AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > only to clarify: > There is no need for "iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message" patch > from wireless-2.6 GIT? > > I mean &qu

Bug#574526: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: iwlagn flood in dmesg: free more than tfds_in_queue

2010-03-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Ben, there is patch pending in wireless-2.6 master GIT branch [1]: commit c8406ea8fa1adde8dc5400127281d497bbcdb84a "iwlwifi: Silence tfds_in_queue message" Also, it would be fine to see "[2.6.32] iwlwifi: fix nfreed--" in debian's 2.6.32 kernel. Kind Regards, - Sedat - [1] http://git.kernel