On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 10:52 +0100, Robert de Bath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Robert de Bath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
What do you mean, reinstate? This is the same behaviour you get at
present. Well, here's a new ve
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Robert de Bath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I had an idea how to unblock this, and finally got round to trying it,
and it seems to work. That is, we build in x32 support but require a
run-time parameter to enable. So, please try the attached patch
upport-conditional.patch
quilt push
Will try this "shortly". Though I may have to spin up a "VM" to build it.
--
Rob. (Robert de Bath )
<http://www.debath.co.uk/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 20:22 +0100, Robert de Bath wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
But that's rather different to now enabling x32 in the arch=amd64 kernel
which is what #708070 is about. Likewise creating a new
flavour=x86,arch=
turned on ?
--
Rob. (Robert de Bath )
<http://www.debath.co.uk/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
ant
any of the contents of the package to be installed.
All you do is give equivs the name and version (and any of several other things
you may want) of the package you want to fake then install the "fake" package
it generates.
Problem solved. Bug 583849 FIXED.
--
Rob.
anyway.
IIRC: ARM needs frame pointers, Spark always has frame pointers.
--
Rob. (Robert de Bath )
<http://www.debath.co.uk/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
7 matches
Mail list logo
