On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 20:22 +0100, Robert de Bath wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
But that's rather different to now enabling x32 in the arch=amd64 kernel
which is what #708070 is about. Likewise creating a new
flavour=x86,arch=amd64 kernel.
What the people responsible for the x32 arch on debian-ports do wrt an
arch=x32 flavour is up to them, but that's the situation analogous to
what you are referring to.
Ian.
I was referring to the package that's now called
linux-image-3.14-1-amd64:i386 not linux-image-3.14-1-amd64:amd64
The equivalents would be approximatly linux-image-3.14-1-x32:amd64 and
linux-image-3.14-1-x32:i386 not any packages in the new port.
Frankly when Ben said "... those where the administrator actually wants to
support x32." I took that to be him hinting that there would be such a
package "shortly" so the administrator could make the choice easily.
As that doesn't seem to be the case I decided to speak up; but now I'm
wondering where you're going with this?
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to 708070-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org.
--
Rob. (Robert de Bath <robert$ @ debath.co.uk>)
<http://www.debath.co.uk/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.02.1407242120100.25477@mayday
