Bug#415904: #415904: Reopened, updated patches to remove firmware blobs and to make driver available

Patches for Linux 2.6.22/2.6.23: ftp://flower.upol.cz/dts/lin0001_ti-usbserial/patches/fix-reconfig.patch ftp://flower.upol.cz/dts/lin0001_ti-usbserial/patches/v94_ti-usbserial.patch (Review from The Linux USB (and all other) Maintainer Forever is ass usual

Bug#434752: Kernel hangs when I echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled

* Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:21:49 +0200 > > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.22-2 > Severity: normal [--] > Summary: echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/vdso_enabled hangs my kernel. > > Since some months, I get unusable backtraces from gdb; I was pointed at > an OpenSuse bug at: >

Killing tained reports before sending (Re: Bug#424881: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686-bigmem: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1572)

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:09:43PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:08:29PM +0200, Philipp Kolmann wrote: > > since my machine crashed for the third time with this slab.c bug on the > > console, I thought I post this now: > > The kernel is tainted. No support. What about

Re: Critique of NO_HZ and thoughts about power savings (Re: 2.6.21)

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:16:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:06:38AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > * From: Folkert van Heusden > > * Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:18:40 +0200 > > * Organization: www.unixexpert.nl > > > > > >> &g

Critique of NO_HZ and thoughts about power savings (Re: 2.6.21)

* From: Folkert van Heusden * Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:18:40 +0200 * Organization: www.unixexpert.nl > >> > > > Please consider upgrading to 2.6.21 or backporting the NO_HZ >> > > > functionality as it reduces powerusage of a processor and thus saves >> > > > the >> > > > environment. >> > > sinc

Bug#417333: FYI, may be have similar problem on another type of HW

> From: Olivier Berger > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#417333: FYI, may be have similar problem on another type of HW > Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:35:28 +0200 > > Hi. > > FYI, I entered a report (#417333) for a problem which show traces > similar to that one... Well, i

Re: 2.6.20 [was Re: 2.6.21-rc5 ]

01-04-2007, maximilian attems: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > >> I'm running it nearly five days. I'm on amd64, without sysfs, did some >> dvd burning, playing music have strange random glitches (maybe some >> more NO_HZ problems). >> >

Re: 2.6.21-rc5

> From: maximilian attems > Subject: 2.6.21-rc5 > Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:22:38 +0200 > > any voices against basing trunk on latest upstream? I'm running it nearly five days. I'm on amd64, without sysfs, did some dvd burning, playing music have strange random glitches (maybe some more NO_HZ prob

Re: sk98lin vs skge driver

> From: Len Padilla > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: sk98lin vs skge driver > Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:13:55 +0200 Please, see and comment Bug#416200: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Missing sk98lin module. Backport of the fiber support is impossible due to workqueue changes,

Bug#416210: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 startup logs

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:32:11AM +0200, Grzegorz Szyszlo wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > OK. I don't have experience with such hardware. > > > > Try to select modules you need for basic boot, i.e. don't use > > MODULES=most in init

Bug#416210: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 startup logs

On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:17:43PM +0200, Grzegorz Szyszlo wrote: [] > I attach full boot console. > First is 686 kernel. At the end boot is hanging, but I can > ctrl+pgup/pgdown, and alt+ctrl+del reboot server immediately > Next is 486 startup and last stopping messages. This works ok. > > I'm no

Bug#416388: linux-source-2.6.18: Wodim hangs and system may freeze

> From: John Talbut > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#416388: linux-source-2.6.18: Wodim hangs and system may freeze > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:47:21 +0100 > > Thanks, Oleg, that has made a bit of difference. > > I did: > hdparm -d0 /dev/cdrw > in a root terminal > > and

Bug#416388: linux-source-2.6.18: Wodim hangs and system may freeze

> From: John Talbut > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#416388: linux-source-2.6.18: Wodim hangs and system may freeze > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:41:42 +0100 > > Package: linux-source-2.6.18 > Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 > Severity: important > > > This is similar to 265747,

Re: Automated kernel configuration and installation tool

> From: "Rafa? Jasinski" > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Automated kernel configuration and installation tool > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:56:55 +0200 > Hallo. I'm a little lkml and debian-kernel *reader*, sometimes hacking on things i like, and replying on bugreports i th

Bug#415239: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: general protection fault from powernow-k8

On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:49:30PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: [] > I tried the 2.6.20 package from buildserver.net. It crashed similarly. > Yes I had the nvidia driver loaded as usual :-| Full dmesg and without nvidia, please. > I will try upstream 2.6.20 asap. Latest upstream is 2.6.21-rc5 (:

Bug#416210: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Hangs at initrd boot state [i386] dual PentiumIII chipset ServerWorks OSB4

> System: fresh pure install, all tasks from tasksel. On install state > I hadn't any problems, but next boot cause any big problem for me: > > Kernel 2.6.18-4-486 works ok, but it has only ONE processor support and > is slower. What kernel fully worked for you last time? > Kernel 2.6.18-4-686 h

Bug#416200: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Missing sk98lin module.

> From: Andrew Nady > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#416200: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Missing sk98lin module. > Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:41:49 -0400 > Organization: Primary Support Systems Inc. [] > As mentioned before. In the older kernel (2.6.18-3), most likely due t

Bug#251023: upstream status of acpi-dsdt-initrd patch

> From: dann frazier > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#251023: upstream status of acpi-dsdt-initrd patch > Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:53:58 -0600 > > hey, > I did a little research this morning to try to formulate an opinion - > here's what I found:[...] A little bit out

Bug#415904: [Linux, ti_usb-serial] Removing (obsolete) firmware blobs, making driver usable (without udev scripts)

Package: linux-source-2.6.18 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 Severity: important Tags: patch 1) In current form, i.e. without udev scripts, driver is unusable. 2) Two binary firmware blobs for different devices are staticaly included in the driver. While they are written to be GPL, Windows(R) driver

Re: the -12 question

> From: dann frazier > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: the -12 question > Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:44:08 -0600 [] > * I also propose we use the requirements in my etch-updates proposal >for fixes (must have bug filed, must be important or greater) Is it possible to hav

Bug#415239: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: general protection fault from powernow-k8

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:54:55PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: [] > It runs perfectly stable after 'cpufreq-set -g performance', so I don't > think I can rule out the cpufreq stuff. Or ACPI, or SMP PREEMPT. > > Can you redo your previous observations without taining also? Maybe > > powernow-k8

Bug#415239: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: general protection fault from powernow-k8

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:50:10PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:52:37PM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote: [] > > Try to not use proprietary modules, powernowd daemon (use ondemand > > driver) and reproduce that. > > OK, I will try all that asap (tomorrow

Bug#415239: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: general protection fault from powernow-k8

> From: Hamish Moffatt > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#415239: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: general protection fault > from powernow-k8 > Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:20:50 +1100 > > Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 > Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11 > Severity: normal > > I'm

ti_usb, firmware loader: decision from the driver author (Re: [patch 03/05] ti_usb, device setup: without any artificial errors, use configuration changing)

Dear Debian kernel team, this is decision of the driver author himself. These corrections are to be made for upstream tree, thus, i think, it's OK to conform patch quality for you. Signed-off-by: Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Forwarded message from Al Borchers <[E

Bug#413736: usb: no configuration chosen from 1 choice

> From: maximilian attems > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#413736: usb: no configuration chosen from 1 choice > Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:43:26 +0100 > > tags 413736 wontfix > stop > > On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Nick Shaforostoff wrote: > >> kernels beginning with 2.6.16 have

[patch 04/06] ti_usb, changing firmware: adopting userspace helper

pp-by: Oleg Verych --- drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c | 148 +- drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.h | 27 +++--- 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) Index: linux-source-2.6.18/drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.h

[patch 06/06] ti_usb, copyright update: if it deserves

pp-by: Oleg Verych --- drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c |4 ++-- drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.h |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Index: linux-source-2.6.18/drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c

[patch 02/06] ti_usb, cleanup: comments, whitespace

* Al Borchers remains one to bother with this driver, * shell script is not needed in comments. pp-by: Oleg Verych --- drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c | 73 +- drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.h |3 - 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 64

[patch 03/06] ti_usb, kconfig: describe firmware files in userspace

pp-by: Oleg Verych --- drivers/usb/serial/Kconfig | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: linux-source-2.6.18/drivers/usb/serial/Kconfig === --- linux-source-2.6.18.orig/drivers/usb/serial

[patch 01/06] ti_usb, usbcore: help drivers to change device

he code could be put into that driver instead of the core. However I'm submitting it for the core, on the theory that if one driver can find a use for it, other ones eventually will too. - Yes, usbcore design is "a bad idea", thus we must accept this crutch! comment-by: Oleg Ve

[patch 05/06] ti_usb, device setup: without any artificial errors, use configuration changing

pp-by: Oleg Verych --- i.e. no more uGLYdev with sysfs Alan, i'm looking forward to deal with this crutch :-E drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: linux-source-2.6.18/drivers/usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5

[patch 00/06] ti_usb, usb-serial: firmware in userspace, new setup/configuration, small cleanup

Thankfully to Al, who have some time to test this, i'm pleased to send this patch proposition. Debian. This update eliminates need of udev/sysfs reconfiguration, thus no udev package patches needed. Firmware files from standard driver package from TI must be copied or symlinked to /lib/firmware.

2.6.18.8 stable++ (Re: Bug#406111: Pretty please, backport!)

> From: maximilian attems > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#406111: Pretty please, backport! > Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:53:01 +0100 Hallo. [] > the etch kernel is frozen. > nevertheless cherrypicking the important patch may qualify for > a stable release update. Just

Bug#307517: [ Bug#409934: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686-smp: system crash with message "kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:407"]

> From: dann frazier > Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel > Subject: Bug#307517: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#409934: > kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686-smp: system crash with message "kernel BUG at > mm/rmap.c:407"] > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:02:41 -0700 > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686-smp > Ver

Re: [patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

Hallo, Al. After your comments (mostly minor) about patch, you've said, that you will try to test it. Did you manage to do so or not? I'm going to send you whitespace-cleanup.patch, req_firm.patch, will you accept and test them? Maybe it will be accepted to the Debian. TIA. -- -o--=O`C #oo'L O

ti_usb's firmware (Re: Solving the linux-2.6 firmware issue)

Hallo. On 2007-01-06, Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [] > > > Now, removing all these drivers is a workaround so we can release ASAP. > > The real solution needs to be addressed after the release, as was > already stated in the discussion prior to the GR: > > - have vendors re-releas

Re: [patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

On 12/20/06, Al Borchers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oleg -- Quoting Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 12/16/06, Al Borchers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * +#define TI_3410_EZ430_ID 0xF430 /* TI ez430 development > tool > > */ > >

Re: [patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

On 12/16/06, Al Borchers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oleg -- Some comments. I will be away until next Tuesday, when I can do more with this. Thanks. * We can't remove the compiled in firmware--that would break things until users get and install the firmware images. * What I did in my pat

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

On 12/15/06, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 10:30 schrieb Oleg Verych: > On 12/14/06, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > Hallo. Due to very big distance

Re: [patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

On 12/14/06, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > Hallo. Due to very big distance to my usual work stand, please accept this. Hm, I don't think this driver is "orphaned". Please work with Al to get this ac

[patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

Hallo. Due to very big distance to my usual work stand, please accept this. -- -o--=O`C #oo'L O <___=E M usb-serial-ti_usb-move_firmware_to_userspace.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: Bug#396185: sky2 freezes in 2.6.17-2-686. Maintainer confirms that it should be fixed in 2.6.19-git tree.

On 2006-11-18, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: [] > Hopefully they both are fixed in 2.6.18-2. > I will set it up as soon as time permits (it is my main desktop, which > is rarely turned off) and report if problem still persists. Note, that actual version is 2.6.18-5, and will be -6 next week. 2.6.18-2 is

[patch] ti_usb id (Re: preparation for 2.6.18-6 kernel upload on monday 20th of november 2006.)

On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 12:58:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 09:53:28AM +0000, Oleg Verych wrote: > > On 2006-11-16, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Hi, ... > > > > > > As you may know, or not, we are waiting for the abi-breaking 2.6.18-6 to

Re: preparation for 2.6.18-6 kernel upload on monday 20th of november 2006.

On 2006-11-16, Sven Luther wrote: > Hi, ... > > As you may know, or not, we are waiting for the abi-breaking 2.6.18-6 to be > uploaded for pushing the 2.6.18 kernel into etch. > > It seems 2.6.18.3 is announced for saturday, so this would mean a natural > tentative schedule of let's say monday the

Bug#398360: Default 2.6 kernel image throws a "kernel BUG" when accessing a USB-Harddisk

Hallo. Dominik Schulz wrote: [] > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-386 > Version: 2.6.8-16sarge5 > > When accessing an external IDE-HDD connected via USB the kernel throws > an "kernel bug" message and > the access to the drive is delayed. > > I am using a Debian 3.1 sarge installation without any ba

Re: Mounting UFS under Linux with R/W

On 2006-11-04, Alien wrote: > > --=BoundaryHOT1162626664.65-- > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I did not seem to find this topic in this list - I hope it is the right > place to discuss that. > > > > The problem is  -  m

Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3

On 2006-10-31, maximilian attems wrote: [] >> May i ask, what is general rules to accept changes? > you didn't look at the wiki heh > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines Thanks. >> For example .19-rc linux kernel has some valuable cha

Re: Bug#396185: sky2 network driver freezes

On 2006-10-30, Adrian Johnson wrote: [] > Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-amd64 > Version: 2.6.18-4~snapshot.7648 > > I have experienced a network freeze of the sky2 network driver > The console error message is: > NETDEV WATCHDOG : eth0: transmit timed out > sky2 eth0: tx timeout > sky2 hardwa

Re: Schedule for linux-2.6 2.6.18-4

On 2006-10-30, Frederik Schueler wrote: [] > I personally have somewhat lost the overview on on open issues being=20 > busy with RL work the past 2 weeks, so I would like everyone of you to > compile a short list of things you have on your agenda for 2.6.18-4,=20 > and generally before the release.

Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3

Hallo, Frederik. On 2006-10-10, Frederik Schueler wrote: [] > > As usual, if someone needs more time for pending changes, drop a line. May i ask, what is general rules to accept changes? For example .19-rc linux kernel has some valuable changes in drivers, that can support more hardware (in my c

Bug#390541: .17-.19-rc1 fails to detect PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15, .16 works fine

Jens, please, help to sort out this one. 2.6.19-rc1 was tested with no luck. Bug's thread with more logs is here: Thanks. On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:26:51PM +0200, Georg Wittenburg wrote: > Hi Oleg > > Sorry for taking so long t

Re: Bug#390695: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: weird messages upon loading the CD-ROM driver[1~

On 2006-10-06, Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05.10.06 Oleg Verych ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:49:58AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > Hi, > >> > Are the ready made Debian packages or do I have to build myself? >&

Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.

On 2006-10-08, John Kelly wrote: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 14:57:46 + (UTC), Oleg Verych >>And this is possible without any *firmware* in debian/main and >>installation process. > > Many things are possible for those doing the work. Are you doing the > work? Maybe, yes. Th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.

On 2006-10-08, John Kelly wrote: > On 2006-10-07, Oleg Verych wrote: > >> binary-firmware must be removed, or 15+ years of Debian are wasted > > If you want to re-live the past 15 years, take your own advice: > >> let them have own built kernel > > and do it yourse

Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.

On 2006-10-07, Sven Luther wrote: > Removing every firmware which is distributed as hexdump only will > cripple the kernel to an extent where it becomes unusable for most of > our users, because popular network and scsi devices are among the [IMHO, of course] Sorry, but *most* here isn't right wo

sky2 stops working 2.6.17 or ethernet driver crashes 2.6.18

[Let me CC, you guys. If not, please, reply with NACK. Thanks.] Two debian bugs Bug#390248, Bug#391382 are about failing sky2 under load. Please see, bugs.debian.org or i can forward every mail separately here. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel/22665 http://permalink.gm

testing kernels (was Re: Bug#390616: linux-image-2.6.18: Enable ATA-Security for Sid kernels)

Hallo. On 2006-10-05, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:56:04PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: >> that is _not_ massive testing. >> massive testing would be to have an debian-installer rc, >> with the specific option turned on. for that it is to late >> as the next d-i won't use 2.

Bug#390695: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: weird messages upon loading the CD-ROM driver[1~

On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:49:58AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > Are the ready made Debian packages or do I have to build myself? I will, but it will be my first one (in the .deb). And i don't know how it will run, because i must cross compile on x86-64. Anyway, lets see what will happen ;) Gen

Bug#390695: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: weird messages upon loading the CD-ROM driver

On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:32:51PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03 2006, Oleg Verych wrote: > > Hallo. > > > > [Jens, let me cc you.] > > It's an ide core thing, not an ide-cd problem. Perhaps Alan or Bart has > a good idea. OK Hilmar, 2.6.19-rc1 is

Bug#390541: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: 2.6.17 fails to detect PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15, works fine with 2.6.16

On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:30:13PM +0200, Georg Wittenburg wrote: > Hi Oleg! > > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 16:24, you wrote: > > On 2006-10-02, Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [.] > > Please don't be so selfish ;), attach full bootlog (dmesg + mount output). > > Here i see hdb, that m

Re: Bug#390695: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: weird messages upon loading the CD-ROM driver

Hallo. [Jens, let me cc you.] On 2006-10-02, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686 > Version: 2.6.18-2 > Severity: minor > > Upon loading the driver for the CD-Rom on my Notebook the driver spits out > weird messages. I'm attaching the relevant part of dmesg. The part of the

Re: Bug#390541: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: 2.6.17 fails to detect PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15, works fine with 2.6.16

On 2006-10-02, Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Doesn't seem like it was fixed in 2.6.18 (from linux-image-2.6.18-1-686),=20 > unfortunately. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ egrep "ide.?:|hdb" dmesg-2.6.18 > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=3D= > xx >

need distro people opinion on config.gz changes

Andrew Morton wants opinions on resent changes in upstream: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/452074 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Probles with Core Duo processor

On 2006-10-01, Christian Schuerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Bastian, > > On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:20, Bastian Blank wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 10:49:59AM +0200, Christian Schuerer wrote: >> > ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x1008 >> > ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0 >> > ACPI: 2 du

Re: Bug#390541: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: 2.6.17 fails to detect PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15, works fine with 2.6.16

On 2006-10-01, Georg Wittenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 > Version: 2.6.17-9 > Severity: normal [-0-] > Kernel 2.6.17 (from linux-image-2.6.17-2-686) fails to detect the > build-in PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K15 drive of my Sony VAIO FS295XP laptop. > This worked fine

Re: kernel 2.6.17.10

On 2006-10-01, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got source of 2.6.17.10 from kernel.org! > > Then i have created a deb file with following command: > > cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.17.10 > > make menuconfig maybe here. If you have GRUB, it's very easy to figure out. If initrd was load

Re: Bug#390314: linux-image-2.6-amd64: does not boot on M2NPV-VM

On 2006-09-30, Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 > Version: 2.6.17+2 > Severity: normal > > Hi DDs, > > kernel 2.6.17 in the amd64 flavour still doesn't come up on my Asus > M2NPV-VM, while 2.6.16 worked, as well as 2.6.17 in 32 bit. So... It's also known

Re: Bug#390248: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: sky2 ethernet driver crashs kernel when transfering lots of data

On 2006-09-30, Lionel Landwerlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Subject: Bug#390248: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686: sky2 ethernet driver crashs > kernel when transfering lots of data > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:04:15 +0200 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Archived-At: >

Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops

On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:19:07PM +0200, Dan Ohnesorg wrote: > Dne Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:23:15PM +0200, Oleg Verych napsal: > > > Let's add XFS team in CC. > > There isn't Yes, my MUA... > > > On 2006-09-24, Dan Ohnesorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops

Let's add XFS team in CC. On 2006-09-24, Dan Ohnesorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64 > Version: 2.6.17+2 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system More details, please. What happend before this boot? Why ext3 is recovering? > raid1: raid set md

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

Due to return -ENOPATCH, don't CC lkml please. Hallo, On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:30:25PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 29 August 2006 04:15, Oleg Verych wrote: > > James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 02:35 +

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:14:30AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:51:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:15:49AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: request_firmware() is dead also. YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:51:03PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:15:49AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > >>request_firmware() is dead also. > > >>YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel. > > >>And pl

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

James Bottomley wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 02:35 +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: request_firmware() is dead also. YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel. And please don't add new useless info _in_ it. I er don't think so. Hell, what can be as ea

Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:11:42PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > I've tested this with the aic94xx driver using the new MODULE_FIRMWARE() tag. Initramfs should be much easier because it already includes most of the boot time loading; all it has to do is the piece identifyi