Am 17.04.11 06:01, schrieb Thomas Goirand:
I have an old laptop with a bad internal WiFi board, so I bought a newer
RaLink driver. To make it work, I had to add the option "rt2800usb -
Include support for rt33xx devices (EXPERIMENTAL)" and "rt2800usb -
Include support for rt35xx devices (EXPERIME
Hi Dann,
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> 2) After that upload, I will file an RC bug to request the removal of
> the drbd8-source binary from the drbd8 source package
I finally found time to upload drbd8 with the -source package dropped.
Do you intend to upd
Hi Dann,
Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 16:09 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:31:20AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > I'd appreciate it if an existing drbd user could test it.
>
> I didn't hear back from the drbd maintainers, but I did get some
> testing feedback from a drbd
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92n
Hi,
in 0.92m, the timeout for ipconfig in scripts/functions was set to 60
seconds. This broke our iscsi-rootfs setups.
It took me a while to debug this, but it seems that 60 seconds is not
enough for switches which have spanning-tree enabled, they need som
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:32 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[...]
> Does this match other people's interpretations?
Yes.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 01:33 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Norbert said he was going to contact the upstream maintainer of the driver,
> but there's no information about what came of that.
Unfortunately I never got a reply.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 15:43 +0100, Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
> Or would it be possible to have the Areca driver backported to the
> Debian 2.4.18 kernel?
The Areca driver is part of the Debian kernel since 2.6.18-2.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
* Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
> Norbert, do you have any further thoughts on this?
It's still on my radar, I hope to find some time to take a closer look
at it next weekend.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
* Andras HORVATH wrote:
> linux-image-2.6.18-4-alpha-smp still suffers from "Could not
> allocate X bytes percpu data" when loading modules (for example,
> xfs, eepro100 and e100).
>
> I've found this discussion (regarding the previous version,
> linux-image-2.6.18-3-alpha-smp):
> http://www.mail
tags 409222 +moreinfo
thanks
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> adds nearly two minutes to the boot time as the timeouts on both
> ata1 and ata2 are nearly 50 seconds - 30 seconds waiting time each
> plus several 5 second retries.
Sounds like #391867 which was fixed in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9, pleas
* Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
> Targeting this kernel for etch would be appreciated.
It is targeted for etch.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:56:55AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > Modified:
> >dists/sid/linux-latest-2.6/debian/templates/control.source.in
> > Log:
> > Add myself to uploaders.
>
> No.
>
> You are listed as alpha
* Michael Richters wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:23:44PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Michael Richters wrote:
> > > I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian
> > > kernels cannot access /dev/rtc:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROT
* Michael Richters wrote:
> I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels
> cannot access /dev/rtc:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]
> # hwclock --show
> select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out
>
> This same error occurs when the system is booting.
Could you please retr
* Michael Richters wrote:
> I have a Dell PowerEdge 860, and the current stock Debian kernels
> cannot access /dev/rtc:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]
> # hwclock --show
> select() to /dev/rtc to wait for clock tick timed out
>
> This same error occurs when the system is booting.
Same here on a Dell O
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
[...]
> The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes.
Is there a new schedule already?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote:
> Could not allocate 16 bytes percpu data
2.6.18-2 and newer include a workaround for this problem.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch
>
> It's on my TODO list for this weekend.
This patch gets us back to the Relocation overflow problem, which was
al
* David Lazar wrote:
> Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version
> 2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620.
Could you please try if the kernel from
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/linux-2.6/i386/
fixes this problem? If it works for you, I'm going to add this patch
to 2.6.18-
* Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Friday 15 December 2006 18:08, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
>
> which version of the patch is it? >2.0.2.2-rc6 and <2.0.2.2-rc9 has
> a critical bug which causes kernel oops if there is other traffic
> while restarting vservers.
http://
* Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > If you have any last minute changes which are that important they
> > cannot wait for the first point release kernel, please list them
> > here so we can discuss them.
>
> You may want to apply this patch. This problem was reported before
>
* David Lazar wrote:
> Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version
> 2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620.
Same hardware here, same problem.
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13408
If this patch is part of 2.6.19 or 2.6.20, it should be added.
Norbert
--
* maximilian attems wrote:
> nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies.
Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* maximilian attems wrote:
> nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies.
Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Falk Hueffner wrote:
> This updated patch instead of alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch should
> help:
Are you going to add this patch to the next gcc-4.1 upload?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> - alpha gcc-4.1 migration
It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move
alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > Log:
> > Switched alpha to gcc-4.1, bumped ABI revision.
>
> I don't see a discussion about the ABI name change.
There was a discussion about switching alpha to gcc-4.1 about two
weeks ago.
> I revert that.
The
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs
> testing: http://people.debian.org/~falk/alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch
Included in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-12 22:52]:
> > * Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > Anybody can run a build and make th
* Jurij Smakov wrote:
> What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
Yes.
> Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
Tomorrow.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Linux 2.6.18 has been released, and it looks like we can do a first
> upload today.
Is there an .orig.tar.gz already?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* maximilian attems wrote:
> > It didn't fix the problem.
>
> one first shot would be to lower CONFIG_NR_CPUS in config.alpha-smp
Tried that already.
> or otherwise one could use a similar hack than the one proposed here:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115507250028744&w=2
Didn
* Andras Horvath wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new
> > kernel currently...
It didn't fix the problem.
> if that's 2.6.17-2 then I'm sorry to report that -smp still doesn't
> work (same
* Steve Langasek wrote:
> Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > #369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols;
> > fails to allocate percpu data
>
> The alpha smp kernel didn't work in sarge either. I would suggest
> dropping this flavor until someone steps up to maintain it.
Agreed, I'm
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Andras Horvath wrote:
> > but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems..
>
> Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend.
I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new kernel
currently...
Norbert
* Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this
> > > have to be solved quickly.
> >
> > Aha.
>
> Really?
No.
Norbert
--
To
tags 369517 +confirmed
thanks
* Andras Horvath wrote:
[...]
> but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems..
Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this
> > > have to be solved quickly.
> >
> > Aha.
>
> How is the alpha-vserver flavour coming along? ;-)
It's still on my todo li
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> The following arches did not yet switch to gcc-4.1:
> - alpha
Linux 2.6.17 doesn't compile with gcc 4.1 on alpha.
> At least alpha seems to be in an unmaintained state, and this have
> to be solved quickly.
Aha.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After repeating my question a few times, I was able to deduce from
> Bastian's one-word replies that he talked to someone else on
> ftp-master team and was assured that the rejection of sparc binaries
> was still possible.
Bastian tends to ignore uncomfortable question
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > What is the status of the other architectures?
> >
> > alpha
>
> Test-build is running currently.
2.6.17 is ready on alpha, kernel built and works fine.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> What is the status of the other architectures?
>
> alpha
Test-build is running currently.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
owner 304330 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
owner 333695 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> As there was no progress over 2 months in this two ITP and the
> kernel team was asked to provide support for the kernel included
> iscsi support, I overtake both ITP in favour of the kernel team.
Next t
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:47:43PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
> > After the upgrade to 2.6.16 (from 2.6.15), I started seeing the
> > following errors during boot:
>
> rerunning alsaconf fixes this.
No, it doesn't, I'm still seeing these errors during boot after
re
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha fails to build in unstable.
Yes, I know. I have an update ready, but I didn't upload it yet
because it's seems to be that we're removing 2.4 from etch.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to upload 2.6.17-rc3 to experimental next monday,
> this leaves 4 days for preparations.
I have no chance to update the alpha configs before leaving to
debconf6, and I'm not sure if alpha available there, so I don't
know if I'm able to update the configs.
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > > I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were
> > > > uploaded.
> > >
> > > There was.
> &
Currently the linux-patch-debian-* and linux-support-* packages
depending on python2.4-minimal.
According[0] to Steve, the python-minimal package should not be
used as a dependency by other packages. I think it's the same for
python2.4-minimal.
Norbert
[0]: http://lists.debian.or
Hi,
2.6.16.10 was just released, hence I'd like to upload 2.6.16-10 as
soon as possible (tomorrow), to fix the FTBFS on alpha.
Any objections?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were
> > > uploaded.
> >
> > There was.
>
> Where?
Bastian? I'm still interested where t
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:34:06AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > No. My Alpha needs 18 hours for building all three flavours which
> > are available for alpha.
>
> Which sort of machine?
EV56, 433 MHz, 192 MB RAM.
> What happens if you u
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Do we have the resources to check the next upload for all
> architectures within a day or two?
No. My Alpha needs 18 hours for building all three flavours which are
available for alpha.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were
> > uploaded.
>
> There was.
Where?
> > 2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just
>
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> Don't upload 2.6.16-10 without any notice.
I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded.
2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just wanted
to fix it.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
tags 364206 +pending
thanks
* Nicholas Riley wrote:
> The 2.6.16.6 patch contains a reference to "for_each_possible_cpu",
> which is not present until 2.6.17. It should be replaced with
> "for_each_cpu". This causes the package to fail to build on Alpha.
Thanks, I added your patch.
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> The backports.org archive carries current versions of most needed
> packages to run new kernels on Sarge but some of them (eg
> initramfs-tools) are outdated,
That's because backports.org is based on testing, not unstable.
It's the same reason why 2.6.16 isn't available o
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> As of now, the following architectures still need updated configs:
>
> alpha
Nope, buildd had no problems.
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=linux-2.6&ver=2.6.16-1&arch=alpha&file=log
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> The svn branch to be used is dists/trunk/linux-2.6/
It's based on 2.6.15-3, what about the changes in -4, -5, -6 and the
not yet uploaded -7?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
It's currently not possible to build linux-2.6 with testing, because
2.6.15-4 build-depends on kernel-package (>= 10.029), but testing has
9.008.4. Looks like the testing scripts don't consider build-depends.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
reassign 352274 udev
severity 352274 minor
thanks
* Mikael Nilsson wrote:
> I'm getting a *long* list of udev errors on boot, like:
>
> udevd-event[xxx]: run_program: exec of program '/lib/udev/udev_run_hotplugd'
> failed
>
> and so on.
This is a (harmless) issue in udev, reassigning.
* Freels, James D. wrote:
> The way the patches are made available, one must apply the patch to
> the entire level zero (2.6.15) source. Is there a way to
> incrementally patch to minimize the compile time?
You could use interdiff (from the patchutils package) to create an
incremental patch.
Norb
* Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias wrote:
> I guess the controller goes offline when doing the initrd with
> yaird, so maybe some sysfs poking by yaird is the cause. This seems
> very bizarre.
I just uploaded a backport of klibc and initramfs-tools, could you try
to rebuilt the initrd with initramfs-too
* Sven Luther wrote:
> matroxfb is problematic, since the matroxfb maintainer didn't agree
> on the 2.4->2.6 fbdev API change, and thus things broke all over,
> and has a huge patch that reverses the new fbdev stuff. At least
> this was the case a year or two back at least.
Last time I tried matro
* James McCaw wrote:
> Since upgrading to kernel 2.6.15 (from 2.6.14) I now get this kernel
> message consistently when running fgl_glxgears (provided by fglrx
> driver package) or standard glxgears. It may be an error with the
> binary fglrx driver, but given the specific reference to
> mm/swap.c:
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Alpha was switched to the generic irq framework a few hours ago in
> the git-tree. I'm thinking about adding that patch to 2.6.15-2.
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=eee45269b0f5979c70bc151c6c2f4e5f4f
tags 339080 +pending
thanks
* Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Looking through the kernel surces of the different architectures I
> have seen that almost all architectures use the same irq.c code. In
> newer kernels (> 2.6.8) for example x86, ia64, amd64, powerpc,
> parisc change to a generic IRQ handler co
reassign 346141 yaird
severity 346141 important
merge 341524 346141
thanks
* Fabien COUTANT wrote:
> You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version
> 2.6.15-1-k7-smp) on a machine currently running kernel version
> 2.4.31-k7-smp.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341
severity 346107 normal
reassign 346107 klaptopdaemon
merge 337502 346107
thanks
* Jim Hague wrote:
> On Thursday 05 Jan 2006 18:25, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote:
> > > after upgrading I am not able to suspend to ram anymore
> > > (
* Marco Presi (Zufus) wrote:
> after upgrading I am not able to suspend to ram anymore
> (/proc/acpi/sleep is missing).
What's wrong with /sys/power/state?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Packaging at least -rc kernels for unstable might be a good idea for
> Debian too. That would provide more testing coverage for -rc releases,
> and this is what upstream needs the most.
We already had some -rc releases in experimental for 2.6.14 and
2.6.15.
Norbert
--
T
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> The following architectures need their configs still to be
> updated:
>
> alpha
Current svn (and rc7.experimental1 too) builds fine on alpha.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.42
Severity: normal
I gave initramfs-tools a new try on my alpha, but it failed to create
a working initrd:
SCSI subsystem initialized
qla1280: QLA1040 found on PCI bus 1, dev 8
scsi(0:0): Resetting SCSI BUS
scsi0 : QLogic QLA1040 PCI to SCSI Host Adapter
* Horms wrote:
> * Recently fixed, in the most need of testing
> kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha
> kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha
I'm going to take a look at those next weekend.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I switched the alpha build from gcc-3.3 to gcc-4.0 in the not yet
uploaded 2.6.14-3, and Jurij said he'll also switch sparc from gcc-3.3
to gcc-4.0.
How to handle these ABI changes for specific architectures?
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.12-10
Can you please give 2.6.14-2 a try?
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:46:19PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > Please stop with these unannounced (and seemingly arbitrary)
> > moves. They add unnecessary confusion and I (and likely others)
> > find it frustrating.
>
> Hu? It disappeared without notice.
It was announ
* Sven Luther wrote:
> ALERT!: /dev/hda1 does not exist, Dropping to a shell!
I saw the same on my notebook (i386) when using MODULES=dep in
initramfs.conf.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:32:05AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > would it be possible to apply the following patchlet to
> > /srv/svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/hooks/post-commit?
[...]
> Sure, though I don't seem to be able to check hooks/post-commit out
> :(
You have to login at costa
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Kim Hansen wrote:
> > The quota support for XFS is gone in the newest kernel. The reason
> > (bug in configfile) and fix is explained here:
> > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.3/1153.html
>
> Thanks, I hope this wil
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now there is shown as the content of
> /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-1-686/.extraversion
> 2.6.14-1-686
>
> This is the full version, rather than the persumably desired
> EXTRAVERSION component
This is fixed in 2.6.14-2 from unstable.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSC
* Kim Hansen wrote:
> The quota support for XFS is gone in the newest kernel. The reason
> (bug in configfile) and fix is explained here:
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0510.3/1153.html
Thanks, I hope this will get fixed in 2.6.14.1, so it's not worth to
add a new patch to svn yet
* roberto wrote:
> i am looking for the latest downloadable kernel-source-2.6.x package
> for sarge, but i did not find anything later than 2.6.8 in
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages.en-gb.html#search_packages
The kernel-source package is architecture independent, you can use the
one from u
* Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> $ -depmod -a
> zsh: command not found: -depmod
>
> if it is a shell command that won't work.
>From the GNU make documentation:
,
| To ignore errors in a command line, write a `-' at the beginning of
| the line's text (after the initial tab).
`
http://www.cs.
* Anand Kumria wrote:
> I can recall quite a number of incident where i've moved a disk from
> an athlon k6 to k7 (and vice versa) and found random failures until
> I picked the right kernel package.
Hu? Running a k6 kernel on a k7 shouldn't be a problem.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
* Sven Luther wrote:
> but alpha, hppa and arm all three had commits fixing the FTBFS a few
> hours after the upload, so as soon as we get confirmation of the
> build success, we can do -2.
Confirmed for alpha, 2.6.14-2 builds fine.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Horms wrote:
> I've put the packages in
> http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6-2.6.13+2.6.14-rc4/
> incase they dissapear from other sources.
The ABI revision in the version number is missing in those packages.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Horms wrote:
> I am, right at this moment, building 2.6.13-1.experimental.1, and
> assuming the i386 build completes I will upload. I already know it
> doesn't compile on HPPA, and I expect other FTBFS.
It will fail on alpha too, I hope I'll find time next weekend to
update the configs.
Norbert
* Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > * Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is
> > > to not have it require any further backports.
> >
> > Jus
* Andres Salomon wrote:
> I'm working on a backport of linux-2.6 for volatile; the goal is to
> not have it require any further backports.
Just for info, I already prepared a backport of linux-2.6 for
backports.org, but I used a backported kernel-package for the build.
http://www.backports.org/pe
* Allyn, Mark A wrote:
> Does anyone know what the plans are for 2.6.13, which is now
> available from www.kernel.org? I notice that unstable (sid) is still
> at 2.6.12.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/09/msg00458.html
> I have just subscribed to this email list; I apologize if this
>
* Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several
> times), but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to
> manually edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive
> any notice why the menu.lst would not be touched.
Have you tried to
* Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I just installed the above-named kernel package (tried several
> times), but the grub menu.lst is not updated, so unless I start to
> manually edit it, I cannot use the kernel. I also did not receive
> any notice why the menu.lst would not be touched.
Have you tried to
* dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 11:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > 2.4.27 is building.
>
> And done:
> http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel/sparc/2.4.27
Works fine on my sparc64.
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Horms wrote:
> > 2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security
> > 3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security
>
> Builds finished on alpha.
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/alpha/sarge/
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
* Holger Jaekel wrote:
> Building kernel 2.6.8 with gcc 4.0.1 gives an error. Package
> dependencies should be changed.
2.6.8 is already marked for removal from unstable. Please use 2.6.12,
which works fine with gcc 4.0.
Thanks, Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
* Horms wrote:
> 2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security
> 3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security
Builds finished on alpha.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Horms wrote:
> I've been told that the s390 installer works it, and its needed for
> some m68k flavours (mac users who want a working keyboard IRRC).
2.4.27 is also still needed for the alpha installer.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
* Andres Salomon wrote:
> - there are 3 patches that were in 2.6.11 that have been dropped due to
> lack of interest; sparc, alpha, and powerpc folks should determine
> their value, at some point.
The dropped alpha patch is no longer required with 2.6.12, at least on
my systems the kernel work
severity 311357 grave
thanks
* Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module
> for the latest version of the 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel.
Sounds like a RC bug, so I'm setting it's severity to grave.
> I "upgraded" today from kernel-image-2.6.8.2-3
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If there are updates to unstable pending for any other
> > architectures, please let debian-release know.
>
> I'm currently compiling updates for alpha 2.4 and 2.6 kernels,
> upload tomorrow.
Uploaded, pleas
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
