USPEND_MODULES} ath9k"
Thanks.
---
Martín Ferrari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAL60Pd8_m72rzNzH8sEWrzrFzDNwestwwq7_5+Wfd3=ywu3...@mail.gmail.com
after testing this, I had a kernel freeze, for which I still
don't know the reason... (probably unrelated)
--
Martín Ferrari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archi
? If you can still reproduce
> it there can you send me your .config? Otherwise I expect my last
> round of changes to sysfs fixed whatever was the underlying problem.
I just download and compiled rc6, and all of these problems seem to be
solved. Thanks a lot!
--
Martín Ferrari
--
To UNSUB
Hi again,
First of all, I would like to know if anybody was able to fix this
problem that got kinda lost in the thread:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:05, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> I have just downloaded and compiled 2.6.32-2 and 2.6.34-rc5 from
> kernel.org using the .config from the
= -1) {
perror("unshare");
return 1;
}
system("ip link add name FOO type veth peer name BAR");
system("ip link set FOO netns 1");
system("ip link show");
return 0;
}
--
Martín Ferrari
t; [ 6696.035411] [] ? kthread+0x79/0x81
>> [ 6696.035414] [] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>> [ 6696.035416] [] ? kthread+0x0/0x81
>> [ 6696.035418] [] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
>> [ 6696.035419] ---[ end trace ef7b93cb006e989e ]---
> [...]
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
>
--
Martín Ferrari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/o2jb9800b71004210819t6ca61099y17be143527ccb...@mail.gmail.com
On 4/6/07, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 10:31:07PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> But I think that there is something different being discussed: pinging
> a local address in an inactive interface. Or I misread this bug, but I
> think the pro
On 4/6/07, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:31:51PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> I kept testing this one. And ifconfig does the same as ip addr del: it
> removes the address!
you mean "ifconfig eth0 0" down, or how do you remove the
#x27;t know if they stall in a queue or are discarded), ping
ignored, arp unanswered.
So, I don't know why you say that this doesn't work for ifconfig. I
now think that the bug should be closed for good.
--
Martín Ferrari
71817675
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
--
Martín Ferrari
UTS_RELEASE "2.6.11-1-386"
/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.11-1/include/linux/version.h:
#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.11-1"
In linux-image-2.6.12 this was not the case: the extraversion was not
present in UTS_RELEASE. I don't know if this was intentional, but
changing that value, solved all my module-compiling problems.
Regards, Martín.
--
Martín Ferrari
11 matches
Mail list logo
