On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 06:11:23PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> According to that bug report it should be fixed with 5.19-rc6 and that
> version
> is available in experimental. Can you verify whether it also fixes your issue?
With that version the error goes away.
This is probably https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216140
Kurt
I tried older kernels, 5.17.3-1 didn't show it.
Package: linux-image-5.18.0-2-amd64
Version: 5.18.5-1
Hi,
I'm currently seeing this during boot:
[5.632167] usb 1-14: New USB device found, idVendor=8087, idProduct=0aaa,
bcdDevice= 0.02
[5.632171] usb 1-14: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=0,
SerialNumber=0
[5.655513] ---
Source: crda
Version: 4.14+git20191112.9856751-1
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
Hi,
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
reglib.c: In function reglib_verify_db_signature:
reglib.c:1
This problem is still present in buster.
The relevant strace output seems to be:
capget({version=_LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3, pid=0}, NULL) = 0
capset({version=_LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION_3, pid=0}, {effective=0, permitted=0,
inheritable=0}) = 0
access("/var/lib/nfs/nfsdcltrack", W_OK) = -1 ENOENT
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 02:14:16AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> linux version 4.0.8-2 has been in the 'built' state on i386 for nearly
> 3 days. Please check and upload it.
It seems to have had various attempts to upload that failed in the
middle of the upload. It normally sorts itself out afte
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:14:32PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> Buildd admins: please can the amd64 build of perl 5.22.0~rc2-2 be
> given-back to see if it lands on a working host?
Given back.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:40:27PM +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2013/05/msg00065.html <===
> BTW, why is it archived on debian-68k?
Because it was send to debian-ports@lists and not
debian-ia64@lists like this, and debian-ports goes
to all the porter l
found 691576 3.2.46-1+deb7u1
thanks
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 03:35:33PM +0100, Stephan Schreiber wrote:
>
>
> The problem with GDB does no longer occur with Kernel 3.2.35-2. I
> don't have a clue why.
> A user has confimred that on the debian-i...@lists.debian.org list.
I'm seeing this on merulo
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 02:44:25PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> However, you are using r8169 here, not e1000.
I think the network driver itself is not related to the problem,
it's just that it wants RAM and can't get any.
> Any leads towards
> finding the resource hog, source of fragmentat
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:16:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> merge 495919 477377
> tags 477377 + moreinfo
> quit
>
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > You might also want to look at #477377
>
> Ok, merging optimistically. But we don't maintain the lenny ker
You might also want to look at #477377
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120709234606.ga29...@roeckx.be
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:40:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> >>> Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
> >>> Submit-A
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> severity 644198 wishlist
> found 644198 linux-2.6/3.2.10-1
> tags 644198 + moreinfo
> quit
>
> Hi,
>
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
> > Subm
Package: src:linux-2.6
Hi,
Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
instead of the current:
Submit-As: linux-2.6
That way the BTS will properly know this is a bug against a source
package and not a binary package.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-k
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 01:51:05AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Most of them were due to memory
> > issues that didn't show up with the x86memtester+ and for some
> > reason didn't show up with lenny. Still changing out the memory
> > fixed all my remaining issues, I can't be sure if this one
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:58:24AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 04:17:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [I also wonder why we are copying the unstripped modules into
> > /usr/lib/debug and not just debug info?
>
> Because the tools can't cope with them.
>
> >
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 02:01:02AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 7), cpio, module-init-tools, python, lzma
> [armel], libelf-dev, binutils-dev, asciidoc, xmlto
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 7), cpio, module-init-tools, python, lzma
> [armel], libelf-dev, binuti
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:13:58PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> tags 511393 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 04:57:25PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 03:58:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > Does this
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:45:08PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:02:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:01:14PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Source: linux-2.6
> > > Version: 2.6.26-21lenny3
> > >
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-21lenny3
Hi,
I'm seeing a regression test failure in elfutils because on some
of the buildds /proc/pid/maps is empty.
I have succesful logs and failed logs with "2.6.26-2-amd64",
as reported by uname. But they're obviously not running the
same version anymore.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 04:50:22PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 17:22 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that we have a 2.6.32 kernel in unstable, can you updates us
> > on the various things mentioned in this mail?
> >
> >
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 04:54:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It also ways:
> > Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: No
> > Auto-negotiation: on
> >
> > Those also seem to conflict and it really should advertise it.
> [...]
>
> No, "Auto-negotiation: on" does not mean au
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 05:27:33PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On the other hand, mii-tool reports this:
> # mii-tool -v
> eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok
> product info: Yukon 88E1011 rev 5
> basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
> basic status: autone
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-2
Hi,
I get this:
# ethtool eth0 |grep -i pause
Advertised pause frame use: No
Link partner advertised pause frame use: No
# ethtool -a eth0
Pause parameters for eth0:
Autonegotiate: on
RX: on
TX: on
Those seem to conflic
Hi,
Now that we have a 2.6.32 kernel in unstable, can you updates us
on the various things mentioned in this mail?
For instance, as I understand it, most other distro's recently
had a release with a 2.6.31 kernel? Do you know if there are
plans to have a kernel with backported drivers, one used
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 01:01:50AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:40:45PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.22-6
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found this message today:
> > rsync: page allocat
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 03:58:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> Does this still occur with more recent kernels?
The machine is still running a 2.6.26 kernel. I'll think about
upgrading the kernel.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.30-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Start Time: 20090707-2319
[...]
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 7), module-init-tools, python, gcc-4.3 [alpha
> amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sp
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:49:56PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > The released 2.6.30 seems to be fixing that issue too. Currently
> > don't see anything wrong.
>
> Of course it starts just after you send a mail.
So since version 2.6.29 I see random corruption
clone 523415 -1
reassign -1 linux-2.6 2.6.29
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reassign 485070 cryptsetup,linux-2.6
thanks
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 09:09:18AM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>
> I suggest reassigning this bug to the openssl library and/or kernel (and
> downgrading the severity, it's merely cosmetic). We can't do anything
> about it in cryptsetup.
I don't see h
Package: libc6-dev,linux-libc-dev
Severity: important
Hi,
When building dv4l I get the following error:
In file included from /usr/include/sys/time.h:31,
from /usr/include/linux/videodev2.h:59,
from /usr/include/linux/videodev.h:17,
from palettes
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-13
Hi,
I have seen this error on multiple systems, and always for the
device with swap on it:
mdadm[2860]: RebuildFinished event detected on md device /dev/md2, component
device mismatches found: 5632
This error is logged after the monthly "check" that is bein
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 06:20:46PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> Is the kernel issue of detecting your card with the proper driver resolved
> in the Lenny kernel? (Leaving the udev rename issue referenced later aside)
As far as I know, it was only the udev issue and never a kernel
issue fo
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 01:01:50AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > I found this message today:
> > rsync: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20
>
> Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions?
See #495919
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@li
Hi,
I've reported a very simular error message before: #477377
That was order 1 allocation failures.
Now I'm getting order 0 instead:
swapper: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-1-vserver-amd64 #1
Call Trace:
[] __alloc_pages_internal+0x3a6/0x
merge 497817 494374
thanks
It seems to the the insert key that causes my problems too. It
enables/disables the other keys.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-4
Hi,
Since 2.6.26-1 I sometimes don't have some of the special keys working
anymore, like pgup, pgdn, home, ins, arrow keys. But end and del keep
working.
I've seen them come back once, not sure why.
I didn't have this problem with 2.6.25.
They keep working
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 05:47:47PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> tags 393977 moreinfo
> stop
>
> hello Kurt,
>
> thanks for your report seem to have fallen through.
> sorry for coming that late, but could we have an update on a
> recent kernel aka >= 2.6.24
I don't have direct access to that
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:39:31AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.22-6
>
> old version no longer in testing please upgrade.
There is no vserver version available in testing an
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.22-6
Hi,
I found this message today:
rsync: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x20
Call Trace:
[] __alloc_pages+0x2a3/0x2bc
[] kmem_getpages+0x69/0x111
[] kmem_getpages+0x69/0x111
[] fallback_alloc+0x115/0x180
[] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x93/0xed
[] __a
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Version: 2.6.24-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-amd64'
scripts/Makefile.build:46: *** CFLAGS was changed in
"/build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 08:15:00AM +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:10:39PM +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
>>> confirmed or the doc is outdated, udev is not involved in issues,
>>> just clean up z25_persistent-net.rules, ma
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:10:39PM +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
> confirmed or the doc is outdated, udev is not involved in issues, just
> clean up z25_persistent-net.rules, managed mode with RSN EAP-PSK fine but
> master mode not selectable here with ucode5.fw:
My problem was actually related t
I'm having simular problems.
I've tried booting with parameters like:
video:intelfb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But it never seems to be loading the intelfb module.
When I modprobe it, I always get this:
intelfb: Framebuffer driver for Intel(R)
830M/845G/852GM/855GM/865G/915G/915GM/945G/945GM chipsets
in
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.24-1
Hi,
It seems that the kernel does not select the proper driver for me. When
booting a 2.6.22 (and .23) kernel, I see:
bcm43xx driver
PCI: Enabling device :02:00.0 ( -> 0002)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :02:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 10 (level,
low) ->
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:09:51PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > When building proftpd-dfsg on amd64 I get the following error:
> > In file included from /usr/include/asm/types.h:5,
> > from /u
Package: libc6-dev, linux-libc-dev
Severity: important
Hi,
When building proftpd-dfsg on amd64 I get the following error:
In file included from /usr/include/asm/types.h:5,
from /usr/include/asm-x86_64/sigcontext.h:4,
from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:5,
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Version: 2.6.22-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
/build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.22/debian/build/build_amd64_vserver_amd64_aufs/vfsub.h:
In function 'do_vfsub_symlink':
/build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 11:49:59AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 00:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> > Version: 6.6.3-2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just upgraded fr
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:07:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ok, since the proposal in its amended by Manoj form passed, we need to add an
> amendment to this proposal, accordying to Manoj, so that we don't have two
> proposals in effect at the same time, leaving it a full mess.
Whic
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:00:46PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:09:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that klcc is pointing CC to /usr/local/bin/gcc, but it seems
> > this is only the case on amd64.
>
> yes kno
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.16-2
Hi,
I'm getting the following error messages:
Losing some ticks... checking if CPU frequency changed.
warning: many lost ticks.
Your time source seems to be instable or some driver is hogging interupts
rip default_idle+0x2d/0x58
This is with a linux-image-2.
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 09:44 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Kurt,
> >
> > Could you please send the output of lsmod and lspci -v,
> > hopefully your hardware is reasonably common and i can
> > reproduce this problem. H
Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> Could you please send the output of lsmod and lspci -v,
> hopefully your hardware is reasonably common and i can
> reproduce this problem. However, a quick fix might be
> to try the 2.6.11 kernels in unstable.
lsmod:
Module Size U
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:17:47PM +0200, David Robin wrote:
> please note the message "XFree86: vm86 mode not supported on 64 bit
> kernel" at the end of the log. I have just noticed it. May this issue
> be related to XFree86?
I'm assuming that this is using the amd64 kernel with a i386
userland?
I intent to adopt the kernel-patch-usagi package.
I think I will atleast need to split it up in 2 packages, one for
2.4 and one for 2.6. So I'd get kernel-patch-usagi-2.4 and and
kernel-patch-usagi-2.6.
Or should I make a version for each kernel source package in
debian and then name them for in
59 matches
Mail list logo
