Bug#1070159: i915: CPU usage spikes with monitor powered down or unplugged

2024-08-10 Thread Gedalya
forwarded 1070159 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/11919 thanks

Bug#1070159: i915: CPU usage spikes with monitor powered down or unplugged

2024-08-10 Thread Gedalya
reopen 1070159 found 1070159 6.10.3-1 thanks Linux 6.10.3-1 shows the same behavior, no change

Bug#1071582: ip: Poor color choice for dark background

2024-05-22 Thread Gedalya
I'm trying ... https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2c0a1779713b5bdd443a8e8258c7d...@manjaro.org/ https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e1s9rpa-0006jy7-1...@ws2.gedalya.net/

Bug#1071582: ip: Poor color choice for dark background

2024-05-21 Thread Gedalya
On 5/21/24 10:55 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > This has always been enabled by default, even in stable. What is the meaning of this line in the changelog for 6.9.0-1, and why does it correlate with an actual change in behavior? Quote:   * Enable output with colors on terminals

Bug#1071582: ip: Poor color choice for dark background

2024-05-21 Thread Gedalya
Package: iproute2 Version: 6.9.0-1 Severity: minor Hello, The newly enabled colored output is rather hard to read on dark backgrounds, especially the deep blue color used for IPv6 addresses. Setting COLORFGBG=";0" as the manpage suggests helps a lot. Consider a scenario when this command is us

Bug#1070159: i915: CPU usage spikes with monitor powered down or unplugged

2024-05-20 Thread Gedalya
On 5/21/24 2:41 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Can you please test if you have the same behaviour with recent > upstream kernels? For instance test with 6.8.9-1 in unstable, or if > you can build upstream stable version 6.8.10, 6.9.1. 6.8.9 - same behavior 6.9.1 from pristine upstream tar show

Bug#992832: linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: please enable CONFIG_AMD_PMC

2021-08-24 Thread Gedalya
Package: linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64 Version: 5.10.46-4 Hi, amd-pmc is needed on recent AMD Ryzen laptops in order to properly enter s2Idle. Another module apparently relevant on recent Ryzen laptops is CONFIG_AMD_SFH_HID, although this PCI device is not present on my laptop. Thanks, Gedalya

Bug#984852: firmware-amd-graphics: Please add cezanne ("green sardine")

2021-03-09 Thread Gedalya
On 3/9/21 5:31 PM, maximilian attems wrote: > >> the display stopped updating as soon as amdgpu took over, and it never came >> back. >> The firmware is needed of course, and as a side note, it could be nice if >> the kernel could fail more gracefully, somehow bringing the display back (it >> wo

Bug#984852: firmware-amd-graphics: Please add cezanne ("green sardine")

2021-03-09 Thread Gedalya
Package: firmware-amd-graphics Version: 20210208-3 Hi, I've received my new laptop with a Ryzen R7 5800U and the display stopped updating as soon as amdgpu took over, and it never came back. The firmware is needed of course, and as a side note, it could be nice if the kernel could fail more gra

Bug#947413: linux-image-4.19.0-7-amd64: kernel lockup

2019-12-26 Thread Gedalya
Package: src:linux Version: 4.19.87-1 Dear Maintainer,    * What led up to the situation? Not sure exactly. Normal operations. I'll include some facts that I suspect might be relevant: Most volumes are mounted with the "discard" option. The I/O operations in question seem to have involved /v

Bug#930443: ixgbe: ixgbe_ipsec_tx: bad sa_idx=64512 handle=0

2019-10-15 Thread Gedalya
See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1846283 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c?h=v5.4-rc1&id=f39b683d35dfa93a58f1b400a8ec0ff81296b37c (linked therein) And: https://bugzilla.kernel.or

Bug#930443: ixgbe: ixgbe_ipsec_tx: bad sa_idx=64512 handle=0

2019-06-12 Thread Gedalya
't fully understand what's going on here, but I'd be happy to investigate further given some guidance. Also, if someone could provide some tips for a workaround that would be nice, since this is currently simply not working. Thanks, Gedalya ipsec statusall: Connections: offi

Bug#839627: linux-image-4.7.0-1-amd64: kvm-clock provides unadjusted time

2016-10-08 Thread Gedalya
I have two KVM servers where I'm doing GPU passthrough to a VM. Both are running linux 4.6.4. We're using an NVIDIA GPU which means I have to hide KVM (kvm=off, or ). As a result, current_clocksource is tsc. ntpd shows a drift of ~0. So in seems that the tsc values the VM is getting are adjusted.

Bug#839627: linux-image-4.7.0-1-amd64: kvm-clock provides unadjusted time

2016-10-06 Thread Gedalya
:126-13231 [002] 387476.246883: kvmclock_update_fn <-process_one_work kworker/0:47-13195 [000] 387476.246884: kvmclock_update_fn <-process_one_work Yet, the guests still seem to be getting the unadjusted time. Thanks, Gedalya

Bug#839627: linux-image-4.7.0-1-amd64: kvm-clock provides unadjusted time

2016-10-03 Thread Gedalya
Package: src:linux Version: 4.7.5-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, When booting the host with linux 3.16, it looks like kvm-clock provides guests with time as adjusted by ntpd. This looks like this (note the 'frequency' variable [0]): host : # ntpq -crv associd=0 status=0415 leap_none,

Bug#771045: System randomly freezes using Kernel 3.16 and radeon

2015-02-15 Thread Gedalya
On 02/16/2015 01:08 AM, Gedalya wrote: Fixes for this are included in Linux 3.19, commits: 3a01fd367e09ebf05d75a000407364e7ebe2b678 d474ea7e52cbaaae22711d857949ba6018562c29 cbfc35b90f3b4853d1eb9fcb82e99531d6a1c629 Ah, already in 3.16.7-ckt6 too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel

Bug#771045: System randomly freezes using Kernel 3.16 and radeon

2015-02-15 Thread Gedalya
Fixes for this are included in Linux 3.19, commits: 3a01fd367e09ebf05d75a000407364e7ebe2b678 d474ea7e52cbaaae22711d857949ba6018562c29 cbfc35b90f3b4853d1eb9fcb82e99531d6a1c629 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis

Bug#776050: Bug#776237: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: kernel panic on dom0 boot

2015-01-27 Thread Gedalya
On 01/27/2015 03:17 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Could #776237 be related to #776050? >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776050 > It's quite possible and the coincidence of the issue arising in ckt4 > makes me think it most likely is. > > Lets assume it is for now, I've merged th

Bug#776448: xen dom0: "xen:balloon: reserve_additional_memory: add_memory() failed: -17"

2015-01-27 Thread Gedalya
Package: src:linux Version: 3.16.7-ckt4-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, After a clean boot everything is OK, but as soon as I reboot a domU for the first time, I start getting these lines in dmesg: xen:balloon: reserve_additional_memory: add_memory() failed: -17 And they keep repeating fore

Bug#776050: Bug#776237: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: kernel panic on dom0 boot

2015-01-26 Thread Gedalya
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:41 + Ian Campbell wrote: > > This is actually a kernel issue I think, so reassigning accordingly. > > 2c3fc8d26dd0 "swiotlb-xen: pass dev_addr to swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single" > was backported to the stable kernel but this commit was reverted in > mainline via dbdd74763f1f

Bug#771045: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: System randomly freezes using Kernel 3.16 and radeon)

2015-01-23 Thread Gedalya
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:36:59 +0100 Antoine Amarilli wrote: > It seems like the bug was already reported in mesa: > The mesa package already has a fix for this staged in git for jessie, not released yet. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-xorg/lib/mesa.git/commit/?h=debian-jessie&id=6d8a4971d16

Bug#771045: Kernel crashes with radeonsi

2015-01-12 Thread Gedalya
I've been running now for 4d17h with locally built mesa 10.3.2-1 + upstream commit ae4536b4 applied. Kernel 3.16.7-ckt2-1. So far running without any problems. Without that patch I wouldn't last 24 hours. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Bug#767261: xen-netback changes in #767261 break Mini-OS netfront

2014-12-29 Thread Gedalya
;-) With your newly built kernel, everything seems to be fine. Cheers! Gedalya -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54a24b4a.1040...@gedalya.net

Bug#767261: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: host lockup when DomU network iface is down

2014-11-09 Thread Gedalya
On 11/09/2014 05:11 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 15:13 -0500, Gedalya wrote: On 11/08/2014 08:44 AM, Gedalya wrote: Tried to just frankenport xen-netback from 3.18 into 3.16, didn't work very well ;-) Did you backport just the above or the full set of changes from 3.1

Bug#767261: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#767261: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: host lockup when DomU network iface is down

2014-11-08 Thread Gedalya
On 11/08/2014 08:44 AM, Gedalya wrote: Tried to just frankenport xen-netback from 3.18 into 3.16, didn't work very well ;-) Did you backport just the above or the full set of changes from 3.18? I tried to "simplify" (avoid having to edit code myself..) by just copying the f

Bug#767261: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#767261: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: host lockup when DomU network iface is down

2014-11-08 Thread Gedalya
On 11/08/2014 05:39 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 00:40 -0500, Gedalya wrote: On 11/07/2014 03:25 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 11:06 -0500, Gedalya wrote: I suspect we will need to backport some xen-netback patch or other. I've put some feelers out to s

Bug#767261: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#767261: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: host lockup when DomU network iface is down

2014-11-07 Thread Gedalya
On 11/07/2014 03:25 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 11:06 -0500, Gedalya wrote: I suspect we will need to backport some xen-netback patch or other. I've put some feelers out to see if any of the upstream devs have any hints... OK so if it's just a matter of changing a

Bug#767261: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#767261: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64: host lockup when DomU network iface is down

2014-11-06 Thread Gedalya
On 11/06/2014 07:17 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: Control: reassign -1 src:linux Control: found -1 3.16.5-1 On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 12:57 -0400, Gedalya wrote: On dom0 I get messages like 'vif vif-10-0 vif10.0: draining TX queue', starting as soon as the domU's boot up. I'm p

Bug#675302: reassign to linux

2012-11-26 Thread Gedalya
reassign 675302 src:linux 3.2.32-1 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50b3654d.7070...@gedalya.net

Bug#681743: i915: display backlight brightness initially set to zero on boot

2012-10-14 Thread Gedalya
On 07/16/2012 07:45 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: If I don't get back to you soon, feel free to ping me. ping! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507afa52

Bug#675302: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-10-14 Thread Gedalya
What's up? Linux 3.2.30-1 (currently in sid) still has the same problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507afad7.6010...@gedalya.net

Bug#681743: i915: display backlight brightness initially set to zero on boot

2012-07-19 Thread Gedalya
Tested 3.5.0-rc7+, boots up the same way, with the backlight off. Adding i915.invert_brightness=1 makes it turn the brightness up to the maximum as expected, however this is pretty ugly. Without this parameter, I can just turn the brightness up with the fn keys and I get the nice on-screen indicato

Bug#680737: [wheezy] Intel i915: black display after boot

2012-07-15 Thread Gedalya
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 01:32 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Thanks for writing. Your hardware is sufficiently different from > Roland's that I really want this as a separate bug. We can merge them > later if they turn out to have the same cause. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6

Bug#680737: linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Intel i915: black display after boot

2012-07-15 Thread Gedalya
Package: src Version: 3.2.21-3 Followup-For: Bug #680737 I think this is the same problem here.. using an HP dm4t-1200 laptop. The backlight is set to zero brightness as soon as the kernel begins to load. In my case I can set the brightness higher by simply using the appropriate fn key combination

Bug#675302: [Bug 50571] nouveau crashes with GeForce GT 520

2012-06-16 Thread Gedalya
On 6/13/2012 9:43 PM, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: If you can find the fix by bisecting, that would make me very happy. I hope I got it all right, I tried to be very careful... $ git bisect bad 4cbb0f8d2b06c72aae3552ff1a0a57814c6ce7d2 is the first bad commit commit 4cbb0f8d2b06c72a

Bug#676866: linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: won't boot under xen

2012-06-09 Thread Gedalya
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.19-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? dist-upgrade, got linux 3.2.19-1 * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? reboot, since there's a new kernel. * What was the outcome of this

Bug#675302: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-06-01 Thread Gedalya
On 6/1/2012 2:47 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Ok, one more test and we should take this upstream: can you reproduce this with a 3.3.y or newer kernel from experimental? If so, please report this at, product Xorg, component Driver/nouveau (yes, that's where they track

Bug#675302: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-05-31 Thread Gedalya
On 6/1/2012 1:57 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Worrisome. Can you send a full kernel log from booting and doing this, including the boot-up sequence? Please send it as an attachment if possible so the log doesn't get corrupted in transit (e.g. by line wrapping). Saved the log from partedmagic to

Bug#675302: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-05-31 Thread Gedalya
On 5/31/2012 2:31 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hm. Might be possible to get a log with netconsole[1]. [1]http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt http://blog.mraw.org/2010/11/08/Debugging_using_netconsole/ Now tried running startx /usr/bin/xterm with nouveau, [ 82.42

Bug#675302: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-05-30 Thread Gedalya
On 5/31/2012 1:59 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi, Gedalya wrote: Tried removing the nvidia stuff and booting up with nouveau. [...] Total system hang as soon as xorg starts. No response from keyboard, mouse, no response on the network (no ping, no ARP response) [...] Using an Nvidia

Bug#675302: nouveau: hard lockup when gdm3 starts

2012-05-30 Thread Gedalya
On 5/31/2012 2:31 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Gedalya wrote: On 5/31/2012 1:59 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Does starting X with the nouveau driver work if you do not start a GNOME session? (You can test by running "startx xterm" if the xinit package is installed.) Interesting. Still

Bug#675302: linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: system totally hands when using nouveau

2012-05-30 Thread Gedalya
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.17-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Wanted to change back from the nonfree nvidia driver to nouveau. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Tried removing the nvidia stuff and

Bug#637234: linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen (also affects ext3 as of linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64 et al)

2012-03-04 Thread Gedalya
ou have to upgrade your dom0 to the latest kernel. I now have various wheezy domU's with barriers enabled again, running with no issues. Regards, Gedalya On 02/07/2012 05:17 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: package linux-2.6 notfound 637234 3.0.0-3 found 637234 3.1.0-1~experimental.1 fo

Bug#637234: [Xen-devel] Re: Bug#637234: linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen

2011-08-26 Thread Gedalya
One way to make sure that is not the case is to disable barriers in the guest. Meaning in /etc/fstab have something like this: /dev/xvdc /blah ext4errors=remount-ro,barrier=0 0 1 That seems to fix it. It was remounting as read only either during the boot process or immediately after,

Bug#637234: linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen

2011-08-25 Thread Gedalya
Gedalya, 2.6.39-2-686-pae could be anything from v2.6.39..v2.6.39.2 please could you confirm which package version you have installed in case it makes a difference. root@mail:~# uname -a Linux mail 2.6.39-2-686-pae #1 SMP Tue Jul 5 03:48:49 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux root@mail:~# dpkg -l

Bug#637234: linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen

2011-08-14 Thread Gedalya
This has already been reported here: http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com/msg05621.html Generally I use lvm2 as storage backend, but I've just reproduced the exact same behavior using raw image files. I get the following exactly every other time the VM boots: [6.8377

Bug#637234: linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen

2011-08-13 Thread Gedalya
Confirmed this happens under xen, not under native hardware or vmware. Reproduced on various xen hosts with both i686-pae and amd64 kernels in DomU. On a side note: DomU doesn't come back up on a restart, it seems like it's destroyed and not recreated. Seems like this too was introduced with

Bug#637234: linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen

2011-08-09 Thread Gedalya
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: important Hello, I have a xen host running debian squeeze, amd64, some of the DomU's are running wheezy. My mail server is a DomU called "mail", using ext4 for the root (and other) FS. A dist-upgrade on "mail" has upgraded the kernel to linux-image-3