Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686
Version: 2.6.18-8
Severity: normal
Inserting a CF pcmcia card, issues a series of 'lost interrupt'
messages. After removing and reinserting the card kernel freezes or
reboot spontaneously. An interesting information is that the it works
if the pcmcia card is alrea
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17388
This issue is also valid in debian AFAIK, please manage this controller
adding both modules to the initramfs image. Of course, a workaround
is adding the right module to /etc/mkinitramfs/modules by hand.
-
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:52:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Apparently, according to Francesco P. Lovergine , the latest version of
> hsflinmodem (5.03.27) was not free at all, it was a beta. Can anybody
> confirm this, since both 5.0327lnxbeta and 5.0327 versions exist...
AFAIK they are
I'm performing an ongoing activity to check the applicability of current
kernel-patches against sarge kernel-sources for 2.4.27 and 2.6.8.
An almost complete summary is available at
http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt
As you can see, there are a few patches which cannot
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:07:27PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, I recently upgraded my kernel to 2.6.10, and I no
> longer see this problem (screen blank after loading radeonfb with a
> Radeon 9600 -- original report mentioned 9200 SE). I never ran 2.6.9,
> so I can't say
Package: kernel
Followup-For: Bug #259042
The problem is evident using the same logitech usb keyboard
on usb port (with/out legacy mode enabled) or using an adapter
for ps/2 port. The problem disappears with a non-logitech ps/2 keyboard.
Of course the whole thing is true only in SMP mode.
-- Syst
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:44:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:44:32AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 09:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm having the same problem on a HP Pavilion zt3020EA, which has an ATI
> > > > Rade
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 02:42:10PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, I've been kept very busy with other things.
>
> Can you send me dmesg logs after enabling radeonfb verbose debug of
> the boot that leads to incorrect detection ? Also tell me what the
> real resolution
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 09:45:28AM -0500, Russ Woodman wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686
> Version: 2.6.8-3
>
> After installing this kernel deb, my Inspiron 8100 laptop will not fully
> boot. It is reproducible at all times, however the place in the boot
> sequence where the computer wi
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:37:05PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-14 22:20]:
> > Martin Michlmayr and Joshua Kwan worked on it.
> > Herbert Xu is still its upstream, so this issue should be
> > submitted to hi
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:14:55PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> PS: If initrd-tools is orphaned: I would be glad to adopt it.
>
Martin Michlmayr and Joshua Kwan worked on it.
Herbert Xu is still its upstream, so this issue should be
submitted to him.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:44:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:44:32AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 09:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm having the same problem on a HP Pavilion zt3020EA, which has an ATI
> > > > Rade
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 06:10:13PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> Anyway tnis is the 'missing pointer' for the issue on LKML:
>
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0401.2/1525.html
>
> And it seems simply missing in debian sources. So the fix by Christopher
> was different
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:48:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Benh, just so you are in the loop.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:45:07AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Package: kernel
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > 2.4 series radeonfb (1.8-benh) works perfe
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:46:50PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a while ago, I asked the kernel maintainer how to prevent modules from
> being loaded since now we have hotplug etc. that loads everything that
> sticks to the kernel.
>
Using hotplug or discover* blacklists?
--
Francesco
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:32:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I intent to adopt the kernel-patch-usagi package.
>
> I think I will atleast need to split it up in 2 packages, one for
> 2.4 and one for 2.6. So I'd get kernel-patch-usagi-2.4 and and
> kernel-patch-usagi-2.6.
>
> Or should I make a
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:21:23PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
>
> I was wondering why are we using initd on installed debian kernels.
>
That's needed in order to load on demand rootfs-related modules
(i.e. fs and block devices modules).
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:30:59PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:13:44PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 17:05]:
> > > There are some other kernel related packages that have t
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:13:44PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 17:05]:
> > There are some other kernel related packages that have to be taken
> > care of:
> >
> > cramfs
> > initrd-tools
> > kernel-image-*-alpha
> > kernel-image-*-i386
> > kernel-kbuild-*
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:09:40PM -0800, Scott A. Henderson wrote:
>
> I am not a expert at compiling kernels and don't do this to often so
> responses and questions should keep in mind I understand the basics.
>
Wrong list, please refer to debian-user.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:21:42AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
>
> I don't care much, not being particularly familiar with either arch or
> svn. If you ask me, it's cvs, but that has become unfashionable of late.
>
svn is cvs with steroids. It has the advantage of being quite smooth
in upgrad
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 01:12:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> I have no problem and creating the patches that fix these RC bugs. I also
> have no problem in uploading an NMU with my patches.
>
Could you point to a list of firmwares which need attention?
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:34:46AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Could we please adopt the [PATCH] tag in subject for submitting patch
> > suggestions as in LKML? It helps a lot in ML browsing...
>
> Is that going to be the canonical way to submit patches? I suggest
> changing the Maintainer of t
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 11:06:34PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Yes. Margit sent a patch for inclussion on 2.6.6 but it was just a huge
> > patch of our changes since our last release. netdev wants individual
>
Could we please adopt the [PATCH] tag in subject for submitting patch
suggestions as
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:44:43PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>
> I'm just looking at arch. It seems to be better than CVS - I never liked
> the version tracking since it was per file. :)
>
> Thanks for the suggestion - arch seems better than CVS.
>
Mmm, what's better among subversion and arch?
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 06:40:27AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> I would suggest using something that can handle multiple branches and
> makes version tracking between branches easy. It would be nice if we
> could add branches for seperate archs that can easily synchronise with
> the main
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:32:56AM -0400, Slaven Peles wrote:
>
> Er, what is LKML? Please let me know what information would be helpful. I'm
> kin of clueless here :-(
>
Linux Kernel Mailing List. Please, read http://www.tux.org/lkml/ before.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 06:52:49PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> We need to improve our kernel maintenance or it will be impossible to
> support the Linux kernel security-wise in the future. We = Security
> Team at the moment.
>
That's one of the reason the d-kernel list was born...
The kernel
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:30:03PM -0400, Slaven Peles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some people have reported that upgrade to 2.6.5 solved their sound problems,
> but in my case 2.6.5 "turned" sound off. I am running sid with debian
> precompiled kernel (2.6.5-1-686), I use alsa, and I have Intel's onboard
29 matches
Mail list logo
