Bug#623059: Data corruption when sendfile is used on atl1c Atheros NIC.

2011-04-26 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:58:12AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Your test program is broken; this function is missing a return > statement: [cut > It might be that the variable 'cfd' ends up in the return value anyway. > But you should fix this (and use compiler options -Wall and -Wextra). Thanks

Bug#623059: Data corruption when sendfile is used on atl1c Atheros NIC.

2011-04-16 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 01:09:51AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Try turning off TSO (ethtool -K eth0 tso off). Oops, I forgot to add to my report that I already tried it with following result: inst:~# ethtool -K eth0 tso off Cannot set device tcp segmentation offload settings: Operation not suppor

Bug#623059: Data corruption when sendfile is used on atl1c Atheros NIC.

2011-04-16 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-33 Severity: grave File: /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686-bigmem/kernel/drivers/net/atl1c/atl1c.ko Hello, As far as I can tell it there is the bug occuring when combination of sendfile(2) and module atl1c is used. The result of the bug is data corruption. Examples of da

Bug#576662: warning during scripts/local-top/cryptroot invocation: /scripts/functions No such file or directory

2010-04-06 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
1:1.15.3-1 Tiny utilities for small and embed initramfs-tools suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Artur R. Czechowski GCS/IT dpu-(++) s-:-- a C++ UL$ P+++ L++(+++) E--- W++ N+(-) K- w !O M- V? PE++ Y+ PGP++ t !5 X R tv--(-) b++ DI+++ D+ G e-(*) h++(---) r++ y+ -- To U

Bug#524911: Depends on unavailable package

2009-04-20 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Package: linux-image-amd64 Version: 2.6.26+17+lenny1 Severity: serious Hello, Latest linux-image-amd64 available in unstable is 2.6.26+17+lenny1. It depends on linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64 which is unavailable at the moment. Regards Artur -- no debconf information -- Po co mamy ze sobÄ… r

Re: Bug#294303: hotplug: Bad NET invocation: $INTERFACE is not set

2005-02-11 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: [cut] > > BTW, if you find it usefull, snippet of log with uncommented DEBUG in > > /etc/hotplug.d/default/default.hotplug follows: > Thanks, that is most

Re: Bug#294303: hotplug: Bad NET invocation: $INTERFACE is not set

2005-02-10 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:18:47AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > I did a bit of poking around, uncomented the DEBUG line (line 33) in > >

Re: Bug#294303: hotplug: Bad NET invocation: $INTERFACE is not set

2005-02-09 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:25:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Feb 09, "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've got following message when modprobing tun: > > &g