On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:46:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:19:29AM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
[cut]
> > BTW, if you find it usefull, snippet of log with uncommented DEBUG in
> > /etc/hotplug.d/default/default.hotplug follows:
> Thanks, that is most useful ineed.
> I am wondering if the reclassification made by
> /etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules is correct, given
> that the kenrel doesn't seem to think that the
> tun module (i.e. the tun module itself doesn't think)
> that tun is a net module.
Look at http://bugs.debian.org/129968, maybe it would give you a hint.
BTW, I placed 01tun.rules file with content:
KERNEL="tun", NAME="misc/%k", SYMLINK="net/%k"
and this annoying message does not appear anymore.
It looks for me that hotplug should have an exception for net/tun (but not
net/tun?*) class and serve it as a misc device instead net. Am I right?
Cheers
Artur
--
Co wolno Adminowi, to nie Użytkownikowi
/z pamiętnika administratora/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
