Package: src:linux
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Could you please enable CONFIG_IMA in the kernel? Ubuntu kernels have it
enabled, and I think they satisfied themselves regarding the performance impact
in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1244627
-- System Information:
Debian Releas
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The CONFIG_PROC_EVENTS option enables some cool functionality[1], could the
Debian kernel please have it enabled?
[1] http://www.outflux.net/blog/archives/2010/07/01/reporting-all-execs/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.5
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:58:39PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 07:02:57PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I attended a product briefing at Computer Associates on Thursday, and one of
> > the products that was discussed more than
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:58:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 07:02:57PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I attended a product briefing at Computer Associates on Thursday, and one of
> > the products that was discussed
Hi,
I attended a product briefing at Computer Associates on Thursday, and one of
the products that was discussed more than demonstrated was something called
eTrust Access Control[1], which, from my interpretation, sounds like it
achieves something similar to what SE Linux probably does. That's not
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:53:30AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> If the kernel team would really like to handle issues like detecting
> whether an i386 machine running a UP kernel is SMP, I'd be very happy
> for the code for that to move there. However, I don't think the 1:1
> subarch mapping you de
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:49:44AM +1000, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:12:48PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Package: kernel
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Could you please add the kernel-patch-mppe patch to the patches that are
> > made again
Package: kernel
Severity: wishlist
Could you please add the kernel-patch-mppe patch to the patches that are
made against the upstream kernel source for future Debian kernel-image
packages?
Thanks
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testin
Hi Sven,
You've orphaned kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 and kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8,
and I'm a bit confused by the text of #303024 and #303021
Who in your mind should be listed as the maintainer of these packages if not
either yourself or the Debian Kernel Team?
They've been orphaned for nearly
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:09:40PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> This is a bug in initrd-tools, which altough it knows how to detect the needed
> ide driver for your hardware, insists on loading all of them. I believe this
> should be solved before the sarge release.
>
> jbailey, could you commen
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:20:10PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> As a work around try defining the dummy
> symbols in your module's .c files somewhere. Here is what they used
> to look like.
>
> void cleanup_module(void)
> {
> }
>
> int init_module(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
No joy. Got an
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 09:04:42AM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I documented in my blog[1], I struck some problems building the latest
> ipw2200 module against the kernel headers provided with 2.6.10. I also
> couldn't rebuild older versions (that had successful
Hi,
As I documented in my blog[1], I struck some problems building the latest
ipw2200 module against the kernel headers provided with 2.6.10. I also
couldn't rebuild older versions (that had successfully built in the past).
Is this a problem with the kernel headers or with the ipw2200 module? (I'
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:51:28PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 01 d??cembre 2004 ?? 18:48 +0900, Horms a ??crit :
> > > Another example are the Realtek 8149 drivers. I had to blacklist one
> > > of the drivers. This chipset is really common. So many people will
> > > have to do t
Hi,
I've found it rather vexing that I've needed to run update-grub explicitly
after installing a new kernel on systems that I've recently installed.
Today, I finally looked into the matter.
So on a system that doesn't have an /etc/kernel-img.conf, the postinst of
the first kernel-image package
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 09:15:15AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686
> Version: 2.6.7-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi, I am running kernel-image-2.6.7-1-686 and using software suspend.
> Unfortunately, the 'swsusp' module is missing and /proc/acpi/sleep does
> nothin
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 08:19:07AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:59:10PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:45:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah, but what about 2.6 for powerpc and x86 (and maybe some ot
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:45:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Yeah, but what about 2.6 for powerpc and x86 (and maybe some other who
> is ready) and 2.4 for the rest of it (and 2.2 for some m68k subarches).
>
> I believe now is the time to take that decision, it may even be too late
> already,
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:54:23PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> I want to "open" a discussion about this bug on the debian-kernel
> mailing list:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253224
>
Ah yes. Herbert had quite strong views on what should and shouldn't be done
in the kernel, d
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 09:40:15AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:55:19PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:10:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > >> Sounds good. We should move to the 2.6.7 debs ASAP so this should keep
> > >> the t
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:06:11PM -0400, Robert Goley wrote:
> I am not trying to debate the firmware subject but I would like a little
> information. I know that there are issues with linking binary
> (non-free) with certain drivers. What is the exact procedure that will
> be used with these dr
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040610 09:40]:
> > Do we need to have three different RAID packages in sarge?
> >
> > >From the package description, it's only necessary for unpatched 2.2
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
