On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 08:19:07AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:59:10PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:45:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, but what about 2.6 for powerpc and x86 (and maybe some other who > > > is ready) and 2.4 for the rest of it (and 2.2 for some m68k subarches). > > > > > > I believe now is the time to take that decision, it may even be too late > > > already, given the sarge release schedule, and provided the GR doesn't > > > finish in some catastrophic result for the sarge release. > > > > Well, AIUI, d-i should be able to on a per-arch basis default to a 2.6 > > kernel. So we can have sarge release with a 2.6 kernel by default on > > selected architectures. -boot may correct me. > > Well, the important thing is not so much -boot, but compatbility with > the rest of userland, as well as upgrrades from woody with a 2.2 or 2.4 > kernel to sarge with a 2.6 kernel. > > For example, i know that the XF86Config-4 file needs to be changed when > using a ps2 mouse, since it was /dev/psaux previously, and is > /dev/input/mice now. Breaking X during the upgrade is hardly acceptable > if we are going to make 2.6 the default.
Hmm. dist-upgrading won't install a new kernel-image package, and a fresh install with 2.6 is going to get the mouse device right, so I don't think this particular example is a showstopper. Sure, if you've got a pre-existing install, with XFree86, and you choose to install a 2.6 kernel-image package, you're in for a bit of mouse pain... Andrew
