Source: linux
Version: 6.13~rc6-1~exp1
Severity: serious
building dkms modules for 6.13 in experimental fails with:
...
# LD [M] dm-writeboost.ko
x86_64-linux-gnu-ld -r -m elf_x86_64 -z noexecstack --no-warn-rwx-segments
--build-id=sha1 -T /usr/src/linux-headers-6.13-rc6-amd64/ -o dm-writebo
Followup-For: Bug #1087495
A typical dkms make.log looks like this:
DKMS make.log for dkms_test/1.0 for kernel 6.12-rc6-amd64 (x86_64)
Fri Nov 15 22:11:40 UTC 2024
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-6.12-rc6-amd64'
CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/dkms_test/1.0/build/dkms_test.o
MODPOST /v
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 9/26/24 23:29, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
This might be the same issue as the fixed one by
https://git.kernel.org/linus/0a6ad4d9e1690c7faa3a53f762c877e477093657
(cf. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205015)
Would you be able to apply this patch on top o
Source: linux
Version: 6.10.11-1
Severity: important
Control: found -1 6.11-1~exp1
Control: found -1 6.10.6-1~bpo12+1
Hi,
on my Lenovo Thinkpad T16 Gen 3, suspend does not work with recent
kernels. The laptop is running bookworm/amd64 with kernel (-amd64
flavor) and firmware from bookworm-backpor
On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 14:47:57 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Dylan_A=C3=AFssi?=
wrote:
As we now have a new version of firmware-nonfree
in deb/testing, is there a backport planned?
I'm willing to prepare the package if no one is against it.
I'm supporting this request. My new notebook needs an updated
firmw
Source: linux
Version: 5.10.209-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
is it possible to add support for header_preinst.h hooks (similar to
header_postinst.d hooks)?
My use case would be dkms. Whenever a linux-headers-$KVERS package gets
updated (without changing the package name), we need to rebuild all dkms
Source: linux
Version: 5.10.218-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
There are two commits in 6.8 that modify (the arch independent)
pfn_valid() in include/linux/mmzone.h to fix race conditions:
mm/sparsemem: fix race in accessing memory_section->usage
5ec8e8ea8b7783fab150cf86404fc38cb4db8800 (v6
Source: linux
Version: 6.6.3-1~exp1
Severity: normal
Since module compression was recently enabled, I'm wondering whether some
package (probably kbuild or headers) should add a dependency on xz-utils
to ensure the tools are available when building out-of-tree modules.
The missing xz was noticed i
On 03/10/2023 19.30, Bastian Blank wrote:
thread. Or freak out because meta packages remain uninstallable in
backports for days.
...
plus gcc or we change how backports works.
If uninstallable packages in backports are a problem, perhaps backports
needs something like britney to migrate pac
On 25/09/2023 00.50, Bastian Blank wrote:
Already built modules remain until someone deletes it. So you can also
switch back to the still installed older kernel version and it will have
the still working module available.
This is what I expect not to work.
Assume I have Linux 6.6 and a third-
On 24/09/2023 15.01, Bastian Blank wrote:
## Kernel modules will be signed with an ephemeral key
The modules will not longer be signed using the Secure Boot CA like the
EFI kernel image itself. Instead a key will be created during the build
and thrown away after.
Do I correctly assume that ch
Package: linux-kbuild-6.1
Version: 6.1.27-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
one change in dkms in bookworm is that it actually returns an error when
failing to build a module, as a result
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms may fail and cause
linux-headers
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 20230210-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m14.9s ERROR: WARN: Broken symlink
Package: firmware-intel-sound
Version: 20230310-1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
broken symlinks.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m13.1s ERROR: WARN: Broken s
Followup-For: Bug #1014633
What about adding a superficial autopkgtest that tries to compile a
dummy third-party kernel module using kbuild? That should help noticing
such breakage earlier.
Andreas
On 16/07/2022 17.05, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
If I understand correctly, all I need is the file
`NVIDIA-Linux-x86-340.108.run` which is distributed directly in
contrib in package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340xx-340.108.
I'll see if I can patch this package directly instead of duplicating
th
Source: linux
Version: 4.19.235-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
for autopkgtests that test building out-of-tree modules it would be
helpful to have an unversioned metapackage that depends on all kernel
header packages. If that is used as dependency of an autopkgtest,
the test itself can easily enumerate
On 11/07/2022 18.35, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Since the nvidia* package do the heavy lifting of downloading locally
binary, it would make sense to add yet-another package for firmware
related within the group.
Putting a downloader package in contrib under the Nvidia Team umbrella
is fine, but
Source: linux
Version: 5.16~rc3-1~exp1
Severity: important
Control: block 1001007 with -1
KBUILD_CFLAGS in 5.16 contains a quoted string, and at some point of
passing the flags through the build system of the kernel and third
party modules, the quotes get "protected" and finally passed as part of
Hi,
while you are at it, you could also add
Breaks: dahdi-dkms (<< 1:2.11.1.0.20170917~dfsg-7.0)
since dahdi-dkms had a similar problem (#982334) which got fixed for
bullseye.
Andreas
Package: linux-kbuild-5.10
Version: 5.10.28-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + sl-modem-dkms
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed sl-modem-dkms (buster) removes
include/generated/autoconf.h that was installed by linux-headers-5.10.0-
Package: firmware-qcom-soc
Version: 20210315-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m15.9s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlin
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 20210315-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m14.6s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symli
Source: linux
Version: 5.10~rc4-1~exp1
Severity: important
Hi,
building out-of-tree modules againt Linux 5.10 headers in experimental fails
with
No rule to make target 'scripts/module.lds', needed by
'/path/to/module.ko'. Stop.
e.g.
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'scripts/module.ld
Package: firmware-qcom-soc
Version: 20200421-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite
Source: dpkg,firmware-nonfree
Version: 20190717-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
Control: found -1 20190717-2
Control: found -1 1.20.3
Hi,
src:firmware-nonfree fails to unpack in sid with latest dpkg:
dpkg-source: info: extracting firmware-nonfree in firm
Package:
firefox-esr-dev,thunderbird-dev,lightning-l10n-bn-bd,lightning-l10n-pa-in,lightning-l10n-ta-lk,thunderbird-l10n-bn-bd,thunderbird-l10n-pa-in,thunderbird-l10n-ta-lk,linux-headers-4.9.0-8-amd64,linux-headers-4.9.0-8-rt-amd64,iceweasel-l10n-ak,iceweasel-l10n-csb,iceweasel-l10n-ku,iceweasel-l
Package: linux-perf-4.19
Version: 4.19.5-1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem
Source: linux
Version: 4.18.8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + linux-headers-4.18.0-1-amd64
Hi,
an upgrade test with piuparts revealed that your package installs files
over existing symlinks and possibly overwrites files owned by other
Package: linux-image-amd64-signed-template
Version: 4.18~rc4-1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#c
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:53:48 -0700 Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-08-23 at 20:14 -0700, Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
> > Let me re-state: worked with debian 3.9, broke with debian 3.11 (but
> > works with Ubuntu vanilla LTS 3.11.10.x series), worked with debian
> > 3.12,
Package: linux-image-4.11.0-1-amd64-dbg
Version: 4.11.6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + linux-image-amd64-dbg
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stretch-backports'.
It installed fine in 'stret
Followup-For: Bug #822671
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi Ben,
attached is a patch that improves the handling of initramfs.conf
That's a lot of code - but most of it was stolen from
dpkg-maintscript-helper :-) (preinst/postrm from rm_conffile, postinst
from from mv_conffile with slight modifications)
It
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.125
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package causes some trouble
with /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf upon upgrades from jessie:
1m18.3s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifi
Package: linux-perf-4.6
Version: 4.6~rc3-1~exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because
Source: linux-tools
Version: 4.4-4
Severity: important
Hi,
new major upstream releases (e.g. 4.4) of src:linux and src:linux-tools
should migrate together to testing. Right now src:linux-tools 4.4-4 is
already in testing, which doesn't look too useful to me without
src:linux 4.4.x-y.
Does any o
(this bug should probably be reassigned to fglrx-driver)
On 2016-02-22 07:26, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> P.S. My other registered bug #783449 still applies - I can't use backported
> fglrx with backported Linux 3.16 on Wheezy.
Does that conbination even build the kernel module?
Old drivers ususally d
Package: linux-perf-4.4
Version: 4.4-1~exp2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it t
Followup-For: Bug #810154
Control: found -1 0.121~rc2
Control: severity -1 serious
Right now the default configuration in experimental is broken:
* busybox is enabled by default
* missing busybox is a hard failure
* nothing depends on busybox
as noticed by piuparts:
[...]
Selecting previously
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.65-1
Severity: important
sorry for the brief report (and running the wrong kernel)
there seems to be a suspend2ram regression in 3.2.65-1, suspending
works, but resuming seems to reset inbetween and reboot regularily.
I'm now back to 3.2.63-2+deb7u2 which works fi
Hi Ben,
On Wednesday, 25. September 2013 06:42:06 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Further, any level of dependency (Depends, Recommends or Suggests) on
> > 'linux-image' prevents APT auto-removing any of the packages that
> > provide it, making any use of the virtual package actually harmful.
>
> I opene
On 2013-02-27 06:53, Antti Salmela wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:54:42PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 10:35 +0200, Antti Salmela wrote:
>>>>> ABI seems to have changed with the latest 3.2.39-1 kernel. Proprietary
>>>>>
On 2013-02-26 23:42, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'll see what I can do to fix this. (And unfortunately if the change is
reverted then you'll need to rebuild the module again.)
>>
>> Ben, Should I upload nvidia-graphics-modules rebuilt against 3.2.39-1?
>
> No, I believe I can fix this.
>
>
On 2013-02-26 14:44, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 13:24 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 10:35 +0200, Antti Salmela wrote:
>>> ABI seems to have changed with the latest 3.2.39-1 kernel. Proprietary
>>> nvidia driver (313.18-2) from experimental fails to load if
On 2012-08-06 19:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There is actually no attempt to check or maintain ABI stability for
> packages with the rt featureset (or openvz or vserver, in squeeze), as
> their stable updates have been comparatively less stable. This fact
> hasn't been advertised nearly as widely a
I'm afraid, this is getting a bit off-topic ...
On 2012-08-06 23:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I'm a bit confused why that is. If I'm installing a nvidia-graphics-driver
> package that does all the magic using dkms at install time, how is that more
> sophisticated than providing pre-built module packa
reassign 624297 linux-tools
reopen 624297
severity 624297 wishlist
thanks
that should not be forgotten, although the patch probably needs updating
for 3.X
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Hi,
I also suggest to add the build-linux-kbuild.sh script to the
documentation of the linux-kbuild- binary packages, that way it
should be easy to find for the people that need a current version of the
linux-kbuild- package to build modules for the latest kernel in
experimental.
Andreas
--
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
attached is a patch for the build-linux-kbuild.sh referenced from
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
It adds support for -rcX kernels by doing version mangling from -rcX to
~rcX as needed by Debian.
Also it
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: normal
File: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs
Hi,
update-initramfs considers linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 to be newer
than linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64 causing the initrd of an outdated kernel
to be updated.
Even though the 2.6.32-trunk kernels are no
maximilian attems wrote:
> well this is a regression fix, so not applyable to 2.6.32.
I didn't have any problems regarding fschmd with 2.6.32 (ABI -2 was the
latest version I tested).
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
According to the changelog of 2.6.33.1 there have been some off-by-one
errors fixed that may have caused this behaviour:
commit a5489ec13965fc30adbf309a066242e25be4424a
Author: Jean Delvare
Date: Fri Mar 5 22:17:26 2010 +0100
hwmon: Fix off-by-one kind values
commit dc71afe5ac7e8d049
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6
Severity: normal
Hi,
please build a new version of linux-kbuild-2.6 for 2.6.33 and upload it
to experimental to accompany the 2.6.33 kernel there. That way we can
build kernel modules for 2.6.33 and give the new kernel more testing.
Thanks.
Andreas
-- System Informat
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.2
Severity: normal
Hi,
something is broken with the fschmd module in 2.6.33, once the module is
loaded the machine reboots immediately. Also on the serial console there
is no output from the module except for (sometimes) a timestamp starting
a tru
Also checking a bit more reveals that the "quiet" option was removed
from the kopt settings. If there were more custom options - would they
survive?
-# kopt=root=/dev/sda1 ro quiet
+# kopt=root=UUID=bfc4d8de-5304-4285-adf0-1a5f7f57e765 ro
Also what would happen to static stanzas before/after the
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.33-1~experimental.1+r15282
Severity: normal
Hi,
the /dev/sdX to UUID= messes up /boot/grub/menu.lst:
* the file header (everthing before ### BEGIN AUTOMAGIC KERNELS LIST is
lost (timeout, color, default, ... are lost, would be more critical
with console on ser
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Hi,
please document in debian/README.build which packages are required to
be installed in order to perform the steps mentioned there.
Testing this in a clean minimal chroot with only build-essential and
subversion installed required me to install the following
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6
Severity: normal
Hi,
the linux-kbuild-2.6 package needs information on
a) how to generate a new orig tarball
(for me worked: debian/bin/genorig.py ../linux-2.6.31.tar.bz2)
b) how to rebuild the package if you checked it out from svn
An adjusted version of debian/REA
Package: linux-support-2.6.29-1
Version: 2.6.29-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
/usr/src/linux-support-*/modules/rules.include uses a wrong sed
expression to detect binary NMUs:
dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -ne 's,^Version: .*\+b\(.*\)$$,\1,p'
This incorrectly triggers on versions like
Package: firmware-qlogic
Version: 0.10
Severity: normal
Hi,
on ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/firmware/ there is updated and
new firmware available:
ql2400_fw.bin -- 4.04.00 IP (in firmware-qlogic: 4.00.27)
ql2500_fw.bin -- 4.04.00 (not yet in firmware-qlogic)
Andreas
-- System Info
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: normal
Hi,
after resuming from suspend-to-ram (suspended with s2ram from
uswsusp/unstable) mmc_core and sdhci spit out tons of errors and make the
system very unresponsive. Eventually the system freezes (or
unresponsiveness >>>
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7
Version: 2.6.16-12
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just experienced an oops while writing to a reiserfs partition.
The partition was newly created with current reiserfsprogs (1:3.6.19-2),
is about 64GB large and had a block size of 512 bytes.
The oops information from kern
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-k7
Version: 2.6.16-5
Severity: normal
After upgrading linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-k7 from 2.6.16-4 to 2.6.16-5
I had to rebuild the third party modules.
Errors reported when inserting the old modules were:
kernel: nvidia: disagrees about version of symbo
63 matches
Mail list logo
