Re: Bug#1076564: pahole BTF processing seems flaky on powerpc

2024-07-21 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Ben, On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 00:07 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I don't know what differences there are between these builders that > might be relevant. For kapitsa, the installed host system is powerpc while all the others run the ppc64 port. As for the hardware: kapitsa runs bare-metal (ins

Bug#1076517: marked as done (bugs.debian.org: Dmesg kworker kernel paging request Oops systemd uninterruptable sleep state D)

2024-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2024 19:52:21 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1076517: bugs.debian.org: Dmesg kworker kernel paging request Oops systemd uninterruptable sleep state D has caused the Debian Bug report #1076517, regarding bugs.debian.org: Dmesg kworker kernel paging r

Re: Bug#1076564: pahole BTF processing seems flaky on powerpc

2024-07-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:45 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:17 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I had a go yesterday and ran into the same problem. I couldn't > > reproduce with a small kernel config (allnoconfig + BPF + DEBUG_INFO + > > DEBUG_INFO_BTF) and there

Bug#1076561:

2024-07-21 Thread Michael Neilly
FWIW - I found that editing /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf and setting COMPRESS=lzma and COMPRESSLEVEL=9 was enough to get initrd to fit in my /boot. Using lzma instead of zstd for this particular release changed the size of the ram disk from 229,092,670 bytes to 86,150,862 bytes. Of course

Bug#1076646: marked as done (linux-image-6.9.8-amd64: Errors reported with initializing amdgpu that works with older kernel)

2024-07-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2024 21:51:14 +0200 with message-id <5058cabd-1e12-4b7e-a59d-8a23634fd...@hoeft-online.de> and subject line linux-image-6.9.8-amd64: Errors reported with initializing amdgpu that works with older kernel has caused the Debian Bug report #1076646, regarding linux-image

Re: Is the sh7785lcr kernel still useful?

2024-07-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] > > - Does anyone have it working with a recent (6.3 or later) Debian > > kernel package, and if so how? > > I am currently running a kernel built from git upstream, but I would love > to be able to boot a Debian kernel ag

Bug#1076582: initramfs-tools-core: mkinitramfs failure zstd -q -9 -T0 70 (No space left on device)

2024-07-21 Thread Simon John
I was hit by this the other day, I have a couple of systems built using Bullseye's suggested 500mb /boot for encrypted root. I now can't even fit 2 kernels. MODULES=dep makes almost no difference - 10mb smaller? I even tried reducing the ext4 reserved space from 5% to 0, which is far from ide

Bug#1057282: linux-image-6.5.0-0.deb12.1-arm64: arm64 kernel upgrade makes systems unresponsive

2024-07-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi all, On 14-07-2024 9:47 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote: For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves. The host has been running fine so far, I have installed the current unstable kernel on all arm64 hosts now. Paul