Bug#1003427: COMPRESS=zstd and COMPRESS=lz4 hard-coded to bad COMPRESSLEVELs

2022-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 11:04 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.140 > Severity: wishlist > > This is a vote for > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/52 > I did this investigation 2 months ago, but AFAICT I forgot to push it to >

Bug#1003427: COMPRESS=zstd and COMPRESS=lz4 hard-coded to bad COMPRESSLEVELs

2022-01-09 Thread Trent W. Buck
Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 11:04 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > Package: initramfs-tools > > Version: 0.140 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > This is a vote for > > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/52 > > I did this investigation 2 months ago,

Bug#1003427: Acknowledgement (COMPRESS=zstd and COMPRESS=lz4 hard-coded to bad COMPRESSLEVELs)

2022-01-09 Thread Trent W. Buck
PS: my previous email speculated: does zstd -T0 break SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH? I think this test shows that zstd -T0 is safe even when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1. i.e. it does not need the equivalent of mkinitramfs's workaround for xz and gzip. bash5$ ls -hl total 1.1G -rw-r--r-- 1 twb twb 1.1G 20

Bug#1003427: COMPRESS=zstd and COMPRESS=lz4 hard-coded to bad COMPRESSLEVELs

2022-01-09 Thread Trent W. Buck
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.140 Severity: wishlist This is a vote for https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/52 I did this investigation 2 months ago, but AFAICT I forgot to push it to bugs.debian.org. https://github.com/cyberitsolutions/bootstrap2020/blob/

Re: Getting the latest and greatest Linux perf features on every Debian kernel

2022-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 11:39 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:34:33PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu: > > Hi, > > > Debian currently tries to match the Linux perf tool to the version of > > the kernel that it is being run upon. Reaching out to Ben Hutchings, > > he e

Re: Getting the latest and greatest Linux perf features on every Debian kernel

2022-01-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2021-11-21 at 18:18 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > Hi, > > I'd love to package Linux perf as per Arnaldo's prepared tarball for > Debian. If I could get help on the Debian side it would be great! The > actions that are needed are: > > 1) package Arnaldo's tarball for Debian, presumably the bu

Bug#969264: Warning message still present in Bullseye 11.2

2022-01-09 Thread Frode Severin Hatlevik
I just updated my Debian amd64 system from Buster to Bullseye as per https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html I have to admit I cut some corners and enabled backports and Fast Track and did the update in one go. All went well, short of the error discussed i

Bug#1003210: Linux kernel module loading failing with "failed to validate module" error

2022-01-09 Thread Fabian Grünbichler
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:18:23AM +, Ben Dooks wrote: > Package: linux-image-5.15.0-2-amd64 > Version: 5.15.5-2 > > Dmesg output when mmc card is inserted: > > > [137854.880467] mmc0: cannot verify signal voltage switch > [137855.004774] mmc0: new ultra high speed SDR104 SDHC card at addres