Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 03:49:45 +0100
Source: linux-signed
Binary: kernel-image-4.7.0-1-amd64-di nic-modules-4.7.0-1-amd64-di
nic-wireless-modules-4.7.0-1-amd64-di nic-shared-modules-4.7.0-1-amd64-di
serial-modules-4.7.0-1-
Your message dated Wed, 07 Sep 2016 04:48:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#836255: fixed in linux-signed 2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #836255,
regarding DTBs are no longer bundled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
linux-signed_2.3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-signed_2.3.dsc
linux-signed_2.3.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Dear Vincent,
> Could you provide a bit more information about the package versions
> on your system?
> dpkg -l rpcbind nfs-common nfs-kernel-server systemd
psz@como:~$ dpkg -l rpcbind nfs-common nfs-kernel-server systemd
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpa
Hello Paul
I read your feedback on this issue with interest.
Could you provide a bit more information about the package versions
on your system?
dpkg -l rpcbind nfs-common nfs-kernel-server systemd
Also I think the output of these commands would be helpful
systemd-analyze critical-path remote-f
On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 21:43 +0200, José Agustín Terol Sanchis wrote:
> That totally makes sense!
>
> I supose that removing the meta-package is better than leave it there,
> since it could remain outdated or cause any kind of conflicts, right?
This is how it works:
- The 'linux-latest' source pa
That totally makes sense!
I supose that removing the meta-package is better than leave it there,
since it could remain outdated or cause any kind of conflicts, right?
Thank you again,
Agus Terol
2016-09-06 21:31 GMT+02:00 Uwe Kleine-König
:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:00:36PM +020
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:00:36PM +0200, José Agustín Terol Sanchis wrote:
> A few days ago, I saw that meta-package linux-image-rt-amd64 was available
> on sid. However, it is no more there. Also, I would say this is not the
> first time I have seen realtime kernal related packages appear
Hi,
A few days ago, I saw that meta-package linux-image-rt-amd64 was available
on sid. However, it is no more there. Also, I would say this is not the
first time I have seen realtime kernal related packages appear and disapper
on Debian sid (even in testing).
So, I am a bit confused about kernel
9 matches
Mail list logo
