Re: Updating Linux in wheezy

2013-06-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam D. Barratt (07/06/2013): > It's tight, but Saturday would be within the window we announced so > should okay from that perspective; it could be interesting if any > regressions appear. > > As wheezy's linux package also produces the kernel udebs, we should > really have the kernel included i

Bug#711474: linux-image-3.9-1-amd64: backlight brightness on Dell XPS13 is no longer changeable

2013-06-06 Thread Jan De Luyck
Package: src:linux Version: 3.9.4-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, After upgrading to 3.9, I can't reliably set the backlight on my Dell XPS13 anymore. using i915.backlight=vendor doesn't work either. Using the patch listed at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=97751, bug https://b

Re: Updating Linux in wheezy

2013-06-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 03:26 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I realise there's now just a week before the point release, which > doesn't leave much time for updating the installer even if I upload > right now (which I'm not about to). Sorry for letting this slide. > Supposing I can upload on Saturday

Bug#711470: ath9k_htc updated firmware for firmware-linux-free

2013-06-06 Thread Teg Skywalker
Package: firmware-linux-free Version: 3.2 The current firmware-linux-free package does not contain free firmware for the certain Atheros chipsets. Recently, the htc_7010.fw and htc_9721.fw firmwares were updated by Atheros and re-released under a free software license. This would invoke the rem

Updating Linux in wheezy

2013-06-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
There are a whole lot of fixes for Linux that ought to go into point release 7.1. Some of these are on the 3.2.y branch (over 400 commits between 3.2.41 and .46), a few have been added to our patch series and some are only in the BTS at present. I've rebased onto 3.2.46, but there are still vario

Bug#707286: initramfs-tools: [confirmed] initramfs-tools + linux-3.9.4 = no boot

2013-06-06 Thread Chris H
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.109.1 Followup-For: Bug #707286 Confirming this bug in wheezy with linux-3.9.4. My fix: --- /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local~ 2011-09-04 11:08:50.0 -0700 +++ /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local2013-06-06 16:21:08.707260079 -0700 @@

Bug#711450: debian-kernel-handbook: Possible typo in example on Chapter 6

2013-06-06 Thread Luís Picciochi Oliveira
Package: debian-kernel-handbook Version: 1.0.15 Severity: normal Hi, On Chapter 6 of the Kernel Handbook[1], there's an example for a possible content of /etc/modules: loop max_int=32 sbp2 I understand that "max_int" is supposed to be a parameter to the loop module, as explained in this Chapter.

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 06 June 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: > So yes, Allwinner has an evil vendor tree (c), with a solution similar yet > inferior (because not generic enough) to the device tree, but they show > interest on going down the mainline road. Right, and of course there is nothing special about that

Bug#711421: nfs-common: NFS4 mount with kerberos hangs forewer

2013-06-06 Thread Michal Kašpar
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.8-4 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, After last update that should solve 705507 the rpc.gssd no longer crashes, but mounting NFS share hangs forewer with syslog messages: NFS: Registering the id_resolver key type Key type id_resolver registered Key type id_lega

Bug#711410: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: System totally freezes and shows a Kernel Bug message corresponding to slab.c

2013-06-06 Thread Joao Duro
Package: src:linux Version: 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, 1) In the beginning of November I installed debian squeeze in the desktop, and the video cards given were not appropriate to my system. So I installed the kernel from squeeze-backports along with intel video packages

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2013-06-06 klockan 13:22 +0100 skrev luke.leighton: > idea: hook into devicetree gpio functions to allow script-fex gpio functions to gain access in a separate module? that sort of thing. No. Drop FEX from the kernel, use DT. There is no reason why the kernel shold care about the FEX format

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Henrik Nordström
tor 2013-06-06 klockan 13:19 +0100 skrev luke.leighton: > mass-volume tablet, mass-volume IPTV box. android OS, nothing else. Which still includes a number of possible configurations with different i2c, spi, usb etc devices connected on the board. Because Allwinner is not using mainline methods

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:28:10PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > I should also add that Allwinner not only talked to us already, but also > expressed interest in doing actual modern kernel development (like using > "recently" introduced kernel frameworks, like the clk framework). > > I've received

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi everyone, On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:00:00AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:13 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:54 PM, luke.leighton > > wrote: > >> augh. ok. solutions. what are the solutions here? > > > > Luke if you really want to fix

[bts-link] source package linux

2013-06-06 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #710430 (http://bugs.debian.org/710430) # Bug title: kernel fails to boot with Radeon 92

Processed: severity of 711342 is wishlist

2013-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 711342 wishlist Bug #711342 [src:linux] linux-image-3.10-rc4-amd64: does not include f2fs filesystem support Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 71134

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:13 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:54 PM, luke.leighton wrote: >> augh. ok. solutions. what are the solutions here? > > Luke if you really want to fix this a good solution is to have > Allwinner join Linaro and provide an engineer to the Linar

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 11:38:52PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > their sheer overwhelming success provides us with mass-volume > ultra-low cost hardware. to not make an effort to accommodate them > would in this specific instance be a huge missed opportunity, > responsibility for w

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread jonsm...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:54 PM, luke.leighton wrote: > augh. ok. solutions. what are the solutions here? Luke if you really want to fix this a good solution is to have Allwinner join Linaro and provide an engineer to the Linaro effort. That engineer will get educated on the right way to do ke

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:24:57PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> >> > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code to >> > DT (as it has been suggested in this t

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:24:57PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code to > > DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times already), as > > this is the only hardw

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:22:04PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Henrik Nordström > wrote: > > tor 2013-06-06 klockan 00:54 +0100 skrev luke.leighton: > > > >> > Not really the case. Actually the opposite. DT have this as well, and > >> > integrated in device probin

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:24:57PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code to > > DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times already), as > > this is the only hardw

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Tomasz Figa
On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:49:38 luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Luke, > > > > On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:24:57 luke.leighton wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa > > > > wrote: > >> > I don't see any other solution here

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Vladimir Pantelic
luke.leighton wrote: On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote: tor 2013-06-06 klockan 00:54 +0100 skrev luke.leighton: > Not really the case. Actually the opposite. DT have this as well, and > integrated in device probing. Allwinner need to hack every driver used > to add their

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread luke.leighton
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Luke, > > On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:24:57 luke.leighton wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa > wrote: >> > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code >> > to DT (as it has been suggested in this

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Tomasz Figa
Luke, On Thursday 06 of June 2013 13:24:57 luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code > > to DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times > > already), as this is the only hardw

Bug#711342: linux-image-3.10-rc4-amd64: does not include f2fs filesystem support

2013-06-06 Thread folkert
Package: src:linux Version: 3.10~rc4-1~exp1 Severity: normal Since kernel 3.8 a new 'f2fs' filesystem is included in the Linux kernel. The Debian image for 3.14-rc4 is missing this filesystem. Please include it: it is usefull for e.g. external SSD harddrives connected via USB which don't support

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread luke.leighton
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code to > DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times already), as > this is the only hardware description method supported by ARM Linux. i repeat again: please s

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread luke.leighton
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > tor 2013-06-06 klockan 00:54 +0100 skrev luke.leighton: > >> > Not really the case. Actually the opposite. DT have this as well, and >> > integrated in device probing. Allwinner need to hack every driver used >> > to add their gpio requests

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread luke.leighton
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > conditions. I don't know what you really mean here, only that it's not > "target market". mass-volume tablet, mass-volume IPTV box. android OS, nothing else. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a su

Bug#707257: linux-image-3.8-1-686-pae: KVM crashes with "entry failed, hardware error 0x80000021"

2013-06-06 Thread Stefan Pietsch
On 06.06.2013 13:40, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:35:13PM +0200, Stefan Pietsch wrote: >> I had no success with the Debian kernel 3.10~rc4-1~exp1 (3.10-rc4-686-pae). >> >> The machine hangs after "Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs". > OK, since it looks like it hang

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Stefan Monnier
> so the point is: if anyone wishes me to propose to allwinner that > they convert over to devicetree, or any other proposal which involves > significant low-level changes to their working practices that could > potentially have a massive knock-on effect onto their > multi-million-dollar clients,

Bug#707257: linux-image-3.8-1-686-pae: KVM crashes with "entry failed, hardware error 0x80000021"

2013-06-06 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:35:13PM +0200, Stefan Pietsch wrote: > On 06.06.2013 08:42, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:51:19PM +0200, Stefan Pietsch wrote: > >> On 05.06.2013 14:10, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:57:25PM +0200, Stefan Pietsch wrote: > O

Bug#707257: linux-image-3.8-1-686-pae: KVM crashes with "entry failed, hardware error 0x80000021"

2013-06-06 Thread Stefan Pietsch
On 06.06.2013 08:42, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:51:19PM +0200, Stefan Pietsch wrote: >> On 05.06.2013 14:10, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:57:25PM +0200, Stefan Pietsch wrote: On 19.05.2013 14:32, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 02:0

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Thomas, On Thursday 06 of June 2013 11:27:23 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Tomasz Figa, > > On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 02:01:14 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner > > code to DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times > > al

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:01:14AM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code to > DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times already), as > this is the only hardware description method supported by ARM Linux. Well, the serv

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hello, On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:48:27 -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote: > > fex covers *eevvveeerrthng* - right from flipping the > > multiplexing for all 3 SD/MMC cards so that you can pretend that SD0 > > is SD2 and you can specify *different* GPIOs for each to say which > > is > > Yo

Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Tomasz Figa, On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 02:01:14 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner > code to DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times > already), as this is the only hardware description method supported > by ARM Linux. H

Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

2013-06-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On Jun 6, 2013, at 12:07 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > [ please do try to remove debian-release from replies - my mistake > please try not to propagage it, even though it may be too late!] > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > eyy, allo russell

Bug#707257: linux-image-3.8-1-686-pae: KVM crashes with "entry failed, hardware error 0x80000021"

2013-06-06 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:42:40AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 02:51:19PM +0200, Stefan Pietsch wrote: > > On 05.06.2013 14:10, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:57:25PM +0200, Stefan Pietsch wrote: > > >> On 19.05.2013 14:32, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > >>>

Bug#711294: random lockups

2013-06-06 Thread Peter Palfrader
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-sparc64-smp Version: 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 Severity: important Hi, smetana.debian.org, running our wheezy 3.2 kernel, locks up regularly. It runs quite reliably using the squeeze kernel. When it locks up it still responds to pings but one cannot login. I saw this on the c