Hi John,
Salah Coronya wrote:
> As of kernel 3.7, [...] all the
> errors related to ths bug are gone for me - no distortion, no crashes,
> and no CACHE_ERROR, even after switching VT and running accelerated
> programs for over a week.
Can you confirm? A 3.7.1 kernel is available from experiment
Hi Pierre,
Pierre AUSSAGUEL wrote:
> I upgraded my laptop from sqeeze to wheezy.
> When using gnome the computer become sluggish after a few minutes. dmesg is
> full of : " [drm:i915_hangcheck_ring_idle] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed...
> render ring idle [waiting on 75118, at 75120], missed IR
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 697066 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-46
Bug #697066 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64] BUG: scheduling while atomic:
swapper/0/0x0800
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Ignoring request to alter found versi
reassign 697066 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-46
# letting version tracking do its work
tags 697066 - squeeze
quit
Hi Joachim,
Joachim Ott wrote:
> I opened the file adt-bundle-linux-x86_64.zip on /media/sda2 (ext3 fs) with
> "mc", then I tried to copy the contained directory to
> another disk /media/sdb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 665881 - moreinfo
Bug #665881 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: module ath5k is blocking
wlan-card
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
665881: http://bugs.debian.org/c
tags 665881 - moreinfo
quit
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> It patched fine, it loaded fine, but the bug did not disappear.
Excellent. I assume you applied all four patches. Thanks for
checking.
>> Hadn't you tested 3.3-rc6 and found it to work ok?
>
> No, I never did. Maybe I should.
I was referr
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch upstream
Bug #697077 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae: suspend to ram
doesnt work anymore with todays update (3.2.35-2~bpo60+1)
Added tag(s) upstream and patch.
--
697077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697077
Debian Bug
Control: tag -1 patch upstream
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 19:51 +0100, Jürgen Bausa wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 3.2.35-2~bpo60+1
> Severity: normal
>
> After todays update of package linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae to version
> 3.2.35-2~bpo60+1 suspend-to-ram
> doesnt work anymore on my
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:24:44 -0500 (EST), Gabriel Klawitter wrote:
>
> thank you for the efforts to solve the problem.
>
> Maybe I missed something, but isn't the case that is to be sorted out
> (for major/minors) the one that has a colon surrounded by digits (like
> [0-9]*:[0-9]*) and the case w
Hi Jonathan!
> Gah, that's way more work than should be required. Did the module
> eventually load and just not work well, or were the instructions in my
> message or in the kernel handbook broken? (The latter would be a very
> serious bug, more serious than any particular instance of missing hardw
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.35-2~bpo60+1
Severity: normal
After todays update of package linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae to version
3.2.35-2~bpo60+1 suspend-to-ram
doesnt work anymore on my system (Asus Vintage7-M4A3000E Barebone (Sockel AMD
AM3, SATA)). Previous version
worked fine (I th
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> After several tries and 5 hours of compiling, I am sad, to tell you, the
> patch, Ben sent me, is not working.
Gah, that's way more work than should be required. Did the module
eventually load and just not work well, or were the instructions in my
message or in the kernel
Hi Ben, hi Jonathan!
After several tries and 5 hours of compiling, I am sad, to tell you, the
patch, Ben sent me, is not working.
Just before you take work into a new patch, let me first try kernel-3.4, which
might be also possible to be released into next debian stable. Ben told so.
I tested
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 697066 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
Bug #697066 [kerneloops] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x0800
Bug reassigned from package 'kerneloops' to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64'.
No longer marked as found in versions kerneloops/0.12+
Hello,
thank you for the efforts to solve the problem.
Maybe I missed something, but isn't the case that is to be sorted out
(for major/minors) the one that has a colon surrounded by digits (like
[0-9]*:[0-9]*) and the case where the root string contains at most 4 hex
digits?
Why do not match
I installed kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64 and the problem does not show up, at
least after a few hours of testing. (I removed the semaphore=1 from the
grub line)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #608133 (http://bugs.debian.org/608133)
# Bug title: nouveau: NV4E acceleration corr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 697017 + patch
Bug #697017 [initramfs-tools] root=compute fails at parse_numeric() for lilo
compatibility
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
697017: http://bugs.debian.org/cg
Jonathan,
After further study of your patch, I did notice one flaw: the pattern
"*[!A-Fa-f0-9]*" will not match the null string, as your comments suggest
it will. And you have deleted the separate case which handles the null
string. Here is an improved patch:
http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxm
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:28:33 -0500 (EST), Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> How about this patch?
> ...
I like your patch better. It is more general and solves the more general
problem
of non-numeric strings being treated like numeric strings. Whenever I see
something which includes a bracketed expre
gnome might work better without the vga=780 bit in your cmdline.
It does not, independently on which of two kernels
- 3.2.0-4-amd64, version 3.2.35-2 (with boot_delay=100 to be able to boot with a higher probability)
- 3.6-trunk-amd64, version 3.6.9-1~experimental.1 (boots most often without a
22 matches
Mail list logo
