Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 661379 linux
Bug #661379 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Keyboard connected via
Logitech Unifying sender/receiver stops working during installation
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'linux'.
Ignoring request to alter
reassign 661379 linux
tags 661379 d-i
retitle 661379 Missing hid_logitech_dj module in D-I kernel
thanks
Quoting Matt Horan (m...@matthoran.com):
> I am seeing this behavior as well, and it makes installing Debian with
> my wireless keyboard and mouse impossible.
>
> The keyboard and mouse work f
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk):
> Maybe the linux-image packages should also warn in case 1, probably
> using a different message.
I have no specific advice about this but if that's the plan, pretty
please put me into the loop (as I guess this will be done through
debconf) so that I
Your message dated Sun, 5 Aug 2012 22:50:55 -0700
with message-id <20120806055055.GB27688@Jonathans-MacBook-Air.local>
and subject line Re: iproute: ip link can't remove bridge created with brctl
has caused the Debian Bug report #680094,
regarding iproute: ip link can't remove bridge created with b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # v3.5-rc5~17^2~3 (bridge: Assign rtnl_link_ops to bridge devices
> # created via ioctl (v2), 2012-06-26)
> fixed 680094 linux/3.5-1~experimental.1
Bug #680094 [src:linux] iproute: ip link can't remove bridge created with brctl
Marked as fixed in
Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Please attach a full log from netconsole from booting and
>> reproducing the problem. (It's ok if it doesn't say anything
>> interesting at the crucial moment.)
>
> Done.
Thanks for a quick reply.
One more test
copying my message to everyone else manually because gmail ate my CC.
Hi there,
Steps a. and c.: Neither 3.3.0-rc6 (from snapshots), nor 3.2.21, nor 3.2.20
reproduced the bug. I'm typing this email from 3.2.21 right now with a
fully functional wireless connection.
I skipped step b. due to not ha
On Aug 5, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 15:51 +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Please consider adding "[media] lirc_sir: make device registration
>> work" to stable:
>>
>>
>>
>> This probably needs to get acked by the subsystem maintainer.
>>
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 19:28 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 15:51 +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Please consider adding "[media] lirc_sir: make device registration
> >> work" to stable:
> >>
> >>
[Re-sending with the bug address cc'd.]
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 01:14 +0200, asronche...@libero.it wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Yes, i can try.
> I think a week could be enough (crashes happens in a day or two, on my
> notebook). I'll start with tomorrow morning (Monday).
>
> Do i need to uninstall all
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 17:50 -0500, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
[...]
> Yes, 3.2.19-1 still takes 12s. But as to problems
> disappearing/appearing I could have sworn that 3.2.21-3 took 12s. last
> night but now it takes 35s. I think the problem comes from the kernel,
> because that is the only thing tha
Hi Ben,
Yes, i can try.
I think a week could be enough (crashes happens in a day or two, on my
notebook). I'll start with tomorrow morning (Monday).
Do i need to uninstall all nvidia and bumblebee stuff and modules (modules:
bbswitch and nvidia) or will this procedure be enough?
1) disable b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 680762 + pending
Bug #680762 [src:linux] linux-image-3.4-trunk-amd64: lirc_sir isn't loadable
Bug #680768 [src:linux] SIR irda problems
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 15:51 +0200, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please consider adding "[media] lirc_sir: make device registration
> work" to stable:
>
>
>
> This probably needs to get acked by the subsystem maintainer.
>
>
Mauro, Jarod?
> commit 4b71ca6bce8fab3d08c61bf330e781f9
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-08-05 15:27:47 -0500, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Let me check some more Ben. I just checked 3.2.21-3 again and it took
> > 40secs. to hibernate. Should be 12secs. I'll let you know for sure.
>
> Have you tried to downgrade to 3.2.1
On 2012-08-05 15:27:47 -0500, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> Let me check some more Ben. I just checked 3.2.21-3 again and it took
> 40secs. to hibernate. Should be 12secs. I'll let you know for sure.
Have you tried to downgrade to 3.2.19-1 to see if it still takes 12s?
It seems that problems can stran
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 13:10 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> reassign 661069 base-installer 1.125
> quit
>
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 15:29:57 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> d-i team: can you reproduce this? Does installing on a machine with a
> >> radeon not warn a
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 12:11 -0500, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Slow hibernate occurs for the first time in 3.2.23-1.
>
> I really don't understand this, because I can't see any changes between
> 3.2.21-3 and 3.2.23-1 that could slow down disk
reassign 661069 base-installer 1.125
quit
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 15:29:57 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> d-i team: can you reproduce this? Does installing on a machine with a
>> radeon not warn about missing firmware? Is that fixable, for example
>> by using vesafb in
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 12:11 -0500, hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
> Slow hibernate occurs for the first time in 3.2.23-1.
I really don't understand this, because I can't see any changes between
3.2.21-3 and 3.2.23-1 that could slow down disk I/O for hibernation.
My suspicion is that this has something to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 683777 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43097
Bug #683777 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: some multimedia/action keys
don't work
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43097'.
> t
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 14:51 +0200, asronche...@libero.it wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
> thanks for the information.
>
> Sadly i think i cant reproduce this error. Error like these happens with
> random frequency.
>
> I also had a similar error while reading/copying a file from ramdisk.
>
> Yesterday
Well, not sure anymore now.
Everything seems to be working today.
I built the kernel.org 3.2.21 kernel, that seems to work fine, the
Debian 3.2.0-3 (3.2.21) kernel also seems to work fine.
I tried both cold reboot and warm reboot, none of them failed the
calibration.
From my 3.2.21 build:
d
Dear Maintainer,
seems like some Ubuntu users were also affected by this bug (on the same
notebook model) [1] and already reported it upstream [2].
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/974568
[2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43097
Cheers,
Stefan Nagy.
signatu
Hi Ben,
That would be great, considering that chance stands to have another
leapocalypse end of this month :)
Regards,
Vladimir
On Aug 5, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 11:48 +0200, Vladimir Lazarenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any progress on this one? It a
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 11:48 +0200, Vladimir Lazarenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any progress on this one? It appears that out there on the
> network there are quite a few stratum 1 NTP servers that didn't clear
> their leap second flag and one more was injected on quite a few
> machines end of Jul
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> A possible solution would be something like:
> 1. Keep multiple versions of udebs in the same suite (currently possible
> for arch:all, but maybe not supported for arch-dependent packages)
Breaks the expectations within d-i. This is
Slow hibernate occurs for the first time in 3.2.23-1.
None of the kernels previous to that one have the problem.
3.5-1~experimental.1 still has the problem.
Thanks!
Hugo
Hello,
thanks for your reply. Due to a lot of work "at work", I did not yet
manage to report the bug, but I will do so soon.
Today I want to add my current uptime and interrupt state for a last
time, as I might have to power down the system in a few days for
maintenance measures (and anyway
whoa, I'll see what I can do.
Building the 3.4.7 kernel was my first try at building the kernel, I
downloaded the bz2 file from kernel.org and followed the steps in
Telemachus' post (post #5) in the following thread:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=36525
I haven't used git befo
Sorry, i forgot to answer to this:
>Messaggio originale
>Da: jrnie...@gmail.com
>Data: 5-ago-2012 10.39
>A: "asronche...@libero.it"
>Cc: <683...@bugs.debian.org>
>Ogg: Re: Segfault while using mv/"fusermount -u" with sshfs share
>
>Yeah, that's not good. Thanks for reporting it. Am I co
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for the information.
Sadly i think i cant reproduce this error. Error like these happens with
random frequency.
I also had a similar error while reading/copying a file from ramdisk.
Yesterday i was checking an iso file with a torrent (i dumped the iso from a
dvd to ramdisk
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Please attach a full log from netconsole from booting and
> reproducing the problem. (It's ok if it doesn't say anything
> interesting at the crucial moment.)
Done.
> If you can get the corresponding Xorg log, that would be interesting,
Hi,
Is there any progress on this one? It appears that out there on the network
there are quite a few stratum 1 NTP servers that didn't clear their leap second
flag and one more was injected on quite a few machines end of July. I assume
the same might happen end of August as well :) Would be gr
Hi,
asronche...@libero.it wrote:
> I was moving a 2GB file from an sshfs share to my local pc (home
[...]
> So i tryed the 'sync' command and it stalled forever. So i rebooted
> the pc and after remounting the share the cp command went ok.
>
> When the problem began i was using openbox-session (v
tags 681232 + patch moreinfo
quit
Hi,
Russ Lind wrote:
> For what it's worth, the 3.5-1 kernel from experimental works for me
[...]
> I'd also built the 3.4.7 kernel from the sources at kernel.org.
[...]
> I've read about a number of people having this issue thru the 3.3
> kernels with various d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 681232 + patch moreinfo
Bug #681232 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: Atheros WiFi Adapter
couldn't find networks "gain calibration timeout"
Added tag(s) moreinfo and patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
37 matches
Mail list logo
