Hi Octavio,
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> The problem is a full system lock-up on resume. The HD led stays on.
> The 5-sec power-button cycle isn't enough to get the system back.
> It requires a full mechanical power cycle from the power supply.
>
> I bisected the problem as requested by Alan Stern, a
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:57:30 -0700, Jonathan Nieder
wrote:
commit 2feec47d4c5f80b05f1650f5a24865718978eea4
Author: Bob Moore
Date: Tue Feb 14 15:00:53 2012 +0800
ACPICA: ACPI 5: Support for new FADT SleepStatus, SleepControl
registers
[...]
Yes, okay, that is indeed totally separat
Hello,
2012/7/2 Ben Hutchings :
> linux is a big package and slow to build on some buildds. It looks like
> 'linux-2.6' was restricted to be built on the faster machines, and
> 'linux' should now be restricted in the same way.
JFYI, this issue has been dealt with. argento and arcadelt had 'linux
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 03:16:41AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> Please unblock package flash-kernel
>
> Hello,
>
> flash-kernel/3.1 adds device tree support for Dreamplug device (used by
> freedombox).
>
> Dreamplug support has been backported into linux/3.2.21-1, which we expect
> i
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:23:08 -0700, Alan Stern
wrote:
> Also, what does the "lspci -vv" output show for the controller if you
> run it with superuser permissions?
[Sat Jul 07 12:50:10 -0700 -- alvarezp@octavio:/sys/kernel/debug/usb]
$ sudo lspci -vv -s :00:0b.1
0b.1 is the EHCI control
Hi,
Quick administrivia.
Alan Stern wrote:
> Yes, that commit enables wakeup for USB host controllers by default.
> Before that, you had to enable wakeup by hand. The question is: Why
> does the controller think it needs to wake up the system?
Yotam Benshalom from https://bugzilla.kernel.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 677472 -1
Bug #677472 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: ohci_hcd module prevents
PC from suspending
Bug 677472 cloned as bug 680707
> notforwarded -1
Bug #680707 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: ohci_hcd module prevents
PC f
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> > If you build a kernel with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG enabled, what
> > shows up in /sys/kernel/debug/usb/ohci/*/registers?
>
> [Sat Jul 07 12:49:27 -0700 -- alvarezp@octavio:/sys/kernel/debug/usb]
> $ grep . ohci/*/registers
> bus pci, device :00:0b.0
> O
Rudy Zijlstra wrote:
> Still using it. Its my firewall. Sorry for missing the questions.
Yes, sorry about the clutter in my message.
[...]
> 1/ always behaved this way
> Not certain.
[...]
> 2/ how many times?
> at least twice. Its well possible that earlier cases were masked by
> reboots from
On 07-07-12 21:57, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Rudy, is this a regression, or has this system always behaved this
way? How many times has it happened? How reliable is the 1 month
gestation time? When did it start?
Ping. Do you still have access to this machine?
Still usin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 680669 initramfs-tools
Bug #680669 [plymouth] plymouth: abuse /var/tmp for initramfs creation
Bug reassigned from package 'plymouth' to 'initramfs-tools'.
No longer marked as found in versions plymouth/0.8.5.1-4.
Ignoring request to alter
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 677472 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43081
Bug #677472 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: ohci_hcd module prevents
PC from suspending
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # bisects to v3.2-rc1~183^2~113
> found 677472 linux-2.6/3.2~rc4-1~experimental.1
Bug #677472 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-2-686-pae: ohci_hcd module prevents
PC from suspending
Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2~rc4-1~experimental.1.
>
E
Hi, Alan!
So, after about more than a week of bisecting, and thanks to Jonathan
Nieder's
more-than-precise instructions, the results are in.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:41:31 -0700, Alan Stern
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:33:11 -0700, Alan Stern
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Rudy, is this a regression, or has this system always behaved this
> way? How many times has it happened? How reliable is the 1 month
> gestation time? When did it start?
Ping. Do you still have access to this machine?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-req
Hi,
Joshua Hudson wrote:
> For some reason a new apt-get dist-upgrade fixed bug. A new kernel
> package was pulled but the version did not change.
You can get the version of the kernel package with
dpkg-query -W linux-image-$(uname -r)
or
cat /proc/version
Perhaps the package
For some reason a new apt-get dist-upgrade fixed bug. A new kernel
package was pulled but the version did not change.
On 7/7/12, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Joshua wrote:
>
>> Version: 3.0.0-3
> [...]
>> I have some nonstandard console settings that require running
>> /etc/init.d/kbd to conf
Your message dated Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:19:18 +0200
with message-id <20120707171917.ga27...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680649: linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Restoring from
hibernate requires rerunning /etc/init.d/kbd start manually to fix broken
consoles
has caused the Debian Bu
Hi,
Joshua wrote:
> Version: 3.0.0-3
[...]
> I have some nonstandard console settings that require running
> /etc/init.d/kbd to configure console. Using the newer console-setup
> is a non-starter for reasons that are not relevant at this time.
>
> Somewhere in the last two months (it's hard to t
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I have some nonstandard console settings that require running /etc/init.d/kbd
to configure console.
Using the newer console-setup is a non-starter for reasons that are not
relevant at this time.
Somewhere in the last two
2012/7/6 Jonathan Nieder :
> I'll let Arend et al know, and maybe they will have ideas for future
> useful tests. In the meantime, let's brute-force this. :) How does
> 3.2.y + patches 1-17 do?
A quick follow-up... now running kernel 3.2.21 with the first 17
patches applied. Let's see how it go
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
mkvmlinuz_36_powerpc.deb: package says section is utils, override says devel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts,
Accepted:
mkvmlinuz_36.dsc
to main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_36.dsc
mkvmlinuz_36.tar.gz
to main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_36.tar.gz
mkvmlinuz_36_powerpc.deb
to main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_36_powerpc.deb
Changes:
mkvmlinuz (36) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer. (Closes: #677760)
* Rem
mkvmlinuz_36_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mkvmlinuz_36.dsc
mkvmlinuz_36.tar.gz
mkvmlinuz_36_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debi
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:47:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658443: fixed in mkvmlinuz 36
has caused the Debian Bug report #658443,
regarding mkvmlinuz: [INTL:id] Indonesian debconf templates translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:47:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#600132: fixed in mkvmlinuz 36
has caused the Debian Bug report #600132,
regarding [INTL:da] Danish translation of the debconf templates mkvmlinuz
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:47:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#549681: fixed in mkvmlinuz 36
has caused the Debian Bug report #549681,
regarding use xz to compress vmlinuz-boxed initrd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:47:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#509007: fixed in mkvmlinuz 36
has caused the Debian Bug report #509007,
regarding mkvmlinuz: force -fno-stack-protector
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6-s390x_3.2+45_s390.deb
to main/l/linux-latest/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_3.2+45_s390.deb
linux-headers-s390x_3.2+45_s390.deb
to main/l/linux-latest/linux-headers-s390x_3.2+45_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6-s390x-tape_3.2+45_s390.deb
to main/l/linux-latest/linux-image-2.6-
linux-latest_45_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6-s390x_3.2+45_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6-s390x_3.2+45_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6-s390x-tape_3.2+45_s390.deb
linux-image-s390x_3.2+45_s390.deb
linux-headers-s390x_3.2+45_s390.deb
linux-imag
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-45
Severity: normal
I sometimes get this kernel warning:
Jul 7 09:30:14 aste5 kernel: [21900.15] [ cut here
]
Jul 7 09:30:14 aste5 kernel: [21900.31] WARNING: at
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-45-i386-yQfQSv/linux-2.6-2.6.32/de
Cyril Brulebois (25/06/2012):
> - 1st d-i upload less than 12 hours from now.
> - udeb freeze.
Done.
> - 2nd upload when the kernel is ready, hopefully some time next week.
I have to review a few packages we might want to get into testing soon,
that should happen during this weekend.
As for
32 matches
Mail list logo
