Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: tails-...@boum.org
User: tails-...@boum.org
Usertags: testing
Hi!
Please build dummy_hcd and g_mass_storage modules.
The USB dummy HCD and Mass Storage Gadget would be very useful to
implement automated testing of Live systems such as Tails [0]
On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 16:18 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> The problems I've found so far (by inspection):
>
> 1. The daemon leaks a file handle on every configuration update.
Fixed by the attached 'tools-hv-fix-file-handle-leak.patch'
> 2. It doesn't check for write failures, and it doesn'
Accepted:
libusbip-dev_1.1.1+3.2.17-1_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-tools/libusbip-dev_1.1.1+3.2.17-1_i386.deb
linux-kbuild-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-tools/linux-kbuild-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb
linux-tools-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb
to main/l/linux-tools/linux-tools-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb
li
linux-tools_3.2.17-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-tools_3.2.17-1.dsc
linux-tools_3.2.17.orig.tar.gz
linux-tools_3.2.17-1.debian.tar.gz
linux-kbuild-3.2_3.2.17-1_i386.deb
libusbip-dev_1.1.1+3.2.17-1_i386.deb
usbip_1.1.1+3.2.17-1_i386.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 614170 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-30
Bug #614170 [usbip] usbip: attaching 2 identical devices requires delay
Bug reassigned from package 'usbip' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
No longer marked as found in versions usbip/0.1.7-3.
Ignoring request to alter
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 678636 normal
Bug #678636 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: dm-crypt partitions not further
working. No asking password to encrypt. System will not boot
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # regression
> severity 669314 important
Bug #669314 [src:linux-2.6] linux-source-3.2: After mounting nfs export, kernel
forces trailing slash for export in /proc/self/mounts
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping pr
Good afternoon! I discovered your primary photo.
I'm keen on you a lot.
Let us communicate!
I'm a girl and only serious about a male
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http:
Camaleón wrote:
> I'll keep testing brcmsmac with the upstream branch (mainline and
> unstable) so yes, if you have a kernel in your "radar" you think I
> could try just tell and I'll go with it.
Ok, cool. Here's my favorite kernel for the moment:
v3.2.21 + patches 1-10 from http://bugs.debi
El 2012-06-23 a las 12:23 -0500, Jonathan Nieder escribió:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > I noticed there was a new kernel update but as I was centered in this
> > bug report I had configured GRUB to directly boot the older kernel. I'm
> > going to leave the system for a while with the new kernel load
On 06/23/2012 12:30 PM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ben Hutchings wrote (23 Jun 2012 19:02:06 GMT) :
>> What is it that you think will happen at the freeze? We stop fixing
>> all bugs and do nothing for the next few months?
>
> Of course, and we'll lazily eat lots of icecream while you work hard
>
On 06/23/2012 11:53 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Johansen wrote (17 Jun 2012 19:08:20 GMT) :
>> On 06/15/2012 05:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't we need
>> to store the kern flag for later use by aa_revalidate_s
Hi,
I filed bugs for cryptsetup, lvm, mdadm and multipath-tools to support
this solution (i.e. provide scripts/local-block/ sniplets) [#678688
#678691 #678692 #678693].
If anyone wants to test this prior to those packages being fixed the
scriplets below can be used.
MfG
Goswin
==> scrip
Hi,
Ben Hutchings wrote (23 Jun 2012 19:02:06 GMT) :
> What is it that you think will happen at the freeze? We stop fixing
> all bugs and do nothing for the next few months?
Of course, and we'll lazily eat lots of icecream while you work hard
to release many shiny new Linux 3.2.x :)
Irony set as
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.106
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
the attached patch adds an event based loop for block devices to the
init script. New blockdevices are recorded in
/run/initramfs/block-events by an udev rule as they appear. The init
script repeadately waits for that and
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 20:53 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Johansen wrote (17 Jun 2012 19:08:20 GMT) :
> > On 06/15/2012 05:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>>
> > If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't we need
> > to store the kern flag for later use by
Hi John,
John Johansen wrote (17 Jun 2012 19:08:20 GMT) :
> On 06/15/2012 05:08 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>>
> If we don't want to restrict sockets used by the kernel, don't we need
> to store the kern flag for later use by aa_revalidate_sk()?
>
For how apparmor is generally deplo
Camaleón wrote:
> El 2012-06-23 a las 12:05 -0500, Jonathan Nieder escribió:
>> Camaleón wrote:
>>> the last (yesterday?) set of updates for
>>> wheezy have left the system in a very bad shape. Is not only that N-M
>>> is reconnecting very often (!) but gnome-shell and mail
El 2012-06-23 a las 12:05 -0500, Jonathan Nieder escribió:
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> > the last (yesterday?) set of updates for
> > wheezy have left the system in a very bad shape. Is not only that N-M
> > is reconnecting very often (!) but gnome-shell and mail-notification
Camaleón wrote:
> the last (yesterday?) set of updates for
> wheezy have left the system in a very bad shape. Is not only that N-M
> is reconnecting very often (!) but gnome-shell and mail-notification
> are segfaulting as crazy horses.
>
> I'm attaching the syslog.
This i
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 23:49 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > > On
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 23:49 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 15:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes H
Accepted:
linux-doc-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb
to main/l/linux/linux-doc-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb
linux-manual-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb
to main/l/linux/linux-manual-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb
linux-source-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb
to main/l/linux/linux-source-3.2_3.2.21-1_all.deb
linux-support-3.2.0-3_3.2.21-1_all
Hello,
I tried to use older initramfs-tools 0.103 by reinstalling them with
dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/initramfs-tools_0.103_all.deb
update-initramfs -k all -u
All installed kernee have still the same problem so I guess it could
comes not only from initramfs-tool.
Now I will reinstall older
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> -- /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md50 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdd1[3] sde1[5]
> 625137664 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
> bitmap: 1/3 pages [4KB], 65536K
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.106
> Severity: critical
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> After patching my system 3 days ago it will not further boot up. The initramfs
> prompt comes before the
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.106
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: breaks the whole system
After patching my system 3 days ago it will not further boot up. The initramfs
prompt comes before the keypass has to been normally asked for to decrypt my
root partition with the conta
27 matches
Mail list logo
