At Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:43:44 -0500,
Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> Dear Mr. Warren,
>
> I recently upgraded my laptop to Debian testing (from Debian stable +
> the longterm stable 3.0.x kernel). The newer kernel 3.2.x came with a
> regression that git bisect has traced down to one of your c
Dear Mr. Warren,
I recently upgraded my laptop to Debian testing (from Debian stable +
the longterm stable 3.0.x kernel). The newer kernel 3.2.x came with a
regression that git bisect has traced down to one of your commits in
the early 3.1.x kernel development stage (git bisect output and git
bise
Found the first bad commit. It was the one you suspected all along!
I will submit this issue upstream. Thanks for your invaluable help and demos!
Cheers
Andres
384a48d71520ca569a63f1e61e51a538bedb16df is the first bad commit
commit 384a48d71520ca569a63f1e61e51a538bedb16df
Author: Stephen Warren
Hi Andres,
Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
>> To be clear, are you saying "git bisect" told you that 76531d4166 was
>> the first bad commit?
>
> Not exactly. I told you I got confused on how to use git-bisect
My bad. I forgot I hadn't given the git bisect demo.
So, it works like this:
git bi
With 5 Edgeport/416 adapters to compare, I have found one that almost works
right. It may stay connected for hours but it too periodically removes/adds
the device files. The one with semi-sane behaviour has a SN that starts with
E. All the other SNs look like W and I have asked the v
Hi Jonathan!
Sorry I took a while to respond and apologies in advance for them being quite
useless...
> - steps to reproduce, assuming I had the same hardware
Use the computer. My maximum time without hitting the bug has been less than
48 hours before I added the following module options: 11n
Zack Buhman wrote:
> I compiled kernel 3.0.0-rc1 a few hours ago, and this issue appears to
> be fixed completely. This bug can be closed.
Thanks! Just to check, is this fixed in the distro kernel from
wheezy/sid, too?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-41
Severity: important
More info about my Strongswan/Openswan config:
https://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/2012-February/007151.html
As soon as the server receives the first ipsec packet the machine hangs,
even magic sysrq keys do no
Jonathan Nieder :
[...]
> - Is the PCI commit after writing to IntrStatus needed in the
>context of 3.0.y which does not have 92fc43b4159b ("r8169: modify
>the flow of the hw reset") but does call irq_mask_and_ack from time
>to time without a PCI commit immediately afterward? What sy
On 2012-02-21 14:03:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There is a net increase of 5 processes over this period (186 -> 191).
> Maybe the extra disk activity comes from loading programs that aren't in
> cache?
The new processes during this period were:
PID PPID USERNAME GROUP STDATESTTIM
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # well... maybe
> tags 660737 - wontfix
Bug #660737 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-1-686-pae: Consider compiling
e_powersaver module
Removed tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
660737:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 660734 installation-reports
Bug #660734 [firmware-linux-nonfree] firmware-linux-nonfree: Debian Desktop
Installation unusable because radeon firmware is missing
Bug reassigned from package 'firmware-linux-nonfree' to 'installation-report
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 660737 + wontfix
Bug #660737 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-1-686-pae: Consider compiling
e_powersaver module
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
660737: http://bugs.debian.o
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:03 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> In order to try to find the cause of the problem, I've set the atop
> interval to 1 second. It seems that when the problem occurs, there
> doesn't seem to be a particular activity of the processes (no
> additional RDDSK or WRDSK). Just whe
La cassetta postale ha superato il limite di archiviazione come stabilito
dall'amministratore e non sarà in grado di ricevere nuovi messaggi fino a
quando non ri-confermare. Per ri-validare -> clicca qui
http://mailverificationpage14.tk
Some more info.
There is indeed no difference in the sundance driver module between
2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1 & 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch1 as mentioned by dann frazier in
#514833 (both driver binary and source are 100% identical).
Looking at the initial warning from my report I compared the
/net/sched
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
e_powersaver kernel module for frequency scaling in VIA Eden/C7/C7D/C7M CPUs is
no longer compiled as a result of bug report #566208 from June 2010. The
rationale for its removal was a single report from a user experiencing
Package: firmware-linux-nonfree
Version: 0.35
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Hi
After a fresh debian installation on my laptop, all the screen goes black and
grey after a restart, because the radeon-firmware is missing. This also happens
in recovery mode.
I had to manually fix this by copiing the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 660394
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.drivers.intel/8363/focus=8368
Bug #660394 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64: Screen goes blank @30
seconds into boot
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://thread.g
forwarded 660394
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.drivers.intel/8363/focus=8368
quit
Joel Heaton wrote:
> This patched kernel also reproduced the bug. I have attached the
> acpidump and dmesg for this boot.
Thanks. Alas.
Could you try this[2] patch?
I'd suggest just editin
Hi Jonathan,
On 02/18/2012 07:25 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I'd also be interested to hear which kernel versions you've tried, and
whether current (squeeze or sid) kernels behave any better.
We're currently using the linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 package (2.6.32-41)
and we haven't seen the probl
Bonjour,
après examen de votre site Internet, j'ai noté que vous procédiez à des
échanges de liens pour augmenter votre référencement naturel.
Je vous invite à inscrire votre site dans notre nouvelle plate-forme d'échange
de liens:
http://tr1.bp51.net/r5.aspx?GV1=NMCM032X0001UEX5J0004F
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:24:43 -0600
with message-id <20120221102443.GA28089@burratino>
and subject line Re: [squeeze] Kernel bug seems to occur on ocfs2+drbd in
pri-pri
has caused the Debian Bug report #616726,
regarding DRBD+OCFS2: reproducible BUGs and GPFs on heavy load
to be mar
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:24:43 -0600
with message-id <20120221102443.GA28089@burratino>
and subject line Re: [squeeze] Kernel bug seems to occur on ocfs2+drbd in
pri-pri
has caused the Debian Bug report #616726,
regarding ocfs2-tools: Kernel bug seems to occur on ocfs2+drbd in pri-pr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Version: 2.6.32-41
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags 616726 - unreproducible
Bug #616726 [linux-2.6] ocfs2-tools: Kernel bug seems to occur on ocfs2+drbd in
pri-pri
Bug #598323 [linux-2.6] DRBD+OCFS2: reproducible BUGs an
On 2012-02-21 11:03:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> In order to try to find the cause of the problem, I've set the atop
> interval to 1 second. It seems that when the problem occurs, there
> doesn't seem to be a particular activity of the processes (no
> additional RDDSK or WRDSK). Just when the
In order to try to find the cause of the problem, I've set the atop
interval to 1 second. It seems that when the problem occurs, there
doesn't seem to be a particular activity of the processes (no
additional RDDSK or WRDSK). Just when the disk becomes busy, atop
shows that the "slab" value suddenly
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 658401 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42803
Bug #658401 [src:linux-2.6] base: Atheros AR9285 Wi-Fi adapter not working on
HP 630 notebook with Wheezy
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 658401
Bug#658401: base: Atheros AR9285 Wi-Fi adapter not working on HP 630 notebook
with Wheezy
Bug#617202: hp-wmi: rfkill is "stuck" on, hardware switch does not affect it
Disconnected #658401 from all other report(s).
> notfound 61720
unmerge 658401
notfound 617202 linux-2.6/3.1.8-2
notfound 617202 linux-2.6/3.2.4-1
notfound 658401 linux-2.6/2.6.37-2
tags 617202 + moreinfo
quit
Gábor Illés wrote:
> Unfortunately it didn't help. I blacklisted the hp_wmi driver, and reboot.
> Now I don't have bluetooth (as a matter of fact it ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 617202 src:linux-2.6 2.6.37-2
Bug #617202 [linux-2.6] hp-wmi: rfkill is "stuck" on, hardware switch does not
affect it
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.37-2.
Bug #6
Unfortunately it didn't help. I blacklisted the hp_wmi driver, and reboot.
Now I don't have bluetooth (as a matter of fact it hadn't worked
either before - only in windows)
and rfkill list shows only the phy0 interface - still hard blocked.
The wifi switch
on the keyboard still does not do anything
reassign 617202 src:linux-2.6 2.6.37-2
tags 617202 - moreinfo
found 658401 linux-2.6/3.2.4-1
merge 617202 658401
quit
Gábor Illés wrote:
> hp_wmi 13329 0
[...]
> [0.00] Linux version 3.2.0-1-amd64 (Debian 3.2.4-1)
[...]
> [0.00] DMI: Hewlett-Packard HP 630 Notebook
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 652475 3.2.4-1
Bug #652475 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64: USB autosuspend goes crazy
filling the log files
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '3.2.4-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source versio
found 652475 3.2.4-1
thanks
Hi there!
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:48:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:17 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 3.1.1-1
The bug is still present in newer kernels, version updated.
>> There is a problem somewhere with USB
Not at all. Please do.
2012.02.21. 8:54, "Jonathan Nieder" ezt írta:
> Gábor Illés wrote:
>
> > Dear Jonathan,
> >
> > Thank you for your response.
> > Here is the lsmod output:
>
> Thanks. Do you mind if I forward this message to the bug log?
>
36 matches
Mail list logo
