On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:52 +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote:
> tags 633526 + patch
> retitle 633526 NFS client uid/gid cache broken on VServer kernels
> thanks
>
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> > we now understand the problem, and it was fixed for
> > 3.0.4 with the following patch:
> >
> > http://vserver
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 633526 + pending
Bug #633526 [linux-2.6] NFS client uid/gid cache broken on VServer kernels
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
633526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 651914 2.6.32-38
Bug #651914 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Poor IPv6 performance from Xen guest;
GSO-related?
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-38' with
architec
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 05:23:23AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> What I'm noticing is the occasional incorrect checksum and "ICMPv6
> packet too big" messages seen above around 23:59:00.672905 and
> 23:59:01.240946 after a packet of length 2856. These do not occur
> on the server with the e1000e driv
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:16:28 +
with message-id <1323756988.2825.147.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Bug#651914: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Poor IPv6
performance from Xen guest; GSO-related?
has caused the Debian Bug report #651914,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-am
I just realised I still haven't replied to this. Sorry for the delay.
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 17:54 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 03/06/2011 07:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:41 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> On 03/06/2011 06:11 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> >> I'm willing to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 651622 + pending
Bug #651622 [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Sitecom WLA-2000 v1.001 WLAN stick not
supported
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
651622: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-38
Severity: important
Tags: ipv6
I have three squeeze servers running:
ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-38 Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit
PCs, Xen dom0 support
All three servers have Intel gigabit NICs, but one server uses the
e1000e driver and the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 644550 - moreinfo
Bug #644550 {Done: Jonathan Nieder } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: indefinite soft lockup on rm
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 14:47 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
> >> It seems this taint flag will be used for driers backported through
> >> compat-wireless, the compat
Today we generate a set of development packages for each architecture
from the linux-2.6 source package:
linux-headers--common
static headers
linux-headers--
configuration, symbol versions generated headers; depends on
linux-headers--common
linux-headers--all
metapa
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> > Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't n
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
>> > any good. We already consider sta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 637234 2.6.32-39
Bug #637234 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4
under xen (also affects ext3 as of linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64 et al)
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-39' with
found 637234 2.6.32-39
notfound 637234 3.0.0-1
thanks
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 08:35:47AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 22:02 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > This problem is also present with ext3 by default now, following the
> > barriers-by-default change in Linux 3.1 (
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 651891 src:nvidia-graphics-modules
Bug #651891 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae: Hanged
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'src:nvidia-graphics-modules'.
> retitle 651891 [nvidia] soft lockup in _nv014253rm
Bug #651891 [src
reassign 651891 src:nvidia-graphics-modules
retitle 651891 [nvidia] soft lockup in _nv014253rm
quit
Hi,
Grzegorz Andruszkiewicz wrote:
> Version: 3.1.1-1
[...]
> I was using KDE, 2 browsers, some other applications. At the time it actually
> hanged there was no-one sitting at the computer.
Than
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:27:57PM +0100, Thierry GRAUSS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a laptop computer with half of the RAM soldered on the motherboard.
> This soldered RAM has a huge amount of bad RAM (too many errors to be able
> to use the badram option).
>
> Fortunatly, there is a Linux kernel
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
> > any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
> > should also be true
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
> any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
> should also be true for out-of-tree modules which may receive very
> little review.
>
> Signed
I occasionally see the same on Thinkpad X220 too. You don't need to
shut down the machine in that case, pressing Ctrl-C is sufficient to
interrupt udev and continue to boot. And I see the same messages about
killing stuck modprobe, will confirm next time it happens.
Best regards,
--
Jurij Smak
A time limit for reproducibility, unless someone else affected by
the same bug arrives. Help tracking this bug down and getting it in
upstream hands would be welcome.
--- Begin Message ---
> Forwarding to the bug log.
...sorry, I wasn't sure about spamming the log. I'm not familiar with the
BTS-
I’m seeing this too on my ThinkPad X201i. The kernel I’m
running is linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae version 3.1.1-1.
It happens quite frequently, most often when first booting in the
morning; forcing a shutdown and trying booting again usually results
in a normal boot.
If there’s some debug output I
Camaleón wrote:
> El 2011-12-12 a las 12:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder escribió:
>> Even better would be to try booting without loading the radeon module,
>> by putting
>>
>> blacklist radeon
>>
>> in a file /etc/modprobe.d/oa-blacklist-radeon.conf and booting in
>> "recovery mode" so X does not
El 2011-12-12 a las 12:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder escribió:
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> > The user tried the latest kernel (3.2-rc4) with the firmware blob
> > package installed to enable 3D acceleration. Do you want he tries again
> > this kernel with no firmware package at all?
>
> Yes, that would
Camaleón wrote:
> The user tried the latest kernel (3.2-rc4) with the firmware blob
> package installed to enable 3D acceleration. Do you want he tries again
> this kernel with no firmware package at all?
Yes, that would help to figure out whether these new crashes are due
to the radeon driver
El 2011-12-12 a las 11:49 -0600, Jonathan Nieder escribió:
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> > The user has provided the following information:
> >
> > - The crash is still reproducible with Debian's stock kernel 3.1 with no
> > VirtualBox and wl modules loaded.
> >
> > - The crash is also happening with Deb
Forwarding to the bug log.
--- Begin Message ---
> Version: 3.2~rc4-1~experimental.1
>
> Egon Eckert wrote:
>
> > Actually, 3.2.0rc4 seems to run well! The big (and relevant) change since
> > the squeeze kernel is that the new has the intel_idle driver (which kicks in
> > instead of the acpi_idl
Camaleón wrote:
> The user has provided the following information:
>
> - The crash is still reproducible with Debian's stock kernel 3.1 with no
> VirtualBox and wl modules loaded.
>
> - The crash is also happening with Debian's experimental kernel
> (3.2-rc4). I'm attaching the full syslog and a
> [1]without bnx2 the precess fails, so It's not something that can be solved
by
> copying/edit some files, there is an interdependencies between firmware that
are
> not necessarily related, it can be a problem if you need to build-in
firmware-
> free and the process need a firmware non-free.
In data domenica 11 dicembre 2011 19:37:49, Jonathan Nieder ha scritto:
> Maybe it would be worth adding some rules from firmware/Makefile back.
It's a wish list so, Please :)
However, "brutal" solution:
/usr/src/linux-source-3.1$ mkdir firmware/
copy from vanilla source
/usr/src/linux-source-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 637234 + pending
Bug #637234 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4
under xen (also affects ext3 as of linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64 et al)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 22:02 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> retitle 637234 linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae: I/O errors using ext4 under xen
> (also affects ext3 as of linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64 et al)
> thanks
>
> [note that I've stripped off the CC to xen-devel in this comment, but
> have no objec
33 matches
Mail list logo
