Your message dated Fri, 26 Aug 2011 01:50:27 -0500
with message-id <20110826065027.gb11...@elie.gateway.2wire.net>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: MacBook Pro fails to boot with
"ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 -- -- ]"
has caused the Debian Bug report #590524,
regarding linux-im
I wrote:
> So possibly the Broadcom driver is the culprit here, though I could
> do a net install without problems.
What I meant is that the installer ran without apparent problems. I
still can't boot into the new system. I didn't mean to sound like I had
a successful installation - I don't.
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:28:19PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Matt Kraai wrote:
>
> > When I tried to boot my MacBook Pro, it prompted me for the passphrase
> > for my root partition. I entered this passphrase and the boot
> > continued. About 40 seconds into the boot, a blank line was
I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-3 to unstable on Friday or
Saturday.
This will include the fixes from stable release 3.0.3 and should fix the
FTBFS on mips & mipsel.
There should be no ABI bump.
Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 633738 + pending
Bug #633738 [linux-2.6] ip6_tunnel: kernel BUG at net_namespace.c:497
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #633738 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On 26/08/11 03:04, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Does the latest -pae or -amd64 kernel from sid produce the same
> symptoms? Are you able to get logs from right before the hang (for
Same issue on sid kernels linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64 (3.0.0-2) and
linux-image-3.0.0-1-686-pae (3.0.0-2).
I tried to get
Hi Rob,
Rob wrote:
> [60921.440540] btrfs allocation failed flags 2, wanted 4096
> [60921.440545] space_info has 4128768 free, is not full
> [60921.440548] space_info total=4194304, pinned=0, delalloc=0, may_use=0,
> used=0, root=0, super=65536, reserved=0
Hm, doesn't look like you're low on sp
Hi Michal,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> My clean 2.6.32.11 source disagrees with you:
>
> $ git checkout v2.6.32.11
> ...
> $ make ARCH=i386 defconfig
> ...
> $ grep CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN .config
> CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x100
> $ make ARCH=x86_64 defconfig
> ...
> $ grep CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN .conf
Hi David,
David Goodenough wrote:
> With kernels up to 2.6.26 this ancient machine did not require any
> special kernel boot options, but with 2.6.32 I need to add noapic to
> the kernel command in grub.
>
> If I do not add noapic the kernel gets as far as the pcmcia socket
> and gets through tha
Hi,
Volodymyr Shcherbyna wrote:
> After installation of debian 5.0.3 x64 the OS does not boot.
[...]
> I was able to isolate the issue. My system freezes and only "acpi=off" makes
> it possible to boot. My system configuration is:
>
> Asus P5QL Pro & Intel Core 2 Quad 2.5 Ghz
>
> I used latest st
Hi Joe!
Joe Neal wrote:
> When X starts the monitor immediately flashes that it is going into power
> saving mode, before a display manager has a chance to start. It wakes upon
> entering ctl-alt-F1 through ctl-alt-F6 but returns to power saving mode with
> control-alt-F7.
>
> Top, etc indic
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/636123#138
> http://bugs.debian.org/636123#159
> http://bugs.debian.org/636123#172
> http://bugs.debian.org/638896#16
> http://bugs.debian.org/638896#26
Ok. These aren't quite the smoking gun I was looking for, but they're
certainl
Hi Wojtek,
Wojtek Zabolotny wrote:
> When I try to use the "HR timer" as a MIDI sequencer timer in the
> Rosegarden (http://www.rosegardenmusic.com) application, the system
> freezes.
This is said to be fixed by bfe70783c (ALSA: take tu->qlock with irqs
disabled, 2010-04-28), which is part of v2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 607574 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #607574 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: wastes > 8s of boot time on
something USB related that fails
Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
tags 607574 + upstream fixed-upstream
quit
Hi Mario,
Mario wrote:
> [7.808651] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on
> minor 0
> [ 16.409864]
> /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-29-i386-Of6Yt1/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:
Hi Johan,
Johan Kroeckel wrote:
> When I activate intel-sata-powermgmt and plug/unplug ac things like
> this get appended to the syslog:
[...]
> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x5 action 0xe frozen
> ata1.00: irq_stat 0x0040, PHY RDY changed
> ata1: SError: { PHYRdyChg CommWa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 597209 keyboard LED indicators don't work
Bug #597209 [linux-2.6] base: keyboard doesn't work properly
Changed Bug title to 'keyboard LED indicators don't work' from 'base: keyboard
doesn't work properly'
> tags 597209 + moreinfo
Bug #597
retitle 597209 keyboard LED indicators don't work
tags 597209 + moreinfo
quit
Hi,
rush wrote:
> I've an error in dmesg:
> $ dmesg | grep -i keyboard
> [0.430054] atkbd.c: Failed to enable keyboard on isa0060/serio0
> [0.430174] input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as
> /devices/platform
Hi,
Matt Kraai wrote:
> When I tried to boot my MacBook Pro, it prompted me for the passphrase
> for my root partition. I entered this passphrase and the boot
> continued. About 40 seconds into the boot, a blank line was
> displayed, followed by a line containing a timestamp between 1 and 2
> a
Hi,
maximilian attems wrote:
> they used to be hardcoded loaded by initramfs.
>
> thought that powerpc plattform code had catched up and
> that udev would just load them.
Sorry for the long silence. It looks like after the fix to
Bug#603981, this is hardcoded again.
Meanwhile, upstream there w
Hi Thibault,
Thibault Manlay wrote:
> I have a problem occurring for some time now, my system hangs each
> time I close the lid of my laptop
[...]
> This problem was not present in the 2.6.32 version and appeared in
> the 2.6.38 version. I had not much time to determine at which
> version this pr
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:03 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl) reported bug
> > > #636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Ben Hutchings wrote:
> #
> # > Please try the kernel package from squeeze with the addition of the
> # > attached patches. (These patches fix different bugs which can also
> # > cause virtio_net to stop passing traffic. They are not applicable
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Hello,
I have a problem occurring for some time now, my system hangs each time I close
the lid of my laptop (Dell studio 1555) whether I'm on a tty or in a X session,
and the only solution is to restart
Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> as you can see from the attached dmesg log, I get page allocation
> failures in compiz with radeon/KMS.
>
> If I disable compiz/compositing, I don't see such messages in the kernel
> log. I get those messsages regularly although I don't have a specific
> way to
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Protzenko wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, I'm busy with other projects.
>
> Just ran a test against latest 2.6.32-5 from testing and xset dpms force
> off still doesn't work for the LVDS screen.
Sorry for the long silence. If you get a chance, you could test v3.1-rc3
or lat
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl) reported bug
> > #636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
>
> this guy is adding to much noise, so that various bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 630730 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/16744
Bug #630730 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32: GSO IPv6 issues
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/16744' from
'sta...@kerne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 630730 sta...@kernel.org
Bug #630730 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32: GSO IPv6 issues
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'sta...@kernel.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
630730: http://bu
forwarded 630730 sta...@kernel.org
thanks
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 04:48:58PM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> What's the status of this? Have the patches been forwarded to -longterm
> maintainers? (is that Greg KH?); if not, I'd be happy to do it for you.
After talking with Ben on IRC, I've prepa
Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Ok. So this test fails and according to the documentation the culprit
> should be a statically compiled driver. I guess I could then try to
> rebuild the kernel with more drivers as modules, but where to start?
Thanks! In modern times, initramfs-tools lets udev load some m
Hi Ben,
thanks for the quick reply!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 16:17 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 2.6.32-35
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Hello,
>> we've had several server-class machine (G6 and G7 HP Proliant blades)
Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> > Then
> > the machine halted or rebooted (depending on the mode) normally but I'm
> > not sure what was supposed to happen here. (I mean, I did not expect to
> > get back to the init shell I was on, since I left the grub cmd line
> > untouched upon restart...)
>
> It
Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Then
> the machine halted or rebooted (depending on the mode) normally but I'm
> not sure what was supposed to happen here. (I mean, I did not expect to
> get back to the init shell I was on, since I left the grub cmd line
> untouched upon restart...)
It was supposed to get
Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> Now that I look more closely, I suspect the dmesg you attached is from
> trying to resume after an unsuccessful hibernation. What would be
> most useful is to get as much information as possible somehow from the
> _unsuccessful_ hibernation, or even better, to trigger a
Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>> Does unloading ("modprobe -r") the e1000e driver before
>> hibernating help?
>
> No. It does not make any noticeable difference.
Stupid of me --- I was misreading the log. Thanks for checking.
Now that I look more closely, I suspect the dmesg
Here, I used a gparted LiveCD to replicate this bug on an extra set
of hardware we have. It appears to use a newer kernel but the bug
persists.
http://www.aaronopfer.com/637122.txt
Let me know if this is adequate information. It was enough of a hassle
to dig up the serial cables and null modem ch
Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> Does unloading ("modprobe -r") the e1000e driver before
> hibernating help?
No. It does not make any noticeable difference.
--
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:03:13PM +0100, monje314-2...@yahoo.es wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'm attempt to install Debian testing whezzy in a old Pentium III machine
> (VIA VT chipset)
This is not very specific; most VIA chipsets used to have model
numbers beginning with 'VT'.
What does the command
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 623514 linux-2.6/3.0.0-1
Bug #623514 [linux-2.6] pm-utils: fails to hibernate on Lenovo T500
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.0.0-1.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
623514: http://bu
found 623514 linux-2.6/3.0.0-1
quit
Denis Laxalde wrote:
> See attached. Let me know if you need more information.
Thanks. Does unloading ("modprobe -r") the e1000e driver before
hibernating help?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:42:00 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Does downgrading udev or the kernel help? /var/log/dpkg.log should
> describe the upgrade history of both, and http://snapshot.debian.org/
> has historical packages.
I'm fairly confident that this started happening after I started runn
Hi Jamie,
Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> So this problem is now happening with other udev functions as well:
>
> Aug 25 00:53:14 servo udevd[23014]: timeout: killing 'scsi_id --export
> --whitelisted --device=/dev/sr0' [23017]
>
> This leaves me not particularly convinced that this is not at lea
So this problem is now happening with other udev functions as well:
Aug 25 00:53:14 servo udevd[23014]: timeout: killing 'scsi_id --export
--whitelisted --device=/dev/sr0' [23017]
This leaves me not particularly convinced that this is not at least
partially a udev issue.
This issue has become q
Hi,
Since I have a hardware failure now and have not reported this bug
upstream yet, I would be glad, if you, Antony, could take care of
this.
For the same reason, I cannot say anything about ogg123.
Some time ago, I used HDA Analyzer [1] and could enable the external
speaker output by enabling
Hi again,
Frank McCormick wrote:
>I don't have either of those kernels now. And because I work at home I
> won't have the time to mess around with multiple boots for a while.
>
> Why are you interested? Are you having the same problem or what ?
No, I can't reproduce it myself. A few reasons
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #638312 (http://bugs.debian.org/638312)
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.c
Hi:
I'm attempt to install Debian testing whezzy in a old Pentium III machine (VIA
VT chipset)
The installation run smoothly, but at very first boot, the initrd phase don't
appear to detect the hard driver (IDE).
After find for a reason, i think that the kernels in the testing distribution
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:47:01AM +0200, Diggory Hardy wrote:
> Unfortunately I've still experienced this bug twice with the 3.0.0-1-amd64
> kernel, so the problem's still there.
>
> I presume it's a resume bug that needs to be filed against the e1000e module
> upstream?
fwiw, I haven't had this
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:44:07 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Real problem is identified
has caused the Debian Bug report #635912,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: High packet loss with RTL8169 using
Megabit LAN
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:44:07 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Real problem is identified
has caused the Debian Bug report #635912,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: High packet loss with RTL8169 using
Megabit LAN
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 25/08/11 22:11, Jiri Kanicky wrote:
On 25/08/11 02:23, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:43:14AM +1000, ganomi wrote:
Please get a name.
maverick:~# klist -ke /etc/krb5.keytab
Keytab name: WRFILE:/etc/krb5.keytab
KVNO Principal
--
On 25/08/11 02:23, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:43:14AM +1000, ganomi wrote:
Please get a name.
maverick:~# klist -ke /etc/krb5.keytab
Keytab name: WRFILE:/etc/krb5.keytab
KVNO Principal
--
4 nf
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:42 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:42:21AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > $ git svn dcommit 49b139e99bfec86618e67cf06900e648ea1c1ffe
> > Committing to
> > svn+ssh://ijc-gu...@svn.alioth.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/squeeze ...
> >
Sure, then I'll wait until a debian package is available. I'm on holiday
from this week end so it'll probably be at least a couple of weeks before I
get to that (since I don't see a 3.1 RC package available yet).
Cheers
Hi Ian,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:42:21AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> $ git svn dcommit 49b139e99bfec86618e67cf06900e648ea1c1ffe
> Committing to
> svn+ssh://ijc-gu...@svn.alioth.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/squeeze ...
> M linux-2.6/debian/patches/features/all/xen/pvops.patch
> Read-
Diggory Hardy wrote:
> Package version is:
> linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64 3.0.0-1
>
> Presumably this tells you what version of e1000e is used?
Yes, that's good enough. :) I was asking in order to tell if it was
3.0.0-1 or 3.0.0-2 (since both use the same linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64
package nam
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Nick Daly wrote:
> #
> # > This is an issue with the current release of Debian Squeeze. The
> # > issue is actually a boot-time load order issue. If the pcspkr module
> # > is inserted into the kernel too early in the boot process (as it is by
Hi,
Afaik, this is fixed with those commits:
[media] dib0700: correct error message for_v3.0
[media] dib0700: protect the dib0700 buffer access
[media] DiBcom: protect the I2C bufer access
from
http://git.linuxtv.org/pb/media_tree.git/shortlog/refs/heads/for_v3.0
A pull request has been sent t
Package version is:
linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64 3.0.0-1
Presumably this tells you what version of e1000e is used?
Thanks for the link, I'll have a look into reporting later.
Diggory
On 25 August 2011 10:51, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> reassign 635341 src:linux-2.6 2.6.39-2
> found 635341 linu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 635341 src:linux-2.6 2.6.39-2
Bug #635341 {Done: Jonathan Nieder }
[linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64] [linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64] eth0 unavailable
after standby until reload of e1000e
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64'
Bug
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing anything like this:
$ git svn dcommit 49b139e99bfec86618e67cf06900e648ea1c1ffe
Committing to
svn+ssh://ijc-gu...@svn.alioth.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/squeeze ...
M linux-2.6/debian/patches/features/all/xen/pvops.patch
Read-only file system: Can't open fi
Il giorno gio, 25/08/2011 alle 07.56 +0100, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
[...]
> > And yes, it is a 32bit debian squeeze system on a 64 bit Athlon cpu.
>
> But are you running the amd64 or 686 flavour of the hypervisor? Both are
> available in 32bit Debian. FWIW I would always recommend running the 64
Gedalya, 2.6.39-2-686-pae could be anything from v2.6.39..v2.6.39.2
please could you confirm which package version you have installed in
case it makes a difference.
root@mail:~# uname -a
Linux mail 2.6.39-2-686-pae #1 SMP Tue Jul 5 03:48:49 UTC 2011 i686
GNU/Linux
root@mail:~# dpkg -l | grep
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 08:52 +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 24/08/2011 alle 22.24 +0100, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
> [...]
> > Giuseppe, are you able to reproduce the issue you are seeing at will? If
> > I build a test kernel would you be able to try it? You are using a -686
> > kernel
65 matches
Mail list logo
