On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:15:39 +0200
Lars Maes wrote:
> I am also experiencing this issue with my XenServer 5.6 FP1 hosts when
> upgrading to the -33 kernel.
>
> Alas i can not give you any dumps, since I get no console from
> XenCenter and i do not know how to get this elsewhere.
I'm getting those
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
System boots, but many of my file systems are now btrfs and they do not
end up mounted. I'm now in Squeeze kernel to send this report. I
should be able to get the kernel traceback tomorrow.
Hey Jean,
> Had the same problem.
> Solved it removing nfs-common and portmap and reinstalling nfs-common.
> Then, portmap was not reinstalled but instead rpcbind was.
This worked out perfectly for me as well. Problem fixed, thanks.
Adnan
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Jean Baptiste FAVRE
wr
Miguel Figueiredo wrote
> " If I understood correctly:
> Using a Sil 3114 Sata raid controller
> you are only able to boot sucessfully in rescue mode. "
My appologies Miguel, I have not made myself clear. My fault.
In response to your question Miguel, my short answer is 'no'.
I cannot 'rescue - b
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Version 2.6.38-2 had build failures on a couple of architectures. We
> now have fixes for those, and a few other bugs. There is no pending
> stable update for 2.6.38, so I intend to upload this in about 24 hours'
> time if there are no obj
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 23:29 +0200, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote:
> Dear all,
Don't spam the BTS.
> I got an Inspiron 1120, and I am not even able to install anything of
> Debian from network because the driver brcm80211 (supposedly BCM4313)
> is not working. First I got the error "failed t
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2011 22:04:45 +0100
with message-id <1302469485.5282.343.camel@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#621737: linux-image-2.6.32-5-powerpc: ath ignores
regulatory domain setting
has caused the Debian Bug report #621737,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-powerpc: ath ignore
OK, cool, thanks, you can close the bug.
I agree - thankfully it is not a 5GHz part so no harm done from it
reporting CN.
Brgds,
On 04/10/11 20:08, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Sunday 10 April 2011, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 04/10/11 16:23, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
Hi
On Sunday 10 April 2011, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 04/10/11 16:23, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sunday 10 April 2011, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/10/11 00:55, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:39 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
[...]
> >> Ye
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 19:16 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 04/10/11 16:23, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sunday 10 April 2011, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/10/11 00:55, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:39 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >>>
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 20:09:36 schrieb Luk Claes:
> On 04/10/2011 06:10 PM, Rico Rommel wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 17:57:11 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> >> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
> >>> Package: nfs-common
> >>> Version: 1:1.2.2-4
> >>> Severity: normal
>
On 04/10/11 16:23, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Sunday 10 April 2011, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 04/10/11 00:55, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:39 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
[...]
ath driver ignores reg domain setting passed via cfg80211 and uses one
On 04/10/2011 06:10 PM, Rico Rommel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 17:57:11 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
>> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
>>> Package: nfs-common
>>> Version: 1:1.2.2-4
>>> Severity: normal
>>> Tags: ipv6
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Why ipv6?
>>
>> Ben.
>
> I noticed,
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Slavko wrote:
> Package: linux-base
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
> Version: 3.2
>
> sk.po attached
this confuses me there is already a sk.po in newer linux-base,
is this an update?
> regards
thank you.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-req
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 622146 - ipv6
Bug #622146 [nfs-common] nfs-common: compatibility between squeeze and sid
broken
Removed tag(s) ipv6.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
622146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:19:32PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:09:37PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Mi,
> > We were wondering if you could help us define the security impact (if
> > any) of your fix for nfsd4_op_flags, commit 5ece3ca upstream. If it
> > does have a
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:47:20 +0100
with message-id <1302450440.5282.124.camel@localhost>
and subject line Re: BCM4313: brcm80211 module needs to be blacklisted to
correctly suspend
has caused the Debian Bug report #615148,
regarding BCM4313: brcm80211 module needs to be blacklisted
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 620996 + moreinfo
Bug #620996 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-1-amd64: Kernel Oops During Resume
From Hibernate
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
620996: http://bugs.debia
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
> Package: nfs-common
> Version: 1:1.2.2-4
> Severity: normal
> Tags: ipv6
[...]
Why ipv6?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 15:32 +, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 04:45:39PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> > Ahoj,
> >
> > Dňa Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:36:47 +0100 Ben Hutchings
> > napísal:
> >
> > > I don't know what Max is talking about; there has never been an sk.po
> > > in linux-ba
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 20:24 +0200, Michael Ott wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.38-1
> Severity: normal
[...]
This may be the same bug as #620284, which was fixed in version
2.6.38-3. Please can you try that version?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to imp
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 18:36 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
[...]
> Dear kernel team,
>
> as discussed by some German users on the lists, I got the same problem after
> the last update.
Which version did you upgrade from?
> This is NOT a hardware problem, as my hardware is brandnew! Although mos
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 21:17 +0700, vietnq wrote:
> Package: udev
> Version: 166-1
> Severity: normal
>
> I have a Dell Inspiron 1464. When I plug a memory card into the internal
> card reader, a device node sdc1 is created.
Do you mean that this happened when running Debian 5.0 'lenny'?
> But af
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 08:16 -0400, Ken Yee wrote:
> FYI, bug still happens with the latest 2.6.38.-2 kernel, so it
> definitely doesn't seem kernel related:
[...]
Try using a *Debian* (not aptosid) kernel without VirtualBox.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improv
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:09:37PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Mi,
> We were wondering if you could help us define the security impact (if
> any) of your fix for nfsd4_op_flags, commit 5ece3ca upstream. If it
> does have a security impact, we can work with MITRE to get a CVE ID
> assigned.
Apolo
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 17:57:11 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
> > Package: nfs-common
> > Version: 1:1.2.2-4
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: ipv6
>
> [...]
>
> Why ipv6?
>
> Ben.
I noticed, that nfs-common doesn't depend on librpcsecgss3 anym
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 04:45:39PM +0200, Slavko wrote:
> Ahoj,
>
> Dňa Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:36:47 +0100 Ben Hutchings
> napísal:
>
> > I don't know what Max is talking about; there has never been an sk.po
> > in linux-base or linux-2.6 (which linux-base was split from).
there is in the squeeze
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6
After installing nfs-common 1:1.2.3-2 on clients (unstable) the nfs-kernel-
server in squeeze denies access for kerberized nfs exports.
syslog on the server (squeeze) gives:
rpc.svcgssd[1049]: ERROR: prepare_krb5_rfc_cfx_buffer:
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:36:47 +0100 Ben Hutchings
napísal:
> I don't know what Max is talking about; there has never been an sk.po
> in linux-base or linux-2.6 (which linux-base was split from).
no problem ;-)
anybody sometime make a mistake...
--
Slavko
http://slavino.sk
signature.
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:36:47 +0100 Ben Hutchings
napísal:
> I don't know what Max is talking about; there has never been an sk.po
> in linux-base or linux-2.6 (which linux-base was split from).
perhaps he is talking about this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608684
-
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 14:18 +0200, Slavko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dňa Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:01:49 +0200 maximilian attems
> napísal:
>
> > this confuses me there is already a sk.po in newer linux-base,
> > is this an update?
>
> and this confused me :-)
>
> the linux-base source package in sid (3.2) do
Hi
On Sunday 10 April 2011, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 04/10/11 00:55, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:39 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
[...]
> >> ath driver ignores reg domain setting passed via cfg80211 and uses one
> >> from EEPROM instead. This setting a lot of cheap cards is CN.
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 07:31 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 04/10/11 00:55, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 13:39 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >
> >> Package: linux-2.6
> >> Version: 2.6.32-30
> >> Severity: minor
> >>
> >>
> >> ath driver ignores reg domain setting passed via cf
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 02:33 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Package: nfs-common
> Version: 1:1.2.3-1
> Severity: important
>
> % head -n1 =start-statd
> #!/bin/sh -p
> % /bin/sh -p -c true
> /bin/sh: Illegal option -p
> % ls -l =sh
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 17. Dez 18:49 /bin/sh -> dash
>
> The opti
Please cc all bug mail to the bug address (620...@bugs.debian.org). Use
'reply to all'.
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 11:05 +0200, Alexander Abt wrote:
> hello,
>
> I wait, could you reproduce the error?
No.
> Or find something?
I didn't see anything odd.
> Do you have recived the output of lspci in
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 15:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 14:15 +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > On 01.04.2011 14:04, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > There isn't an official spec. However the source and unit tests for the
> > > DebianLinux Perl module (add
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 622118 + pending
Bug #622118 [linux-base] linux-base: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 14:15 +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> On 01.04.2011 14:04, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > There isn't an official spec. However the source and unit tests for the
> > DebianLinux Perl module (added to linux-base to support this command)
> > explain the rules I
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 01:49:12PM +0200, Ernesto Cuconato wrote:
> [ 2906.788016] [Hardware Error]: Instruction Cache Error: Parity error
> during data load.
> [ 2906.788019] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L1, tx: INSN, mem-tx: IRD
> [ 3187.948018] [Hardware Error]: MC0_STATUS[-|CE|-|-|AddrV|CECC]
Hi,
Dňa Sun, 10 Apr 2011 14:01:49 +0200 maximilian attems
napísal:
> this confuses me there is already a sk.po in newer linux-base,
> is this an update?
and this confused me :-)
the linux-base source package in sid (3.2) do not contain debconf's
sk.po file and here is not bug filled (nor archi
I don't think so beacuse I bought it last year and I've never seen
errors like this in kernel 2.6.32-amd64.
Ernesto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.o
On 01.04.2011 14:04, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> There isn't an official spec. However the source and unit tests for the
> DebianLinux Perl module (added to linux-base to support this command)
> explain the rules I came up with.
I don't feel that this is enough. I wanted something that we could agree
o
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 03:24:35 +
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> You need to install rpcbind and the above version of nfs-common.
Thanks,
Done that, but the problem still exists. It is not so critical, hence I use
sshfs as a backup solution.
ii nfs-common
Package: linux-base
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Version: 3.2
sk.po attached
regards
--
Slavko
http://slavino.sk
# Slovak translations for linux-base package
# Slovenské preklady pre balÃk linux-base.
# Copyright (C) 2011 THE linux-base'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed und
Hi,
evdev is loaded and doesn't matter.
I've set up several KVM systems without manual modifications, all the same.
The problem is still present with 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64.
Regards,
--
.''`. Philipp Huebner
: :' : pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225 3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F
`. `'` HP: http:/
Hi,
I have the same problem with nfs-common that is mentioned in several bug
reports (#622085, #621918, #562737, #621027). I don't know how much they are
connected or which one is the real issue, but the system is definitely unusable
since it cannot boot up normally. It hangs on the message "St
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 07:46:33PM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> At least on my case I was blacklisting quite a few kernel modules on my
> guest of things I didn't want supported to save some memory, in the end it
> resulted that one of the modules (evdev I believe, I'll check it out for
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2011 09:43:15 +0200
with message-id <4da15f93.9010...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: nfs-common: nfs mount inpossible
has caused the Debian Bug report #622085,
regarding nfs-common: nfs mount inpossible
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
48 matches
Mail list logo
