Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 555835 + pending
Bug #555835 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.30-2-686: Unusual usb storage Samsung
YP-CP3 not working
Bug #555836 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.30-2-686:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 21:31 -0400, Brian Michalski wrote:
[...]
> So I went back into XOrg.conf to look through and try to see
> if perhaps the system was misconfigured.
>
> This is what I saw:
> ---
> Section "Device"
> Identifier"Configured Video Device"
>
firmware-linux-free_2.6.37-1~experimental.1_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.37-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.37.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-support-2.6.37-trunk_2.6.37-1~experimental.1_all.deb
linux-patch-deb
Good Morning,
I've been working on this bug for the last 3 days and think I've
isolated and corrected the problem. Intel provides special (open source)
linux drivers for their video cards at this url:
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/index.html
After looking over the site for awhile and attempt
These are the patches that looked security-relevant, from a fairly quick
review:
[03/49] fuse: verify ioctl retries
Kernel buffer overflow, but only CUSE servers could exploit it and
/dev/cuse is normally restricted to root.
[16/49] IB/uverbs: Handle large number of entries in poll CQ
Fixes integ
linux-2.6_2.6.37.orig.tar.gz has incorrect size; deleting it
Due to the errors above, the .changes file couldn't be processed.
Please fix the problems for the upload to happen.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ke
2.6.36-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings
commit 551423748a4eba55f2eb0fc250d757986471f187 upstream.
The error message 'NMI watchdog failed to create perf event...'
does not make it clear that this is a fatal error for
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives wi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 609046 moreinfo
Bug #609046 [linux-image-2.6-686] linux-image-2.6-686: pata_via module boot
fail with vt6415
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping proce
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:40:58AM +0900, Aki wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.32-5
> Severity: important
>
> pata_via module and ATAPI device cause panic with VIA vt6415 PATA IDE
> Host Controller.
Then send the panic message.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit o
Hello distinguished bug owner, :)
Is there a replacement bug I can subscribe too regarding the
below? If I can help kill this squeeze bug I'm willing. Not
everybody has this old hardware.
Thanks,
Mark Lila
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 05:31 -0700, "Mark Lila"
wrote:
Hello,
I have an old Toshiba Sat
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: important
pata_via module and ATAPI device cause panic with VIA vt6415 PATA IDE
Host Controller.
I tried boot from ATAPI CD drive with squeeze beta2 iso image. but
normal boot fail.
Then put boot command "libata.dma=1" or "nolapic", success
Hi,
Am 05.01.2011 17:22, schrieb Ian Campbell:
> I'd strongly recommend upgrading to something newer, such as the drivers
> supplied with the XCP 1.0 beta. The beta designation does not apply to
> the Windows driver component of this release, they are a GA version of
> the drivers.
>
> http://ww
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 608144 + pending
Bug #608144 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Kernel oops:
net/core/dev.c:1582 skb_gso_segment+0x109/0x263() (Bug #596802 reappeared)
Add
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 16:29 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 05.01.2011 14:57, schrieb Ian Campbell:
>
> > Per my previous mail please can you let me know the details of the
> > Windows driver versions you are using, where you got them from etc.
>
> PV drivers are Citrix WHQL serve
Hi,
Am 05.01.2011 14:57, schrieb Ian Campbell:
> Per my previous mail please can you let me know the details of the
> Windows driver versions you are using, where you got them from etc.
PV drivers are Citrix WHQL server for XenServer 5.5, don't know download
source anymore (looked for it in xen-
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Am 05.01.2011 14:11, schrieb Ian Campbell:
>
> > Netback is supposed to drop such invalid packets, however I've just
> > found a patch in my .git/patches, dated August 2009, to do this which I
> > forgot to send up
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:34:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
[...]
> > GRO is a specific software implementation of LRO that preserves enough
> > information that it is safe to bridge/forward the resulting skb. The
> > original packets can be reconstructed on transmit (usually through TSO,
> > ot
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:44:47PM +0100, martin.ger...@dser.de wrote:
> /dev/mapper/buildServer--1-tmp on /tmp type ext3 (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
wondering why this snippet does not trigger:
DESTDIR="$(mktemp -d ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mkinitramfs_XX)" || exit 1
chmod 755 "${DESTDIR}"
# do not execut
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 14:23 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Am 05.01.2011 14:11, schrieb Ian Campbell:
>
> > Netback is supposed to drop such invalid packets, however I've just
> > found a patch in my .git/patches, dated August 2009, to do this which I
> > forgot to send upstream.
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.7
Severity: normal
that was just about the full output:
r...@buildserver-1:~# dpkg-reconfigure initramfs-tools
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 296:
/tmp/mkinitramfs_THw6p9/scripts/init-top/all_generic_ide
Hi Ian,
Am 05.01.2011 14:11, schrieb Ian Campbell:
> Netback is supposed to drop such invalid packets, however I've just
> found a patch in my .git/patches, dated August 2009, to do this which I
> forgot to send upstream. I'll do that now!
Shall I still test something or just wait for the fix?
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:34 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (csum_blank must be 1
> for a GSO frame, the drivers were setting it to zero, even though the
> partial checksum was correct, which is invalid)
Netback is supposed to drop such invalid packets, however I've just
found a patch in my .git/patc
Don Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
> Ok. My main concern here is what exactly would happen if we were to
> ignore the ABI change for this particular issue, and then put in place
> some kind of a process where the kernel team could be informed of
> downstream users of the ABI.
The harm is done now, revert
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package linux-2.6
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'linux-2.6'
Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-2.6'
> retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at
> fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
Bug #6088
package linux-2.6
retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at
fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
thanks
Gregg writes:
> [1393760.788377] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap:
> Invalid block bitmap - block_group = 1229, block = 40271874
> [1393760.788779] --
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 23:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:08:32PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 21:44 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> > > So the problem was already present in -23 and it just seems to have the
> > > same symptoms like #596802.
28 matches
Mail list logo
