Hi!
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:48:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 0. The arguments given to all kernel hook scripts are the kernel ABI
> version (the string that uname -r reports) and, optionally, the absolute
> path to the kernel image. If the second argument is missing then the
> path is either
Hi
I'm Massimiliano Sist, I'm using debian testing on my sony vaio. Battery
life is too short because a bug in kernel 2.6.32 2.6.33 2.6.34. This bug is
fixed in 2.6.35 so I'm trying to install it from experimental, but I need
linux-kbuild-2.6.35 that isn't in experimental
repository...When linux-k
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 589179 + pending
Bug #589179 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: heap base address is not
randomised when randomize_va_space is set to 2
Ignoring request to alter
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 589179 + pending
Bug #589179 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: heap base address is not
randomised when randomize_va_space is set to 2
Ignoring request to alter
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 574243 + pending
Bug #574243 [linux-2.6] please restore Sun XVR video drivers, and add the
latest one [was Re: Debian Sparc 5.4 on Sun blade 2500]
Added tag(s) pend
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 15:52 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.1
> Severity: normal
>
> The performance of VAAPI-accelerated video playback dropped. Previously, it
> required 8% CPU, now it takes >= 80% of CPU; even more than non-accelerated
> p
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 17:42 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> Sorry if it is a mistake of mine...
>
> But I installed the linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686 now and my 4 GB RAM
> was showed as 3 GB. Please, see it:
> # free -m
> total used free sharedbuffers
> cached
> Mem:
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#591241: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #591241,
regarding linux-2.6: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#591149: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #591149,
regarding linux-2.6: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590557: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #590557,
regarding linux-2.6: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf
messages
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590546: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #590546,
regarding [l10n:cs] Updated Czech translation of PO debconf template for
package linux-2.6 2.6.32-18
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590193: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #590193,
regarding i915: fix for intel gen3 hangs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#589996: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #589996,
regarding Insane dependency on apt causes kernel to be removed on update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#588574: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #588574,
regarding [ia64] gdb FTBFS and freezes / reboots the machine
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Accepted:
firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-19_all.deb
to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.32-19_all.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.32-19.diff.gz
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-19.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.32-19.dsc
to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-19.dsc
linux-base_2.6.32-19_all.deb
to main/l
linux-2.6_2.6.32-19_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.32-19.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.32-19.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.32_2.6.32-19_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.32_2.6.32-19_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.32_2.6.32-19_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.32_2.6.32-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 582275 normal
Bug #582275 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.4-686: ext3 filesystem
corruption with md RAID1 on Seagate disks
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
severity 582275 normal
thanks
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 07:25:18AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Theodore Tso wrote:
> >
> > It could be an e2fsck bug, or it could be a hardware issue. In my
> > experience, every time
> > I've tried digging into problems with e2fsck
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:15:29AM +1200, Ian Goodacre wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thank you for your attention to this.
>
> I am not familiar with using the experimental distribution. I have
> tried adding experimental to apt.sources but I can't see a
> package for linux-image-2.6.35-rc6-amd64.
>
> I
- Forwarded message from Ian Goodacre -
From: Ian Goodacre
To: Ben Hutchings
Subject: Re: Bug#591622: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: boot failure with acpi
enabled
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:15:29 +1200
Hi Ben,
Thank you for your attention to this.
I am not familiar with using th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 587538 linux-2.6
Bug #587538 [lshw] lshw is provoking a system crash on a sun sparc T1000 machine
Bug reassigned from package 'lshw' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions lshw/02.13-2.
> severity 587538 important
Bug #
Sorry if it is a mistake of mine...
But I installed the linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686 now and my 4 GB RAM was
showed as 3 GB. Please, see it:
# free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 3033 1249 1784 0 64 100
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 591836 - squeeze
Bug #591836 [linux-image-xen-686] linux-image-xen-686: Please add support to PAE
Removed tag(s) squeeze.
> tags 591836 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:15:02PM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> Package: linux-image-xen-686
> Version: 2.6.32-5-xen-686
> Severity: important
> Tags: squeeze
>
> Hi,
>
> The linux-2.6.32-5-xen-686 hasn't support to RAM over 4 GB.
What makes you think that?
> It is needed to use Xen
Package: linux-image-xen-686
Version: 2.6.32-5-xen-686
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze
Hi,
The linux-2.6.32-5-xen-686 hasn't support to RAM over 4 GB.
It is needed to use Xen on i686 machines with 4 GB or more.
Please, add PAE when compiling this kernel.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Eriberto
Hi,
I wanted to provide more details on this closed bug, as I ran into
(I think) the same problem. Could this bug be re-opened?
Best regards,
Jaap Eldering
- Forwarded message from Jaap Eldering -
From: Jaap Eldering
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:03:50 +0200
To: 524...@bugs.debian.org,
Your message dated Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:51:58 +0200
with message-id <20100805095158.gc17...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#591746: ./scripts/package/builddeb: s/Section:
admin/Section: kernel/
has caused the Debian Bug report #591746,
regarding ./scripts/package/builddeb: s/Section: admin/Section
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #590327 (http://bugs.debian.org/590327)
# * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi
Your message dated Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:14:37 -0400
with message-id <20100805161437.ga15...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Problem solved by updating the kernel
has caused the Debian Bug report #508589,
regarding KPPP Exits Kills Keyboard with Zoom USB Modem Model 3095
to be marked as don
Your message dated Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:14:37 -0400
with message-id <20100805161437.ga15...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Problem solved by updating the kernel
has caused the Debian Bug report #508589,
regarding ppp: USB Modem removal after PPP exits kills keyboard
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:11:47 -0400
with message-id <20100805161147.ga14...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#577109: KPPP Exits Kills Keyboard with Zoom USB Modem
Model 3095
has caused the Debian Bug report #577109,
regarding ppp: USB Modem removal after PPP exits kills
Your message dated Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:11:47 -0400
with message-id <20100805161147.ga14...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#577109: KPPP Exits Kills Keyboard with Zoom USB Modem
Model 3095
has caused the Debian Bug report #577109,
regarding KPPP Exits Kills Keyboard with Zoom USB Mode
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 568126 release-notes
Bug #568126 [linux-2.6] lm-sensors: Fails to read my sensors
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'release-notes'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-9.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please c
reassign 568126 release-notes
thanks
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:30:08PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi 2 août 2010 00:27:10, vous avez écrit :
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:58:36AM -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> > > Package: lm-sensors
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > >
> > > This
Le lundi 2 août 2010 00:27:10, vous avez écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:58:36AM -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> > Package: lm-sensors
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > This looks like a consequence of a recent change in kernel policy
> > regarding resource conflicts. According to the 'kernel-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 590607 591768
Bug#590607: linux-image-2.6.35-rc6-amd64: cruft file modules.devname left on
the system after purging
Bug#591768: linux-2.6: rmdir: failed to remove `/lib/modules/2.6.35-rc6-amd64':
Directory not empty
Bug#591683: linux-2.6:
You can use the attache script to test fsync rate (pveperf)
(need packages libfile-sync-perl and libnet-dns-perl)
- Dietmar
pveperf
Description: pveperf
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
The performance of VAAPI-accelerated video playback dropped. Previously, it
required 8% CPU, now it takes >= 80% of CPU; even more than non-accelerated
playback.
I know that it worked perfectly on RC5, and if I recall correctly,
Package: firmware-ipw2x00
Version: 0.26
Package `firmware-ipw2x00' contains a firmware version that breaks WEP on
the Intel Pro Wireless 2200 in my ThinkPad T43.
Module ipw2200 loads and detects the interface, but does not connect to
WEP networks (when configured with iwconfig, or using NetworkMa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Archive section doesn't really matter for local packages
> severity 591746 minor
Bug #591746 [linux-source-2.6.32] ./scripts/package/builddeb: s/Section:
admin/Section: kernel/
Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
When I uninstall kernels, I get warnings like:
rmdir: failed to remove `/lib/modules/2.6.32-3-amd64': Directory not
empty
rmdir: failed to remove `/lib/modules/2.6.35-rc6-amd64': Directory not
empty
The reason is a file named 'modules.devname'
To work arround the problem, we installed Open Suse 11.3 on one of the Servers.
The problem does not appear on this OS. I can see that the bnx driver and
firmware are newer versions:
linux-vyse:~ # ethtool -i eth0
driver: bnx2
version: 2.0.9
firmware-version: 5.2.7 bc 5.2.2 NCSI 2.0.8
bus-info:
Package: linux-source-2.6.32
Version: 2.6.32-18
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Please set a linux-image deb that is created by the deb-pkg target to
Section: kernel. The kernel-package does the right thing.
The following patch is untested:
--- ./scripts/package/builddeb 2009-12-03 05:51:21.00
43 matches
Mail list logo