Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: normal
This problem concerns the Xen 2.6.32 kernel not booting when running Xen with
dom0_mem set to less than 335000 (33 fails). After the Xen kernel loads
it
doesn't appear to even start executing Linux kernel code, it just blanks the
screen
i can confirm the problem but can't solve it by recompiling the package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100424200952.23e47...@eisflach
maximilian attems wrote:
> tried 3cfc3092f40bc37c57ba556cfd8de4218f2135ab,
> ffde22ac53b6d6b1d7206f1172176a667eead778.
>
> none of them apply.
ffde22ac53b6d6b1d7206f1172176a667eead778 (Xen-HVM) applies with some
(manually checked, safe) fuzz/offset.
On top of that, afbcf7ab8d1bc8c2d04792f6d9e786e
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:48:12AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is definitely worthwhile but it does involve an ABI bump. So we
> > will probably wait for a convenient time to do that.
> I saw that you (well, maks) just bumped the ABI to -5. Ping? :)
tried 3cfc30
Kompliment an das Wochenende dort drüben?
Wie geht es dir heute? Ich hoffe, Sie sind schön, wenn so danke Gott sei
allmächtig. Mein Name ist Miss.Beatrice, einziges Mädchen, sucht ehrliche und
nette Person. Jemand, der Sorgfalt und Respekt Gott, den ich mit dem Partner
kann ich nicht tun, kümme
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have translated debconf messages to Estonian.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel:
On 24 April 2010 11:01, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Was was the final decision of merging the small util into one of the
>>> other packages and the udev rules into usbmuxd?
>>>
>>
>> This was discussed a few weeks ago, but I don't recall anyone being in
>> overwhelming support of the idea. I'm not s
>> Was was the final decision of merging the small util into one of the
>> other packages and the udev rules into usbmuxd?
>>
>
> This was discussed a few weeks ago, but I don't recall anyone being in
> overwhelming support of the idea. I'm not sure that usbmuxd should
> have *libimobiledevice-util
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is definitely worthwhile but it does involve an ABI bump. So we
> will probably wait for a convenient time to do that.
I saw that you (well, maks) just bumped the ABI to -5. Ping? :)
Thanks,
Faidon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 24 April 2010 08:00, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Paul McEnery wrote:
>> 2010/4/22 Ben Hutchings :
>>> On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:09 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
[...]
> 1. Keep the ipheth-utils pack
Paul McEnery wrote:
Hi,
> My initial thoughts are to simply drop the dependency on the dkms
> package, but ipheth will now be in every kernel going forward, so
> there will not be any need for it. Any advice would be much
> appreciated. Please include me in any reply as I'm not on the list.
I t
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Paul McEnery wrote:
> 2010/4/22 Ben Hutchings :
>> On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 21:09 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> > 1. Keep the ipheth-utils package and drop ipheth-dkms when ipheth
>>> > makes it in
12 matches
Mail list logo
