>> Was was the final decision of merging the small util into one of the >> other packages and the udev rules into usbmuxd? >> > > This was discussed a few weeks ago, but I don't recall anyone being in > overwhelming support of the idea. I'm not sure that usbmuxd should > have *libimobiledevice-utils* as a dependency for something may not be > used by everyone. If there is some value in this, then I think its > worth reopening the discussion.
No, you've mis interpreted what was said. The udev rule would be in usbmuxd with the other ipod/iphone rules for various bits and then the actual pairing utill would be in libimobiledevice. There would be no extra dependencies. > At this point I'm working on dropping the ipheth-dkms package and > keeping only ipheth-utils which provides the udev rules and pariing > utility. As discussed previously the pairing util can be done with some of the utils already in libimobiledevice so it would mean there doesn't need to be yet another package for a tiny util and a single line udev rule. > If the former approach is preferred, then we can look at getting the > respective maintainers involved... > > Regards, > Paul. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/j2z5256d0b1004240301i5860159ct4d141d9c2d70d...@mail.gmail.com
